Abstract 13409: Left Ventricular Remodeling and Function Following Aortic Valve Replacement for Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction-Results From the TOPAS Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdellaziz Dahou ◽  
Marie-Annick Clavel ◽  
Jean G Dumesnil ◽  
Romain Capoulade ◽  
Henrique B Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Lv Remodeling ◽  
And Function

Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended (IIa) in symptomatic patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (PLF-LG AS). This entity is characterized by pronounced LV concentric remodeling with impaired LV filling and reduced LV longitudinal systolic function and stroke volume despite preserved LV ejection fraction (p-EF). However, there is lack of data about the evolution of LV geometry and function following AVR in these patients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled thirty-two patients (age=71±12 years; 59% men) with PLF-LG AS (SVi<35 mL/m2, mean gradient<40 mmHg, indexed aortic valve area [AVA] 50%) who underwent AVR within 3 months following inclusion. Stroke volume was measured in the LV outflow tract by pulsed-wave Doppler and indexed for body surface area (SVi). Global left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS) was measured by 2D speckle tracking. Results: Following AVR, mean gradient decreased (15±8 mmHg post vs. 30±7 pre AVR) and AVA increased significantly (1.40±0.31 vs. 0.70±0.12 cm2) (all p<0.0001). AVR was associated with a positive LV remodeling with an increase in LV end-diastolic diameter (46±4 vs. 44±4 vs mm; p=0.0027) and volume (99±21 vs. 89±20 ml, p=0.003) and a decrease in relative wall thickness (0.46±0.06 vs. 0.58±0.11; p=0.0004) and LV mass (175±37 vs. 207±44 g; p=0.002). SVi increased significantly from baseline to 1 year (36±7 vs. 31±3 ml/m2; p=0.0002), whereas LVEF remained unchanged (63±6 vs 63±7; p=NS). SVi increased significantly in the subset of patients with mild to moderate DD at baseline (all p<0.05) but not in those with severe DD (p=NS). GLS also increased significantly from baseline to 1 year (17±4 vs. 14.5±4%; p=0.03). There was a significant correlation between post-AVR increase in GLS and increase in SVi (r=0.52; p=0.02). Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that in patients with PLF-LG AS and p-EF, AVR is associated with an increase in LV stroke volume which is mainly due to positive LV remodeling and improvement in LV longitudinal systolic function. Our results provide further support to the ACC/AHA recommendations with regard to indication of AVR in these patients.

Abstract 121: Improvement in Functional Mitral Regurgitation After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Insufficiency

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Griffin Boll ◽  
Frederick Y Chen
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Insufficiency ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Lv Remodeling

Objective: Aortic insufficiency (AI) can lead to left ventricular (LV) remodeling characterized by dilation and increased LV mass. This remodeling can cause altered mitral valve coaptation and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). While there is growing evidence that aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis promotes sufficient ventricular reverse remodeling that FMR improves or resolves, this effect is not well characterized for patients with AI. Methods: All cases of AVR for AI that were performed at a single center between January 2003 and December 2015 were reviewed. Cases with any concomitant procedures, any degree of aortic stenosis, any evidence of ischemic etiology, absence of mitral regurgitation, or significant primary mitral pathology were excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was change in FMR after isolated AVR. Secondary outcomes included change in LV ejection fraction (EF), left atrial (LA) dimension, and change in end-diastolic and –systolic LV dimensions. Two-tailed paired t-test was used to evaluate for difference between the two time points. Results: Over the course of 13.4 years, 31 cases of isolated aortic valve replacement for pure aortic insufficiency with concurrent functional mitral regurgitation were identified. 54.8% (17/31) of cases had some evidence of bacteremia or aortic vegetations at time of surgery, with 41.9% (13/31) of cases completed urgently. Postoperatively, FMR was improved in 74.2% (23/31) of the patients, and decreased by a mean 1.0 ± 0.8 grades (1.6 ± 0.8 vs 0.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). There was no significant change in LV EF (50.5 ± 13.4 vs. 50.2 ± 12.9, p = 0.892) or LA dimension (42.5 ± 7.2 vs 40.7 ± 5.9, p = 0.341), but there were significant reductions in the dimension of the LV at end-diastole (56.7 ± 7.1 vs 47.7 ± 8.5, p < 0.001) and end-systole (38.5 ± 9.7 vs 34.0 ± 8.3, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Significant reduction in ventricular size and subsequent improvement in functional mitral regurgitation is expected after isolated aortic valve replacement for pure aortic insufficiency.

Abstract 2066: Does Mitral Regurgitation Regress After Aortic Valve Replacement For Aortic Stenosis ? A Prospective Multicenter Study

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Unger ◽  
Danièle Plein ◽  
Bernard Cosyns ◽  
Guy Van Camp ◽  
Olivier Xhaët ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Regurgitant Volume ◽  
Lv Ejection Fraction

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Whether its severity may decrease after AVR remains controversial. Previous studies were mainly retrospective and the degree of MR was assessed at best semi-quantitatively. This study sought to prospectively and quantitatively assess how AVR may affect MR severity. Methods: Patients with AS scheduled for isolated AVR and presenting holosystolic MR which was not considered for replacement or repair were included. Previous mitral valve surgery; severe aortic regurgitation and poor acoustic windows were excluded. Thirty-five patients (mean age 77±7 years) were studied before (median 1, range 1– 41 days) and after AVR (median 7, range 4 –19 days). All patients underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic examination; MR was assessed by Doppler echocardiography using color flow mapping of the regurgitant jet and the PISA method. No patient had prolapsed or flail mitral leaflet as mechanism of MR. Results: Preoperative maximal and mean transaortic pressure gradients and aortic valve area were 74±26 mmHg, 44±16 mmHg, and 0.57±0.18 cm 2 , respectively. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increased from 49±16 % to 55±15 % after AVR (p<0.001). LV end-diastolic volume decreased from 91±32 ml to 77±30 ml (p<0.001).The ratio of MR jet to left atrial area decreased from 30±16% to 20±14% (p<0.001). MR effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) and regurgitant volume decreased from 10±5 mm 2 to 8±6 mm 2 (p=0.015) and from 19±10 ml to 11±9 ml (p<0.0001). The decrease in ERO and in regurgitant volume was similar in patients with preserved or depressed LV ejection fraction (≤45 %) (2±3 vs 3±6 mm 2 and 7±9 vs 8±7 ml; p=NS, respectively). Conclusions: AVR is associated with an early postoperative reduction of the quantified degree of MR. This mainly results from a decrease in regurgitant volume and only modestly from a reduction in ERO, emphasizing the contributing role of the decrease in driving pressure accross the mitral regurgitant orifice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document