scholarly journals Personal Reflections on Big Science, Small Science, or the Right Mix

2014 ◽  
Vol 114 (7) ◽  
pp. 1080-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Lauer
1992 ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Frederick Seitz
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 338 (6109) ◽  
pp. 882-883
Author(s):  
L. Siminovitch
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-647
Author(s):  
Richard B Hovey

The purpose of preparing this Feature Article was to explore and share my lived experience of living with multiple layers of chronic pain, with a diagnosis of advanced, aggressive and metastasized prostate cancer, and COVID-19. My exploration begins with the manifestations of chronic pain from a bicycling accident, psoriatic arthritis, with cancer treatments and the pain it creates during a panademic has added to the challenges of social distancing, isolation, and medical treatments. As with many patient experiences, we the person as patient outside of health care sometimes struggle to find the right words, the proper sentence structure and as Tamas writes about the expectation of others to provide, “Clean and reasonable scholarship about messy, unreasonable experiences is an exercise in alienation.” I write this while living with extreme chronic pain, continue cancer treatments while the threat and additional anxiety of COVID-19 looms over me. This is my story.


Physics World ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Martin Rees
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Felipe Ramírez Gil

El transhumanismo convive con la humanidad. La presente reflexión analiza  el Biopunk, movimiento  contracultural que rompen los esquemas tradicionales de investigar del Big Science. Aquel enmarca su gestión investigativa  en la ética DIYBio (Do It Yourself, hágalo usted mismo),  enriqueciendo  los canales tecno científicos desde la Small Science. Realizando un rastreo desde el movimiento del Punk Rock de los años setenta, pasando por el Cyber y Cypherpunk,  llegando al Biopunk y el accionar de los biohackers, se contrasta sus bases éticas con la autonomía, vulnerabilidad y justicia propias de la bioética. Se identifica un campo el cual la bioética no ha ocupado; su encuentro con el Biopunk y la manera como podría aquella realizar su aproximación al mencionado movimiento contracultural.


Author(s):  
Bradley E. Alger

This chapter reviews distinctions between kinds of science, which is especially relevant to the book’s topic because it is an area that Karl Popper did not consider in detail. This creates a problem since critics of the hypothesis often do not distinguish between true hypothesis-based science and other kinds that don’t depend on hypotheses, and the traditional divisions of science miss the main points. The chapter distinguishes among several modern kinds of science including Big Science/Small Science and how they relate to Big Data and Little Data, and why Discovery Science is different from hypothesis-testing science. It separates “exploratory” from “confirmatory” studies and explains why this terminology can create confusion in trying to understand science. The differences between applied and basic science are genuine and meaningful because these two kinds of science have different goals and apply different, though overlapping, standards to achieve their goals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document