scholarly journals Diagnostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Monozygotic Twins With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Identical Pattern of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 115 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Maron ◽  
Tammy S. Haas ◽  
John R. Lesser
Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullahi O Oseni ◽  
Waqas T Qureshi ◽  
Mohammed F Almahmoud ◽  
Alain Bertoni ◽  
David A Bluemke ◽  
...  

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an established risk factor for heart failure (HF). However, it is unknown whether LVH detected by electrocardiogram (ECG-LVH) is equivalent to LVH ascertained by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-LVH) in terms of prediction of incident HF using risk prediction models like the Framingham Heart Failure Risk Score (FHFRS). Methods: This analysis included 4745 (mean age 61+10 years, 53.5% women, 61.7% non-whites) from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who were free of cardiovascular disease at the time of enrollment. ECG-LVH was defined using Cornell’s criteria while MRI-LVH was derived from left ventricular (LV) mass measured by cardiac MRI. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine the association between ECG-LVH and MRI-LVH with incident HF. Harrell’s concordance C-index was used to estimate the predictive ability of the FHFRS when either ECG-LVH or MRI-LVH were included as one of its components. The added predictive ability of ECG-LVH and MRI-LVH were investigated using integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index and relative IDI. Results: ECG-LVH was present in 291(6.1%) while MRI-LVH was present in 499 (10.5%) of the participants. Over a median follow up of 10.4 years, 140 participants developed HF. Both ECG-LVH [HR (95% CI): 2.25(1.38-3.69)] and MRI-LVH [HR (95% CI): 3.80(1.56-5.63)] were associated with an increased risk of HF in multivariable adjusted models (Table 1). The ability of FHFRS to predict HF was improved with MRI-LVH (C-index 0.871, 95% CI: 0.842-0.899) when compared with ECG-LVH (C-index 0.860, 95% CI: 0.833-0.888) (p < 0.0001). To assess the potential clinical utility of using LVH-MRI instead of ECG-LVH, we calculated several measures of reclassification (Table 1), which were consistent with the statistically significantly improved C-statistic with MRI-LVH. Conclusion: Both ECG-LVH and MRI-LVH are predictive of HF when used in the FHFRS. Substituting MRI-LVH for ECG-LVH improves the predictive ability of the FHFRS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
N.M. Nosenko ◽  
D.V. Shchehlov ◽  
M.Yu. Mamonova ◽  
Ya.E. Kudelskyi

There are some imaging methods for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Such as echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging. These methods help to identify changes at different stages, evaluate the prognosis, stratify the risk and differential diagnosis.The left ventricle hypertrophy is a condition that may be due to physiological adaptation due to overload. For example, in patients with arterial hypertension, in athletes, and so on. Left ventricle hypertrophy may also be associated with a change in the actual structure: for example, with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Signs of left ventricle hypertrophy by echocardiography are a very significant predictor of mortality in patients with arterial hypertension in the general population. The presence of left ventricle hypertrophy by echocardiography is a high cardiovascular risk for the patient.It is important to diagnose diseases with a high risk of sudden cardiac death on time. One of these diseases is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A clinical diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is impossible without visualization. Therefore, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommends a multimodal approach in examining patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Сomputed tomography, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging are used to diagnose which patient’s hypertrophy is pathological or physiological. The choice of which method to use depends on the diagnostic task, and also on the specific advantages and disadvantages of the method. Different visualization methods should be considered complementary, not competing. It is also important to choose a particular imaging technique given its diagnostic value, availability, benefits, risks and costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document