scholarly journals Drug-Eluting Balloon in Peripheral Intervention for Below the Knee Angioplasty Evaluation (DEBATE-BTK)

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Liistro ◽  
Italo Porto ◽  
Paolo Angioli ◽  
Simone Grotti ◽  
Lucia Ricci ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. S38
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Gonzalez ◽  
Enrique Filgueiras ◽  
Glenn Barquet ◽  
Francis Crespo ◽  
Gibert Gonzalez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 2277-2286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Liistro ◽  
Paolo Angioli ◽  
Giorgio Ventoruzzo ◽  
Kenneth Ducci ◽  
Matteo Rocco Reccia ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (17) ◽  
pp. B47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigore Popusoi ◽  
Angelo Cioppa ◽  
Eugenio Stabile ◽  
Luigi Salemme ◽  
Vittorio Ambrosini ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khalid ◽  
Mahmoud El Iskandarani ◽  
Vijay Ramu ◽  
Michael Donovan ◽  
Terry Forrest ◽  
...  

Introduction: Studies have shown decrease rates of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) with drug eluting balloon (DEB) in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Hypothesis: The aim of this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of DEB versus Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) below the knee peripheral intervention. Methods: Electronic databases including MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until April 2020 comparing outcomes of DEB vs PTA in patients with CLI below the knee. End points were major amputation, major adverse events (MAEs), all-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed and p <0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Results: A total of 4 RCTs (n=655) were included in the final analysis. There were no differences of major amputation (RR: 1.30; CI: 0.68-2.46; p=0.43), MAEs (RR: 0.86; CI: 0.60-1.23; p=0.41), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; CI: 0.69-1.19; p=0.48), TLR (RR: 0.65; CI: 0.30-1.44; p=0.29), MI (RR: 1.71; CI: 0.57-5.14; p=0.34) and CVA (RR: 0.66; CI: 0.19-2.26; p=0.50) between the 2 groups [Figure 1]. Conclusions: There were no significant differences of major amputation and TLR for DEB versus PTA . Major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality were not statistically different for drug coated balloon versus PTA in the management of below knee critical limb ischemia. Further studies needed to confirm these findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouar Belkacemi ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
Michiel Voskuil ◽  
Pieter Doevendans ◽  
Pieter Stella ◽  
...  

Percutaneous treatment of complex coronary lesions, such as small-vessel disease, diabetes and long diffuse disease, remain hampered by suboptimal results, even with the use of drug-eluting stents (DES). The paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) is an interesting emerging device that optimises clinical outcomes in these specific lesions. The DEB may become a viable alternative treatment option for the inhibition of coronary restenosis and subsequent revascularisation, as it allows local release of a high-concentration antirestenotic drug, paclitaxel, into the coronary vessel without using a metal scaffold or durable polymers. Several studies have already shown promising and consistent results in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The DEB has demonstrated its added value compared with certain DES. Inspired by these results, an increasing number of studies have been started in different coronary lesion subsets to explore the value of the DEB in a broader range of lesions. It will be interesting to see whether the DEB will find more indications beyond in-stent restenosis treatment. Moreover, will all DEBs offer the same added value, or will there be differences in efficacy among the DEBs produced by the various manufacturers? As was the case in the development of DES, now the puzzle pieces have to be put together for DEB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document