scholarly journals Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
Stephan Windecker
2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Bonello ◽  
Axel De Labriolle ◽  
Gilles Lemesle ◽  
Probal Roy ◽  
Daniel H. Steinberg ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelfattah Marey ◽  
Hisham Ammar Mohamed ◽  
Ahmed Abdol Moneim Rezq ◽  
Ramy Raymond Elias

Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of Intravascular ultrasound guidance on the final volume of contrast agent utilized in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for chronic stable angina. Background To date, few approaches have been described to reduce the final dose of contrast agent in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We hypothesized that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) might serve as an adjuctive imaging tool in many steps during PCI, thereby reducing the use of iodine contrast. Methods A total of 100 Diabeic Egyptian patients were selected to angiography-guided PCI or IVUSguided PCI from June 2019 to January 2020 .The study type was case control and non consecutive . Both groups were treated according to a pre-defined meticulous procedural strategy. A written informed consent was taken from all patients.The primary endpoint was the total volume contrast agent used during PCI. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 6 months. Results The median total volume of contrast was 111.65 ml (interquartile range [IQR] 170.40 ± 52.91ml , range from 100 ml to 300 ml) in angiography-guided group vs. 56.99 ml (IQR 94.70 ± 19.28ml , range from 70 ml to 180 ml) in IVUS-guided group (p < 0.001).similary, the median total volume of contrast was 111.65 ml (interquartile range [IQR] 170.40 ± 52.91ml , range from 100 ml to 300 ml) in angiographyguided group vs. 56.99 ml (IQR 94.70 ± 19.28ml , range from 70 ml to 180 ml) in IVUS-guided group (p < 0.001).In-hospital and 6 month outcomes were not different between patients randomized to angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI according to : Death, Acute myocardial infarction, Unplanned revascularization, Stent thrombosis. Conclusions Thoughtful and extensive utilization of IVUS as the primary imaging tool to guide PCI is safe, and markedly reduces the volume of iodine contrast, compared to angiography alone guidance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Christos S. Katsouras ◽  
Georgios E. Bozios ◽  
Lampros K. Michalis ◽  
John Kalef-Ezra ◽  
Dimitris Patsouras ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel Chamié ◽  
J. Ribamar Costa ◽  
Lucas P. Damiani ◽  
Dimytri Siqueira ◽  
Sérgio Braga ◽  
...  

Background: Specific algorithms for use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce. Also, the relative benefits of intravascular imaging guidance have not been tested against an optimized angiography-guided PCI strategy. In iSIGHT (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Interventions), we aimed to investigate whether OCT-guided PCI achieves noninferior stent expansion compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and if both imaging modalities lead to superior stent expansion compared with an optimized angiography-based strategy. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old undergoing PCI for ≥1 lesion in native coronaries of 2.25 to 4.00 mm in diameter were randomized 1:1:1 to OCT-, IVUS-, or angiography-guided PCI. Predetermined guidance protocols were applied in all groups. An external elastic membrane–based protocol was used for stent sizing by OCT and IVUS. The primary end point was noninferiority of stent expansion (minimum stent area ≥90% of the average reference lumen area), measured by post-PCI OCT, in OCT-guided versus IVUS-guided PCI (noninferiority margin, 6.5%). Results: One hundred fifty-one patients (156 lesions) were randomly allocated to OCT (51 lesions [32.7%]), IVUS (52 lesions [33.3%]), or angiography (53 lesions [34.0%]). Stent expansion with OCT guidance (98.01±16.14%) was noninferior to IVUS (91.69±15.75%; 1-sided lower 95% CI, 0.55 mm 2 ; P non-inferiority <0.001) and superior to angiography (90.53±14.84%, P =0.041). IVUS and angiography obtained similar stent expansions ( P =0.921). Stent edge dissection and periprocedural complication rates were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions: Stent expansion with OCT guidance using a dedicated external elastic membrane–based sizing strategy was noninferior to that achieved with IVUS and superior to an optimized angiographic strategy. Registration: URL: plataformabrasil.saude.gov.br ; Unique identifier: 69968417.8.0000.5462.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document