scholarly journals Letter by Jin-shan and Xue-bin Regarding Article, “Genotype-Phenotype Correlation of SCN5A Mutation for the Clinical and Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Probands With Brugada Syndrome: A Japanese Multicenter Registry”

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 136 (23) ◽  
pp. 2287-2288
Author(s):  
He Jin-shan ◽  
Li Xue-bin
Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (23) ◽  
pp. 2255-2270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Yamagata ◽  
Minoru Horie ◽  
Takeshi Aiba ◽  
Satoshi Ogawa ◽  
Yoshifusa Aizawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-491
Author(s):  
Joseane Elza Tonussi Mendes ◽  
Kjell Nikus ◽  
Raimundo Barbosa-Barros ◽  
Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera

Backgroung: The eponymous Brugada Syndrome (BrS) in honor of its discovery as an independent entity by the Spanish/ Catalan Brugada brothers, Pedro and Josep, has deserved numerous denominations derived mainly from the clinical genotype/phenotype correlation. The purpose of this manuscript is to present and analyze the nomenclatures that this intriguing and challenging syndrome has received over the past 28 years. We also compared the main features between cases from the first report of the Brugada brothers and an article by Martini et al. The nomenclatures used by these authors are closely linked to the BrS, but the cases (except one) presented in the article by Martini et al do not present the type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, which is mandatory for the diagnosis of BrS.


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Ciconte ◽  
Michelle M Monasky ◽  
Vincenzo Santinelli ◽  
Emanuele Micaglio ◽  
Gabriele Vicedomini ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in young, otherwise healthy individuals. Despite SCN5A being the most commonly known mutated gene to date, the genotype–phenotype relationship is poorly understood and remains uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the genotype–phenotype correlation in BrS. Methods and results Brugada syndrome probands deemed at high risk of future arrhythmic events underwent genetic testing and phenotype characterization by the means of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) mapping, and were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of SCN5A mutation. Two-hundred probands (160 males, 80%; mean age 42.6 ± 12.2 years) were included in this study. Patients harbouring SCN5A mutations exhibited a spontaneous type 1 pattern and experienced aborted cardiac arrest or spontaneous VT/VF more frequently than the other subjects. SCN5A-positive patients exhibited a larger epicardial AS area, more prolonged electrograms and more frequently observed non-invasive late potentials. The presence of an SCN5A mutation explained >26% of the variation in the epicardial AS area and was the strongest predictor of a large epicardial area. Conclusion  In BrS, the genetic background is the main determinant for the extent of the electrophysiological abnormalities. SCN5A mutation carriers exhibit more pronounced epicardial electrical abnormalities and a more aggressive clinical presentation. These results contribute to the understanding of the genetic determinants of the BrS phenotypic expression and provide possible explanations for the varying degrees of disease expression.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ponti Emanuela ◽  
Mihalich Alessandra ◽  
Broggi Francesca ◽  
Maria Di Blasio Anna ◽  
Luisa Bianchi Maria

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document