Abstract TP157: Rates of Spinal Cord Infarction After Repair of Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino Gialdini ◽  
Alexander E Merkler ◽  
Neal S Parikh ◽  
Michael P Lerario ◽  
Abhinaba Chatterjee ◽  
...  

Introduction: The rate of spinal cord infarction associated with repair of an aortic aneurysm or dissection is uncertain. Methods: We identified all adult patients discharged from nonfederal acute care hospitals in California, New York, and Florida who underwent surgical or endovascular repair of a thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection between 2005 and 2013. Our outcome was a spinal cord infarction ( ICD9-CM codes: 336.1 or 344.1-5) occurring during the index hospitalization for aortic repair. Patients with a spinal cord infarction prior to the hospitalization for aortic repair were excluded. Descriptive statistics with exact confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report crude rates of spinal cord infarction in patients with repair of ruptured aortic aneurysm or dissection and in patients with repair of unruptured aneurysm. In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the rate of spinal cord infarction in these groups by treatment approach – surgical versus endovascular. Results: We identified 116,892 patients who underwent repair for an aortic aneurysm or dissection, and spinal cord infarction was diagnosed in 658 cases (0.56%, 95% CI, 0.52-0.61%). Patients with spinal cord infarction were more often male and more likely to have vascular risk factors. In patients undergoing repair of a ruptured aneurysm or dissection, the rate of spinal cord infarction was 1.91% (95% CI, 1.70-2.13%), compared to 0.35% (95% CI, 0.32-0.39%) in patients undergoing repair of an unruptured aneurysm. In secondary analysis of patients with repair of ruptured aneurysm or dissection, spinal cord infarction occurred in 1.88% (95% CI, 1.63-2.13%) of those undergoing surgical repair and 2.01% (95% CI, 1.59-2.44%) of those undergoing endovascular repair. For patients with repair of unruptured aneurysm, spinal cord infarction occurred in 0.42% (95% CI, 0.36-0.47%) of those undergoing surgical repair and 0.29% (95% CI, 0.24-0.33%) of those undergoing endovascular repair. Conclusions: Clinically apparent spinal cord infarction results from approximately 1 in 50 procedures to repair an aortic dissection or ruptured aneurysm and 1 in 300 procedures to repair an unruptured aortic aneurysm.

Author(s):  
Firas Aljanadi ◽  
Joseph Doyle

Spinal cord infarction secondary to dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm is a relatively rare phenomenon; it is uncommon for descending aortic aneurysm to present with paraplegia. We report the case of 60 year old man presenting with sudden onset paraplegia secondary to spinal cord infarction caused by dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm with intraluminal thrombus. Spinal MRI confirmed findings and he underwent emergency surgery. Post-operatively he displayed neurological improvement, and was mobilising with a frame by 2-month outpatient clinic review.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Maeda ◽  
Kenji Yoshitani ◽  
Shunsuke Sato ◽  
Hitoshi Matsuda ◽  
Yuzuru Inatomi ◽  
...  

EJVES Extra ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
J.P.P.M. de Vries ◽  
F.H.W.M. van der Heijden ◽  
A.D. Montauban van Swijndregt ◽  
A.C. Vahl

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavio Villani ◽  
Aaron Thomas Fargion ◽  
Alberto Melani ◽  
Davide Esposito ◽  
Rossella Di Domenico ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The etiology of delayed-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) following endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is still unclear and may be related to multiple factors. Extravascular factors, such as lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), may play a significant role in the selection of patient at risk of SCI. In this report we describe a case of paraplegia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in a patient suffering from severe and symptomatic LSS and undergoing staged endovascular repair of a TAAA.Case presentation: A 70-year-old man was admitted to our department with an asymptomatic type III TAAA in previous open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient complained of buttock and thigh claudication in the absence of defects in the pelvic perfusion; a spinal magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) showed a severe narrowing of the lumbar canal. The first-step procedure was estimated at intermediate risk of SCI and considering a recent cardiac procedure requiring double antiplatelet therapy, in agreement with anesthesiologists, a preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was not performed during the first-step. After 24 hours from TEVAR paraplegia was detected. The drainage was then placed with incomplete recovery. The second stage was performed in urgency three weeks after, without complications and changes in neurological status.Conclusions: Stenotic damage to the spinal cord is thought to be the result of direct compression of the neural elements and ischemic disruption of arterial and venous structures surrounding the spinal cord. This comorbidity may constitute an additional anatomic risk factor in those patients currently recognized as prognostically associated to the development of SCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document