The Desperate Diplomat Revisited

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-333
Author(s):  
Masako R. Okura

This article, an elaboration on The Desperate Diplomat (2016), reexamines Japanese Special Envoy Kurusu Saburo’s mission to the United States before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, presenting a new “concurring opinion” in support of his innocence. The u.s. government firmly believed that Kurusu had been informed of the impending attack prior to coming to the United States and thus acted as a smoke screen. And so, the myth of the deceitful ambassador was born. Nevertheless, Kurusu insisted that he had no prior knowledge of Japan’s military action. Misunderstanding of his role in the Pearl Harbor attack and harsh remarks about it upset him. Utilizing Kurusu’s unpublished and previously unused materials in both Japanese and English housed in the National Diet Library in Tokyo, records from the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and The Desperate Diplomat, based on his original memoir, this article helps Kurusu tell his side of the story to initiate scholarly debate on this insufficiently researched diplomat. This reassessment also presents excerpts from Kurusu’s unpublished personal correspondences with E. Stanley Jones, Bernard M. Baruch, and Joseph C. Grew.

Author(s):  
Ravdangiin Bold

More than 20 Soviet, Mongolian and Japanese witnesses who had taken part in the battles in the area of the Khalkhyn Gol (English “Khalkha River”) were heard in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, held in Tokyo in 1946-1948. The events were presented to the world community to the extent appropriate. Although some believe that the Tokyo Trial was an event where the victors in the war were able to impose their views and the decision on the war’s losers, the Tribunal was a very important event that revealed the causes of military action in the Khalkhyn Gol area and came to conclusions of international significance. The Tokyo Trial found that the military action near the Khalkhyn Gol was “an aggressive war unleashed against the MPR and the USSR” and prepared by Japan in advance. It was a reasoned conclusion from the point of view that “War is a continuation of politics by other means” as well as from the point of view of international law. On the other hand, at the time, the Tokyo Trial made a political judgement that the military action in the Khalkhyn Gol area was “an aggressive war”, that undoubtedly makes those events a real war for Mongolia. The article was written based on the decision of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East on the military activities in the Khalkhyn Gol area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document