The European Community and Marine Environmental Protection in the International Law of the Sea

Author(s):  
Veronica Frank
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-152
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang

Abstract The development of international law of the sea by international courts and tribunals is generally acknowledged among international lawyers. In retrospect, the creative jurisprudence of international judicial bodies was incorporated into the mainstream of international law-making process in many cases, while the experience of failure cannot be ignored. In the past decade, the strengthening of marine environmental protection has become a tendency in international adjudication. Accordingly, the content and scope of due diligence obligation has been discovered, consolidated and extended. In light of the evolution of due diligence obligation, the methodology of law-making by international judicial bodies includes: inter alia, interpretation, cross-reference of precedents, analogy, and assertion. However, from the perspective of legitimacy, law-making should not become the normal function of international judicial bodies. Bearing in mind international rule of law and good administration of justice, the lawmaking activities of international courts and tribunals should be curtailed in certain degree.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelica Bonfanti ◽  
Francesca Romanin Jacur

This article addresses treaty-based regimes and the so-called Ocean Corporate Social Responsibility (ocsr) that are relevant to marine environmental protection and energy activities. In this context, special attention is paid to the interactions among the legal regimes in which the environmental and safety rules and standards are adopted and to the effects of the regulatory technique of “legislation by reference”. After examining the relevant obligations of States within the framework of the un Convention on the Law of the Sea and the International Maritime Organization, the authors analyse ocsr, especially its preventive, damage mitigation and compensatory functions and its potential synergies with the treaty-based regimes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Mossop

At the conclusion of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982, there was considerable optimism that the Convention would usher in a new age of marine environmental protection. This article argues that, while UNCLOS did contain important innovations for marine environmental protections, key structural problems prevented the Convention from fulfilling more optimistic predictions of success. Concepts such as freedom of the high seas and exclusive flag state jurisdiction as well as the lack of an effective institution with competence over the law of the sea generally have impeded progress. Instead, states have relied on incremental development to seek improvements in the law. The article evaluates whether two recent developments will progress the goal of marine environmental protection. First, a number of recent international judicial decisions interpreting treaty and customary principles of international law have clarified and extended state environmental obligations. Second, negotiations for a new treaty on the protection and sustainable use of biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction offer hope that gaps in UNCLOS might be filled.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document