New subtribe Pachitinae (Orchideae) of Orchidaceae: Evidence from morphological and molecular analyses

Phytotaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 329 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
GUI-ZHEN CHEN ◽  
JIE HUANG ◽  
GUO-QIANG ZHANG ◽  
LIANG MA ◽  
SHI-PIN CHEN

The subtribal delimitation and relationships of Orchideae remain unresolved. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships among all subtribes of Orchideae were reconstructed, utilizing five plastid and two nuclear DNA sequences (rbcL, trnS-trnG, matK, trnL-F, psbA-trnH, Xdh and ITS) from 178 taxa of Orchideae. The combined results show that most clades are successively sister to the grade of clades representing antecedently accepted subtribes, but Pachites and Huttonaea do not belong to the previous classification of Disinae. In contrast, these two genera represent two additional isolated lineages. On this basis, a new subtribe, Pachitinae, is tentatively proposed to accommodate this taxon. Also, the subtribe Huttonaeinae Schltr. was recovered (1926: 568). In addition to the taxonomic treatment of this subtribe, the delimitation of many related subtribes in Orchideae is discussed.

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo A. Salazar ◽  
Lidia I. Cabrera ◽  
Santiago Madriñán ◽  
Mark W. Chase

2020 ◽  
Vol 194 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-99
Author(s):  
Inelia Escobar ◽  
Eduardo Ruiz-Ponce ◽  
Paula J Rudall ◽  
Michael F Fay ◽  
Oscar Toro-Núñez ◽  
...  

Abstract Gilliesieae are a South American tribe of Amaryllidaceae characterized by high floral diversity. Given different taxonomic interpretations and proposals for generic and specific relationships, a representative phylogenetic analysis is required to clarify the systematics of this group. The present study provides a framework for understanding phylogenetic relationships and contributing to the development of an appropriate taxonomic treatment of Gilliesieae. Molecular analyses, based on nuclear (ITS) and plastid DNA sequences (trnL-F and rbcL), resolve with strong support the monophyly of the tribe and the differentiation of two major clades. Clade I comprises the genera Gilliesia, Gethyum and Solaria and Clade II includes Miersia and Speea. These well-supported clades are mostly congruent with vegetative and karyotype characters rather than, e.g., floral symmetry. At the generic level, all molecular analyses reveal the paraphyly of Gilliesia and Miersia. Gethyum was found to be paraphyletic, resulting in the confirmation of Ancrumia as a distinct genus. Several instances of incongruent phylogenetic signals were found among data sets. The calibrated tree suggests a recent diversification of the tribe (Pliocene–Pleistocene), a contemporary process of speciation in which instances of hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting could explain patterns of paraphyly and incongruence of floral morphology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasaman Salmaki ◽  
Günther Heubl ◽  
Maximilian Weigend

AbstractStachydeae, comprising c. 470 species, are one of the most diverse and taxonomically puzzling groups in Lamioideae. In the present study, the phylogenetic relationships in the Eurystachys clade (a phylogenetic name for all genera attributed to Stachydeae except Melittis) were reconstructed utilizing nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences (nrETS, 5S-NTS) from 148 accessions in 12 genera. Our phylogenetic results recovered Stachys as paraphyletic with numerous traditionally recognized genera nested in it. A broadly defined Eurystachys clade, however, was monophyletic. Unlike previous studies, the present study was able to resolve the group into 12 well-supported clades, named here as (1) Eriostomum, (2) Stachys, (3) Prasium, (4) Setifolia, (5) Distantes, (6) Burgsdorfia, (7) Hesiodia, (8) Empedoclia, (9) Sideritis, (10) Marrubiastrum, (11) Swainsoniana and (12) Olisia. These 12 clades were formally named in a phylogenetic nomenclature for the Eurystachys clade. Several infrageneric units were retrieved as monophyletic, namely Sideritis sections Burgsdorfia, Empedoclia and Hesiodia, Sideritis subgenus Marrubiastrum and Stachys sections Eriostomum (including Stachys section Mucronata) and Setifolia. The findings of this study also provide the basis for a future formal classification, with two options: (1) splitting of the Eurystachys clade into 12 monophyletic genera, all of them based on pre-existing genus names and redefined to encompass additional taxa, but without clear morphological apomorphies; or (2) lumping of all segregates into a broadly defined Stachys, including widely recognized and well-defined segregates such as Prasium and Sideritis.


Zootaxa ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 1517 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK GLAW ◽  
ZOLTÁN T. NAGY ◽  
MIGUEL VENCES

Based on a specimen found at Montagne d'Ambre in northern Madagascar morphologically agreeing with Compsophis albiventris Mocquard, 1894, we report on the rediscovery of this enigmatic snake genus and species and its molecular phylogenetic relationships. Compsophis albiventris, considered to be the only representative of its genus and unreported since its original description, bears strong morphological similarities to species of Geodipsas Boulenger, 1896. A molecular phylogeny based on DNA sequences of three mitochondrial and nuclear genes (complete cytochrome b, fragments of 16S rRNA and c-mos) in Compsophis albiventris and three Geodipsas species corroborated close relationships between C. albiventris and Geodipsas boulengeri, and showed that the genera Compsophis and Geodipsas together form a monophyletic unit. Despite the general similarities, morphological data and chromatic features support the existence of two species groups, corresponding to Compsophis and Geodipsas. We consequently consider Geodipsas as a subgenus of Compsophis and transfer all species currently in Geodipsas into the genus Compsophis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 722-730
Author(s):  
Ana María Soriano Martínez ◽  
Gerardo A. Salazar ◽  
Patricia Dávila Aranda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document