Vernier Acuity Is Normal in Migraine, whereas Global Form and Global Motion Perception Are Not

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 3213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. McKendrick ◽  
David R. Badcock ◽  
Melissa Gurgone
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 887-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Giaschi ◽  
Amy Zwicker ◽  
Simon Au Young ◽  
Bruce Bjornson

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 645-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Mitchell ◽  
Jan Kennie ◽  
Diane Kung

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 675-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
CYNTHIA HALL-HARO ◽  
LYNNE KIORPES

AbstractWe studied the development of sensitivity to complex motion using plaid patterns. We hypothesized, based on neurophysiological data showing a dearth of pattern direction–selective (PDS) cells in area medial temporal (MT) of infant macaques, that sensitivity to pattern motion would develop later than other forms of global motion sensitivity. We tested 10 macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) ranging in age from 7 weeks to 109–160 weeks (adult). The monkeys discriminated horizontal from vertical pattern motion; sensitivity for one-dimensional (1D) direction discrimination and detection were tested as control tasks. The results show that pattern motion discrimination ability develops relatively late, between 10 and 18 weeks, while performance on the 1D control tasks was excellent at the earliest test ages. Plaid discrimination performance depends on both the speed and spatial scale of the underlying patterns. However, development is not limited by contrast sensitivity. These results support the idea that pattern motion perception depends on a different mechanism than other forms of global motion perception and are consistent with the idea that the representation of PDS neurons in MT may limit the development of complex motion perception.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 30-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Akin ◽  
C. Ozdem ◽  
S. Eroglu ◽  
D. T. Keskin ◽  
F. Fang ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXA I. RUPPERTSBERG ◽  
SOPHIE M. WUERGER ◽  
MARCO BERTAMINI

For over 30 years there has been a controversy over whether color-defined motion can be perceived by the human visual system. Some results suggest that there is no chromatic motion mechanism at all, whereas others do find evidence for a purely chromatic motion mechanism. Here we examine the chromatic input to global motion processing for a range of color directions in the photopic luminance range. We measure contrast thresholds for global motion identification and simple detection using sparse random-dot kinematograms. The results show a discrepancy between the two chromatic axes: whereas it is possible for observers to perform the global motion task for stimuli modulated along the red–green axis, we could not assess the contrast threshold required for stimuli modulated along the yellowish-violet axis. The contrast required for detection for both axes, however, are well below the contrasts required for global motion identification. We conclude that there is a significant red–green input to global motion processing providing further evidence for the involvement of the parvocellular pathway. The lack of S-cone input to global motion processing suggests that the koniocellular pathway mediates the detection but not the processing of complex motion for our parameter range.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Micheletti ◽  
Fleur Corbett ◽  
Janette Atkinson ◽  
Oliver Braddick ◽  
Paola Mattei ◽  
...  

Dorsal stream cortical networks underpin a cluster of visuomotor, visuospatial, and visual attention functions. Sensitivity to global coherence of motion and static form is considered a signature of visual cortical processing in the dorsal stream (motion) relative to the ventral stream (form). Poorer sensitivity to global motion compared to global static form has been found across a diverse range of neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting a “dorsal stream vulnerability.” However, previous studies of global coherence sensitivity in Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have shown conflicting findings. We examined two groups totalling 102 children with DCD (age 5–12 years), using the “Ball in the Grass” psychophysical test to compare sensitivity to global motion and global static form. Motor impairment was measured using the Movement-ABC (M-ABC). Global coherence sensitivity was compared with a typically developing control group (N = 69) in the same age range. Children with DCD showed impaired sensitivity to global motion (p = 0.002), but not global form (p = 0.695), compared to controls. Within the DCD group, motor impairment showed a significant linear relationship with global form sensitivity (p < 0.001). There was also a significant quadratic relationship between motor impairment and global motion sensitivity (p = 0.046), where poorer global motion sensitivity was only apparent with greater motor impairment. We suggest that two distinct visually related components, associated with global form and global motion sensitivity, contribute to DCD differentially over the range of severity of the disorder. Possible neural circuitry underlying these relationships is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document