pattern motion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

93
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Quaia ◽  
Incheol Kang ◽  
Bruce G Cumming

Direction selective neurons in primary visual cortex (area V1) are affected by the aperture problem, i.e., they are only sensitive to motion orthogonal to their preferred orientation. A solution to this problem first emerges in the middle temporal (MT) area, where a subset of neurons (called pattern cells) combine motion information across multiple orientations and directions, becoming sensitive to pattern motion direction. These cells are expected to play a prominent role in subsequent neural processing, but they are intermixed with cells that behave like V1 cells (component cells), and others that do not clearly fall in either group. The picture is further complicated by the finding that cells that behave like pattern cells with one type of pattern, might behave like component cells for another. We recorded from macaque MT neurons using multi-contact electrodes while presenting both type I and unikinetic plaids, in which the components were 1D noise patterns. We found that the indices that have been used in the past to classify neurons as pattern or component cells work poorly when the properties of the stimulus are not optimized for the cell being recorded, as is always the case with multi-contact arrays. We thus propose alternative measures, which considerably ameliorate the problem, and allow us to gain insights in the signals carried by individual MT neurons. We conclude that arranging cells along a component-to-pattern continuum is an oversimplification, and that the signals carried by individual cells only make sense when embodied in larger populations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 906 (2) ◽  
pp. L9
Author(s):  
Chengyan Xie ◽  
Bin Ren ◽  
Ruobing Dong ◽  
Laurent Pueyo ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Ruffio ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 497 (2) ◽  
pp. 2385-2392
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Matsumoto ◽  
Chi-Ho Chan ◽  
Tsvi Piran

ABSTRACT The Gravity Collaboration detected a near-infrared hotspot moving around Sgr A* during the 2018 July 22 flare. They fitted the partial loop the hotspot made on the sky with a circular Keplerian orbit of radius $\simeq 7.5\, r_{\rm g}$ around the supermassive black hole (BH), where rg is the gravitational radius. However, because the hotspot traversed the loop in a short time, models in which the hotspot tracks the motion of some fluid element tend to produce a best-fitting trajectory smaller than the observed loop. This is true for a circular Keplerian orbit, even when BH spin is accounted for, and for motion along a radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) streamline. A marginally bound geodesic suffers from the same problem; in addition, it is not clear what the origin of an object following the geodesic would be. The observed hotspot motion is more likely a pattern motion. Circular motion with $r\simeq 12.5\, r_\mathrm{g}$ and a super-Keplerian speed $\simeq 0.8\, c$ is a good fit. Such motion must be pattern motion because it cannot be explained by physical forces. The pattern speed is compatible with magnetohydrodynamic perturbations, provided that the magnetic field is sufficiently strong. Circular pattern motion of radius $\sim 20\, r_{\rm g}$ on a plane above the BH is an equally good alternative; in this case, the hotspot may be caused by a precessing outflow interacting with a surrounding disc. As all our fits have relatively large radii, we cannot constrain the BH spin using these observations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvin Zarei Eskikand ◽  
Tatiana Kameneva ◽  
Anthony N. Burkitt ◽  
David B. Grayden ◽  
Michael R. Ibbotson

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Sung Jun Joo ◽  
Devon A. Greer ◽  
Lawrence K. Cormack ◽  
Alexander C. Huk

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 190114
Author(s):  
William Curran ◽  
Lee Beattie ◽  
Delfina Bilello ◽  
Laura A. Coulter ◽  
Jade A. Currie ◽  
...  

Prior experience influences visual perception. For example, extended viewing of a moving stimulus results in the misperception of a subsequent stimulus's motion direction—the direction after-effect (DAE). There has been an ongoing debate regarding the locus of the neural mechanisms underlying the DAE. We know the mechanisms are cortical, but there is uncertainty about where in the visual cortex they are located—at relatively early local motion processing stages, or at later global motion stages. We used a unikinetic plaid as an adapting stimulus, then measured the DAE experienced with a drifting random dot test stimulus. A unikinetic plaid comprises a static grating superimposed on a drifting grating of a different orientation. Observers cannot see the true motion direction of the moving component; instead they see pattern motion running parallel to the static component. The pattern motion of unikinetic plaids is encoded at the global processing level—specifically, in cortical areas MT and MST—and the local motion component is encoded earlier. We measured the direction after-effect as a function of the plaid's local and pattern motion directions. The DAE was induced by the plaid's pattern motion, but not by its component motion. This points to the neural mechanisms underlying the DAE being located at the global motion processing level, and no earlier than area MT.


Perception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 735-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey M. Shain ◽  
J. Farley Norman

An experiment required younger and older adults to estimate coherent visual motion direction from multiple motion signals, where each motion signal was locally ambiguous with respect to the true direction of pattern motion. Thus, accurate performance required the successful integration of motion signals across space (i.e., accurate performance required solution of the aperture problem) . The observers viewed arrays of either 64 or 9 moving line segments; because these lines moved behind apertures, their individual local motions were ambiguous with respect to direction (i.e., were subject to the aperture problem). Following 2.4 seconds of pattern motion on each trial (true motion directions ranged over the entire range of 360° in the fronto-parallel plane), the observers estimated the coherent direction of motion. There was an effect of direction, such that cardinal directions of pattern motion were judged with less error than oblique directions. In addition, a large effect of aging occurred—The average absolute errors of the older observers were 46% and 30.4% higher in magnitude than those exhibited by the younger observers for the 64 and 9 aperture conditions, respectively. Finally, the observers’ precision markedly deteriorated as the number of apertures was reduced from 64 to 9.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document