motion processing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

773
(FIVE YEARS 123)

H-INDEX

68
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Auriane Duchemin ◽  
Martin Privat ◽  
Germán Sumbre

In the presence of moving visual stimuli, the majority of animals follow the Fourier motion energy (luminance), independently of other stimulus features (edges, contrast, etc.). While the behavioral response to Fourier motion has been studied in the past, how Fourier motion is represented and processed by sensory brain areas remains elusive. Here, we investigated how visual moving stimuli with or without the first Fourier component (square-wave signal or missing fundamental signal) are represented in the main visual regions of the zebrafish brain. First, we monitored the larva's optokinetic response (OKR) induced by square-wave and missing fundamental signals. Then, we used two-photon microscopy and GCaMP6f zebrafish larvae to monitor neuronal circuit dynamics in the optic tectum and the pretectum. We observed that both the optic tectum and the pretectum circuits responded to the square-wave gratings. However, only the pretectum responded specifically to the direction of the missing-fundamental signal. In addition, a group of neurons in the pretectum responded to the direction of the behavioral output (OKR), independently of the type of stimulus presented. Our results suggest that the optic tectum responds to the different features of the stimulus (e.g., contrast, spatial frequency, direction, etc.), but does not respond to the direction of motion if the motion information is not coherent (e.g., the luminance and the edges and contrast in the missing-fundamental signal). On the other hand, the pretectum mainly responds to the motion of the stimulus based on the Fourier energy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gi-Yeul Bae ◽  
Steven J Luck

Computational models for motion perception suggest a possibility that read-out of motion signal can yield the perception of opposite direction of the true stimulus motion direction. However, this possibility was not obvious in a standard 2AFC motion discrimination (e.g., leftward vs.rightward). By allowing the motion direction to vary over 360° in typical random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) displays, and by asking observers to estimate the exact direction of motion, we were able to detect the presence of opposite-direction motion perception in RDKs.This opposite-direction motion perception was replicable across multiple display types andfeedback conditions, and participants had greater confidence in their opposite-direction responses than in true guess responses. When we fed RDKs into a computational model of motion processing, we found that the model estimated substantial motion activity in the direction opposite to the coherent stimulus direction, even though no such motion was objectively present in the stimuli, suggesting that the opposite-direction motion perception may be a consequenceof the properties of motion-selective neurons in visual cortex. Together, these results demonstrate that the perception of opposite-direction motion in RDKs is consistent with the known properties of the visual system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Jin Kim ◽  
Beth Peterson ◽  
Joanna Crook ◽  
Hannah Joo ◽  
Jiajia Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract From mouse to primate, there is a striking discontinuity in our current understanding of the neural coding of motion direction. In non-primate mammals, directionally selective cell types and circuits are a signature feature of the retina, situated at the earliest stage of the visual process1,2. In primates, by contrast, direction selectivity is a hallmark of motion processing areas in visual cortex3,4, but has not been found in the retina, despite significant effort5,6. Here we combined functional recordings of light-evoked responses and connectomic reconstruction to identify diverse direction-selective cell types in the macaque monkey retina with distinctive physiological properties and synaptic motifs. This circuitry includes an ON-OFF ganglion cell type, a spiking, ON-OFF poly-axonal amacrine cell and the starburst amacrine cell, all of which show direction selectivity. Moreover, we found unexpectedly that macaque starburst cells possess a strong, non-GABAergic, antagonistic surround mediated by input from excitatory bipolar cells that is critical for the generation of radial motion sensitivity in these cells. Our findings open a new door to investigation of a novel circuitry that computes motion direction in the primate visual system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merve Kiniklioglu ◽  
Huseyin Boyaci

Here we investigate how the extent of spatial attention affects center-surround interaction in visual motion processing. To do so, we measured motion direction discrimination thresholds in humans using drifting gratings and two attention conditions. Under the narrow attention condition, attention was limited to the central part of the visual stimulus, whereas under the wide attention condition, it was directed to both the center and surround of the stimulus. We found stronger surround suppression under the wide attention condition. The magnitude of the attention effect increased with the size of the surround when the stimulus had low contrast, but did not change when it had high contrast. Results also showed that attention had a weaker effect when the center and surround gratings drifted in opposite directions. Next, to establish a link between the behavioral results and the neuronal response characteristics, we performed computer simulations using the divisive normalization model. Our simulations showed that the model can successfully predict the observed behavioral results using parameters derived from the medial temporal (MT) area of the cortex. These findings reveal the critical role of spatial attention on surround suppression and establish a link between neuronal activity and behavior. Further, these results also suggest that the reduced surround suppression found in certain clinical disorders (e.g., schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder) may be caused by abnormal attention mechanisms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (14) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Arvind Chandna ◽  
Nikolay Nichiporuk ◽  
Spero Nicholas ◽  
Ram Kumar ◽  
Anthony M. Norcia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kit D Longden ◽  
Edward M Rogers ◽  
Aljoscha Nern ◽  
Heather Dionne ◽  
Michael B Reiser

Color and motion are used by many species to identify salient moving objects. They are processed largely independently, but color contributes to motion processing in humans, for example, enabling moving colored objects to be detected when their luminance matches the background. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected, additional contribution of color to motion vision in Drosophila. We show that behavioral ON-motion responses are more sensitive to UV than for OFF-motion, and we identify cellular pathways connecting UV-sensitive R7 photoreceptors to ON and OFF-motion-sensitive T4 and T5 cells, using neurogenetics and calcium imaging. Remarkably, the synergy of color and motion vision enhances the detection of approaching UV discs, but not green discs with the same chromatic contrast, and we show how this generalizes for visual systems with ON and OFF pathways. Our results provide a computational and circuit basis for how color enhances motion vision to favor the detection of saliently colored objects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 10238
Author(s):  
Olaf Holowenko ◽  
Clemens Troll ◽  
Steffen Ihlenfeldt ◽  
Jens-Peter Majschak

In processing machines, technological tasks are implemented using suitable processing solutions. Those processing solutions can in turn have very different characteristics and specific advantages and disadvantages, e.g., concerning sensitivity to changing operating speed. In state-of-the-art processing machine controls, executing one single processing solution is supported. The execution of various processing solutions together and the combination of their advantages is currently not supported at all. In this article, a motion control approach is discussed that allows combining seemingly incompatible process solutions for a given technological task into a hybrid process solution, using the example of processing machines. The objective of this approach is to increase the achievable process window of the machine in terms of operating speed. It is shown that combining different process solutions can merge their advantages and compensate for their disadvantages. The article brings together the lessons learned from previous work in a new application to exploit advantages and compensate for disadvantages.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1401
Author(s):  
Kirsten Hötting ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Rogge ◽  
Laura A. Kuhne ◽  
Brigitte Röder

Balance training interventions over several months have been shown to improve spatial cognitive functions and to induce structural plasticity in brain regions associated with visual-vestibular self-motion processing. In the present cross-sectional study, we tested whether long-term balance practice is associated with better spatial cognition. To this end, spatial perspective-taking abilities were compared between balance experts (n = 40) practicing sports such as gymnastics, acrobatics or slacklining for at least four hours a week for the last two years, endurance athletes (n = 38) and sedentary healthy individuals (n = 58). The balance group showed better performance in a dynamic balance task compared to both the endurance group and the sedentary group. Furthermore, the balance group outperformed the sedentary group in a spatial perspective-taking task. A regression analysis across all participants revealed a positive association between individual balance performance and spatial perspective-taking abilities. Groups did not differ in executive functions, and individual balance performance did not correlate with executive functions, suggesting a specific association between balance skills and spatial cognition. The results are in line with theories of embodied cognition, assuming that sensorimotor experience shapes cognitive functions.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258490
Author(s):  
Serena Castellotti ◽  
Lisa Scipioni ◽  
Stefano Mastandrea ◽  
Maria Michela Del Viva

Motion can be perceived in static images, such as photos and figurative paintings, representing realistic subjects in motion, with or without directional information (e.g., motion blur or speed lines). Motion impression can be achieved even in non-realistic static images such as motion illusions and abstract paintings. It has been shown that visual motion processing affects the diameter of the pupil, responding differently to real, illusory, and implied motion in photographs (IM). It has been suggested that these different effects might be due to top-down modulations from different cortical areas underlying their processing. It is worthwhile to investigate pupillary response to figurative paintings, since they require an even higher level of interpretation than photos representing the same kind of subjects, given the complexity of cognitive processes involved in the aesthetic experience. Also, pupil responses to abstract paintings allows to study the effect of IM perception in representations devoid of real-life motion cues. We measured pupil responses to IM in figurative and abstract artworks depicting static and dynamic scenes, as rated by a large group of individuals not participating in the following experiment. Since the pupillary response is modulated by the subjective image interpretation, a motion rating test has been used to correct individual pupil data according to whether participants actually perceived the presence of motion in the paintings. Pupil responses to movies showing figurative and abstract subjects, and to motion illusions were also measured, to compare real and illusory motion with painted IM. Movies, both figurative and abstract, elicit the largest pupillary dilation of all static stimuli, whereas motion illusions cause the smallest pupil size, as previously shown. Interestingly, pupil responses to IM depend on the paintings’ style. Figurative paintings depicting moving subjects cause more dilation than those representing static figures, and pupil size increases with the strength of IM, as already found with realistic photos. The opposite effect is obtained with abstract artworks. Abstract paintings depicting motion produce less dilation than those depicting stillness. In any case, these results reflect the individual subjective perception of dynamism, as the very same paintings can induce opposite responses in observer which interpreted it as static or dynamic. Overall, our data show that pupil size depends on high-level interpretation of motion in paintings, even when they do not represent real-world scenes. Our findings further suggest that the pupil is modulated by multiple top-down cortical mechanisms, involving the processing of motion, attention, memory, imagination, and other cognitive functions necessary for enjoying a complete aesthetic experience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-142
Author(s):  
Hartono Hartono ◽  
Kiki Prawiroredjo

Home automation dengan pengenalan isyarat gerakan tangan dapat memberi kemudahan kepada pemilik rumah untuk mengontrol peralatan elektronik rumahnya terutama kepada para penyandang disabilitas yang memiliki keterbatasan untuk berjalan. Pada penelitian sebelumnya, perangkat pembaca isyarat berupa sarung tangan yang dilengkapi sensor akselerometer dan giroskop. Perangkat tersebut kurang fleksibel saat digunakan untuk melakukan aktivitas lain secara bersamaan sehingga dibutuhkan perangkat yang lebih wearable. Penelitian ini mengembangkan home automation system dengan pengenalan isyarat gerakan tangan menggunakan Motion Processing Unit (MPU). Perangkat dibuat dalam bentuk jam tangan digital sehingga lebih praktis saat digunakan. Sensor MPU akan mendeteksi isyarat gerakan tangan dimana setiap isyarat gerakan diproses oleh Arduino Nano dan didefinisikan sebagai suatu perintah yang akan dikirim ke perangkat penerima melalui modul radio frekuensi. Setelah diuji perangkat yang dibuat dapat mengontrol peralatan elektronik rumah dengan isyarat gerakan tangan sesuai spesifikasi yang diinginkan dengan nilai error sebesar 2,5%. Sedangkan jarak maksimum perangkat pemancar yang masih dapat direspon oleh penerima adalah 10 m tanpa penghalang.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document