scholarly journals Effects of Cyclic Intraocular Pressure on Conventional Outflow Facility

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata F. Ramos ◽  
W. Daniel Stamer
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 1858
Author(s):  
Anna I. Dastiridou ◽  
Evangelia E. Tsironi ◽  
Miltiadis K. Tsilimbaris ◽  
Harilaos Ginis ◽  
Nikos Karyotakis ◽  
...  

SciVee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouya Alaghband ◽  
Evgenia Kanonidou ◽  
Laura Beltran-Agullo ◽  
Darryl R. Overby ◽  
K Sheng Lim

1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel S. Schuman ◽  
Kristine Erickson ◽  
James A. Nathanson

2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-490
Author(s):  
James C.H. Tan ◽  
Julie A. Kiland ◽  
Jose M. Gonzalez ◽  
B’Ann T. Gabelt ◽  
Donna M. Peters ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theonitsa Panagiotoglou ◽  
Miltiadis Tsilimbaris ◽  
Harilaos Ginis ◽  
Nikos Karyotakis ◽  
Vaggelis Georgiou ◽  
...  

Purpose.To compare ocular rigidity (OR) and outflow facility (C) in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and control subjects.Methods. Twenty-four patients with NPDR (NPDR group) and 24 controls (control group) undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled. NPDR group was further divided into patients with mild NPDR (NPDR1-group) and patients with moderate and/or severe NPDR (NPDR2-group). After cannulation of the anterior chamber, a computer-controlled device was used to infuse saline and increase the intraocular pressure (IOP) in a stepping procedure from 15 to 40 mmHg. Ocular rigidity and outflow facility coefficients were estimated from IOP and volume recordings.Results. Ocular rigidity was 0.0205 μL−1in NPDR group and 0.0202 μL−1in control group (P=0.942). In NPDR1-group, OR was 0.017 μL−1and in NPDR2-group it was 0.025μL−1(P=0.192). Outflow facility was 0.120 μL/min/mmHg in NPDR-group compared to 0.153 μL/min/mmHg in the control group at an IOP of 35 mmHg (P=0.151). There was no difference in C between NPDR1-group and NPDR2-group (P=0.709).Conclusions. No statistically significant differences in ocular rigidity and outflow facility could be documented between diabetic patients and controls. No difference in OR and C was detected between mild NPDR and severe NPDR.


1970 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean K. Lauber ◽  
James E. Boyd ◽  
T.A.S. Boyd

1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Stjernschantz ◽  
Risto Uusitalo ◽  
Arto Palkama ◽  
Harri Niskanen ◽  
Gunnar Johansson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document