scholarly journals Radiative Flux Estimation from a Broadband Radiometer Using Synthetic Angular Models in the EarthCARE Mission Framework. Part II: Evaluation

2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 1714-1731
Author(s):  
Carlos Domenech ◽  
Ernesto Lopez-Baeza ◽  
David P. Donovan ◽  
Tobias Wehr
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
High Anisotropy ◽  
Flux Estimation ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Averaged Model ◽  
Theoretical Results

AbstractThe instantaneous top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance-to-flux conversion for the broadband radiometer (BBR) on board the Earth Clouds, Aerosols, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) was assessed in Part I of this paper, by developing theoretical angular distribution models (ADMs) specifically designed for the instrument viewing configuration. This paper validates the BBR ADMs by comparing derived flux estimates with flux retrievals obtained from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Terra models. A CERES BBR-like database is employed in the assessment, which is an optimum dataset to validate the BBR algorithms and to determine the benefits of the multiangular conversion procedures in the BBR instrument. The validation of theoretical results with empirical data is essential to prepare the conversion algorithms prior to the launch of EarthCARE. This paper demonstrates that the application of a linear combination method is not recommended when outgoing radiances do not follow the response modeled in the radiative transfer calculations. An effective radiance averaged model outperforms all other developed models, in terms of the coefficient of variation of the root-mean-square error, in the validation study of the shortwave (SW) regime (clear sky 1.9%; cloudy 7.1%) while an effective radiance along-track model obtains the best comparisons for the longwave (LW) regime (clear sky 1.4%; cloudy 1.5%). The evaluation of the multiangular models with scenes with high anisotropy shows that multiview flux conversion algorithms can statistically improve CERES ADM results when CERES flux discrepancies of a target are higher than 4 W m−2 in the LW domain and SW clear-sky scenes and higher than 20 W m−2 in scenes with cloudy conditions.

scholarly journals On the Use of Geophysical Parameters for the Top-of-Atmosphere Shortwave Clear-Sky Radiance-to-Flux Conversion in EarthCARE

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Tornow ◽  
C. Domenech ◽  
J. Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Permutation Test ◽  
Climate Modeling ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Max Planck ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Dynamic Surface ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Fresh Snow ◽  
Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution

AbstractWe have investigated whether differences across Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) top-of-atmosphere (TOA) clear-sky angular distribution models, estimated separately over regional (1° × 1° longitude–latitude) and temporal (monthly) bins above land, can be explained by geophysical parameters from Max Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology, version 1 (MAC-v1), ECMWF twentieth-century reanalysis (ERA-20C), and a MODIS bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF)/albedo/nadir BRDF-adjusted reflectance (NBAR) Climate Modeling Grid (CMG) gap-filled products (MCD43GF) climatology. Our research aimed to dissolve binning and to isolate inherent properties or indicators of such properties, which govern the TOA radiance-to-flux conversion in the absence of clouds. We collocated over seven million clear-sky footprints from CERES Single Scanner Footprint (SSF), edition 4, data with above geophysical auxiliary data. Looking at data per surface type and per scattering direction—as perceived by the broadband radiometer (BBR) on board Earth Clouds, Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE)—we identified optimal subsets of geophysical parameters using two different methods: random forest regression followed by a permutation test and multiple linear regression combined with the genetic algorithm. Using optimal subsets, we then trained artificial neural networks (ANNs). Flux error standard deviations on unseen test data were on average 2.7–4.0 W m−2, well below the 10 W m−2 flux accuracy threshold defined for the mission, with the exception of footprints containing fresh snow. Dynamic surface types (i.e., fresh snow and sea ice) required simpler ANN input sets to guarantee mission-worthy flux estimates, especially over footprints consisting of several surface types.

scholarly journals Top-of-Atmosphere Direct Radiative Effect of Aerosols over Global Oceans from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 3506-3526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Information Service ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Radiative Effect ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Global Oceans

Abstract The direct radiative effect of aerosols (DREA) is defined as the difference between radiative fluxes in the absence and presence of aerosols. In this study, the direct radiative effect of aerosols is estimated for 46 months (March 2000–December 2003) of merged Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Terra global measurements over ocean. This analysis includes the contribution from clear regions in both clear and partly cloudy CERES footprints. MODIS–CERES narrow-to-broadband regressions are developed to convert clear-sky MODIS narrowband radiances to broadband shortwave (SW) radiances, and CERES clear-sky angular distribution models (ADMs) are used to estimate the corresponding top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes that are needed to determine the DREA. Clear-sky MODIS pixels are identified using two independent cloud masks: (i) the NOAA/National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS) algorithm that is used for inferring aerosol properties from MODIS on the CERES Single Scanner Footprint TOA/Surface Fluxes and Clouds (SSF) product (NOAA SSF); and (ii) the standard algorithm that is used by the MODIS aerosol group to produce the MODIS aerosol product (MOD04). Over global oceans, direct radiative cooling by aerosols for clear scenes that are identified from MOD04 is estimated to be 40% larger than for clear scenes from NOAA SSF (5.5 compared to 3.8 W m−2). Regionally, differences are largest in areas that are affected by dust aerosol, such as oceanic regions that are adjacent to the Sahara and Saudi Arabian deserts, and in northern Pacific Ocean regions that are influenced by dust transported from Asia. The net total-sky (clear and cloudy) DREA is negative (cooling) and is estimated to be −2.0 W m−2 from MOD04, and −1.6 W m−2 from NOAA SSF. The DREA is shown to have pronounced seasonal cycles in the Northern Hemisphere and large year-to-year fluctuations near deserts. However, no systematic trend in deseasonalized anomalies of the DREA is observed over the 46-month time series that is considered.

scholarly journals Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from the CERES instruments: validation

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 4489-4536 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Su ◽  
J. Corbett ◽  
Z. Eitzen ◽  
L. Liang
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Direct Integration ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
Rms Error ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Scene Identification

Abstract. Radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument are fundamental variables for understanding the Earth's energy balance and how it changes with time. TOA radiative fluxes are derived from the CERES radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes using direct integration and flux consistency tests. Direct integration tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean TOA shortwave (SW) flux is less than 0.2 W m−2 and the RMS error is less than 1.1 W m−2. The bias and RMS error are very similar between Terra and Aqua. The bias in regional monthly mean TOA LW fluxes is less than 0.5 W m−2 and the RMS error is less than 0.8 W m−2 for both Terra and Aqua. The accuracy of the TOA instantaneous flux is assessed by performing tests using fluxes inverted from nadir- and oblique-viewing angles using CERES along-track observations and temporally- and spatially-matched MODIS observations, and using fluxes inverted from multi-angle MISR observations. The TOA instantaneous SW flux uncertainties are about 2.3% (1.9 W m−2) over clear ocean, 1.6% (4.5 W m−2) over clear land, and 2.0% (6.0 W m−2) over clear snow/ice; and are about 3.3% (9.0 W m−2), 2.7% (8.4 W m−2), and 3.7% (9.9 W m−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA SW flux uncertainties are generally larger for thin broken clouds than for moderate and thick overcast clouds. The TOA instantaneous daytime LW flux uncertainties are 0.5% (1.5 W m−2), 0.8% (2.4 W m−2), and 0.7 % (1.3 W m−2) over clear ocean, land, and snow/ice; and are about 1.5% (3.5 W m−2), 1.0% (2.9 W m−2), and 1.1 % (2.1 W m−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA instantaneous nighttime LW flux uncertainties are about 0.5–1% (< 2.0 W m−2) for all surface types. Flux uncertainties caused by errors in scene identification are also assessed by using the collocated CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES and MODIS data product. Errors in scene identification tend to underestimate TOA SW flux by about 0.6 W m−2 and overestimate TOA daytime (nighttime) LW flux by 0.4 (0.2) W m−2 when all CERES viewing angles are considered.

scholarly journals Accounting for the effects of sastrugi in the CERES clear-sky Antarctic shortwave angular distribution models

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3163-3175 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Corbett ◽  
W. Su
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Statistical Relationships ◽  
Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution

Abstract. The Cloud and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments on NASA's Terra, Aqua and Soumi NPP satellites are used to provide a long-term measurement of Earth's energy budget. To accomplish this, the radiances measured by the instruments must be inverted to fluxes by the use of a scene-type-dependent angular distribution model (ADM). For permanent snow scenes over Antarctica, shortwave (SW) ADMs are created by compositing radiance measurements over the full viewing zenith and azimuth range. However, the presence of small-scale wind blown roughness features called sastrugi cause the BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) of the snow to vary significantly based upon the solar azimuth angle and location. This can result in monthly regional biases between −12 and 7.5 Wm−2 in the inverted TOA (top-of-atmosphere) SW flux. The bias is assessed by comparing the CERES shortwave fluxes derived from nadir observations with those from all viewing zenith angles, as the sastrugi affect fluxes inverted from the oblique viewing angles more than for the nadir viewing angles. In this paper we further describe the clear-sky Antarctic ADMs from Su et al. (2015). These ADMs account for the sastrugi effect by using measurements from the Multi-Angle Imaging Spectro-Radiometer (MISR) instrument to derive statistical relationships between radiance from different viewing angles. We show here that these ADMs reduce the bias and artifacts in the CERES SW flux caused by sastrugi, both locally and Antarctic-wide. The regional monthly biases from sastrugi are reduced to between −5 and 7 Wm−2, and the monthly-mean biases over Antarctica are reduced by up to 0.64 Wm−2, a decrease of 74 %. These improved ADMs are used as part of the Edition 4 CERES SSF (Single Scanner Footprint) data.

scholarly journals Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: validation

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3297-3313 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Su ◽  
J. Corbett ◽  
Z. Eitzen ◽  
L. Liang
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Energy Balance ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Direct Integration ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Scene Identification

Abstract. Radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument are fundamental variables for understanding the Earth's energy balance and how it changes with time. TOA radiative fluxes are derived from the CERES radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes using direct integration and flux consistency tests. Direct integration tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean TOA shortwave (SW) flux is less than 0.2 Wm−2 and the RMSE is less than 1.1 Wm−2. The bias and RMSE are very similar between Terra and Aqua. The bias in regional monthly mean TOA LW fluxes is less than 0.5 Wm−2 and the RMSE is less than 0.8 Wm−2 for both Terra and Aqua. The accuracy of the TOA instantaneous flux is assessed by performing tests using fluxes inverted from nadir- and oblique-viewing angles using CERES along-track observations and temporally and spatially matched MODIS observations, and using fluxes inverted from multi-angle MISR observations. The averaged TOA instantaneous SW flux uncertainties from these two tests are about 2.3 % (1.9 Wm−2) over clear ocean, 1.6 % (4.5 Wm−2) over clear land, and 2.0 % (6.0 Wm−2) over clear snow/ice; and are about 3.3 % (9.0 Wm−2), 2.7 % (8.4 Wm−2), and 3.7 % (9.9 Wm−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA SW flux uncertainties are generally larger for thin broken clouds than for moderate and thick overcast clouds. The TOA instantaneous daytime LW flux uncertainties derived from the CERES-MODIS test are 0.5 % (1.5 Wm−2), 0.8 % (2.4 Wm−2), and 0.7 % (1.3 Wm−2) over clear ocean, land, and snow/ice; and are about 1.5 % (3.5 Wm−2), 1.0 % (2.9 Wm−2), and 1.1 % (2.1 Wm−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA instantaneous nighttime LW flux uncertainties are about 0.5–1 % (< 2.0 Wm−2) for all surface types. Flux uncertainties caused by errors in scene identification are also assessed by using the collocated CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES and MODIS data product. Errors in scene identification tend to underestimate TOA SW flux by about 0.6 Wm−2 and overestimate TOA daytime (nighttime) LW flux by 0.4 (0.2) Wm−2 when all CERES viewing angles are considered.

scholarly journals Comparisons of Clear-Sky Outgoing Far-IR Flux Inferred from Satellite Observations and Computed from the Three Most Recent Reanalysis Products

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuhong Chen ◽  
Xianglei Huang ◽  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Heli Wei
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Energy System ◽  
High Elevation ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder ◽  
Clear Sky

Abstract The far-IR spectrum plays an important role in the earth’s radiation budget and remote sensing. The authors compare the near-global (80°S–80°N) outgoing clear-sky far-IR flux inferred from the collocated Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations in 2004 with the counterparts computed from reanalysis datasets subsampled along the same satellite trajectories. The three most recent reanalyses are examined: the ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), NASA Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Application (MERRA), and NOAA/NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR). Following a previous study by X. Huang et al., clear-sky spectral angular distribution models (ADMs) are developed for five of the CERES land surface scene types as well as for the extratropical oceans. The outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) directly estimated from the AIRS radiances using the authors’ algorithm agrees well with the OLR in the collocated CERES Single Satellite Footprint (SSF) dataset. The daytime difference is 0.96 ±2.02 W m−2, and the nighttime difference is 0.86 ±1.61 W m−2. To a large extent, the far-IR flux derived in this way agrees with those directly computed from three reanalyses. The near-global averaged differences between reanalyses and observations tend to be slightly positive (0.66%–1.15%) over 0–400 cm−1 and slightly negative (−0.89% to −0.44%) over 400–600 cm−1. For all three reanalyses, the spatial distributions of such differences show the largest discrepancies over the high-elevation areas during the daytime but not during the nighttime, suggesting discrepancies in the diurnal variation of such areas among different datasets. The composite differences with respect to temperature or precipitable water suggest large discrepancies for cold and humid scenes.

Evaluation of net shortwave radiation over China with a regional climate model

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-163
Author(s):  
X Liu ◽  
Y Kang ◽  
Q Liu ◽  
Z Guo ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Monsoon Region ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Sky Conditions

The regional climate model RegCM version 4.6, developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis, was used to simulate the radiation budget over China. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite data were utilized to evaluate the simulation results based on 4 radiative components: net shortwave (NSW) radiation at the surface of the earth and top of the atmosphere (TOA) under all-sky and clear-sky conditions. The performance of the model for low-value areas of NSW was superior to that for high-value areas. NSW at the surface and TOA under all-sky conditions was significantly underestimated; the spatial distribution of the bias was negative in the north and positive in the south, bounded by 25°N for the annual and seasonal averaged difference maps. Compared with the all-sky condition, the simulation effect under clear-sky conditions was significantly better, which indicates that the cloud fraction is the key factor affecting the accuracy of the simulation. In particular, the bias of the TOA NSW under the clear-sky condition was <±10 W m-2 in the eastern areas. The performance of the model was better over the eastern monsoon region in winter and autumn for surface NSW under clear-sky conditions, which may be related to different levels of air pollution during each season. Among the 3 areas, the regional average biases overall were largest (negative) over the Qinghai-Tibet alpine region and smallest over the eastern monsoon region.

scholarly journals Assessing Stability of CERES-FM3 Daytime Longwave Unfiltered Radiance with AIRS Radiances

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianglei Huang ◽  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Huiwen Chuang
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Spectrally Resolved ◽  
Independent Assessment ◽  
Flight Model ◽  
Bound Estimation

Abstract Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) daytime longwave (LW) radiances are determined from the difference between a total (TOT) channel (0.3–200 μm) measurement and a shortwave (SW) channel (0.3–5 μm) measurement, while nighttime LW radiances are obtained directly from the TOT channel. This means that a drift in the SW channel or the SW portion of the TOT channel could impact the daytime longwave radiances, but not the nighttime ones. This study evaluates daytime and nighttime CERES LW radiances for a possible secular drift in CERES LW observations using spectral radiances observed by Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). By examining the coincidental AIRS and CERES Flight Model 3 (FM3) measurements over the tropical clear-sky oceans for all of January and July months since 2005, a secular drift of about −0.11% yr−1 in the daytime CERES-FM3 longwave unfiltered radiance can be identified in the CERES Single Scanner Footprint (SSF) Edition 2 product. This provides an upper-bound estimation for the drift in daytime outgoing longwave radiation, which is approximately −0.323 W m−2 yr−1. This estimation is consistent with the independent assessment concluded by the CERES calibration team. Such secular drift has been greatly reduced in the latest CERES SSF Edition 3 product. Comparisons are conducted for the CERES window channel as well, and it shows essentially no drift. This study serves as a practical example illustrating how the measurements of spectrally resolved radiances can be used to help evaluate data products from other narrowband or broadband measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document