scholarly journals The Eddy–Mean Flow Interaction and the Intrusion of Western Boundary Current into the South China Sea–Type Basin in an Idealized Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 2493-2527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linhao Zhong ◽  
Lijuan Hua ◽  
Dehai Luo

AbstractIn this paper, an ideal model of the role of mesoscale eddies in the Kuroshio intruding into the South China Sea (SCS) is developed, which represents the northwestern Pacific and the SCS as two rectangular basins connected by a gap. In the case of considering only intrinsic ocean variability, a time-dependent western boundary current (WBC) driven by steady wind is modeled under both eddy-resolving and noneddy-resolving resolutions. Almost all simulated WBCs intrude into the adjacent sea in the form of the Loop Current with multiple-state transitions and eddy-shedding processes, which have aperiodic variations on intraseasonal or interannual scales, determined by the eddy-induced WBC variation. For the parameters considered in this paper, the WBC intrusion exhibits a 30–90-day cycle in the presence of the subgrid-scale eddy forcing (SSEF) but a 300–500-day cycle in the absence of SSEF. Moreover, the roles of the grid-scale and subgrid-scale eddies in the WBC intrusion are studied by using the dynamically consistent decomposition developed by Berloff. Based on the large-sample composite analysis of the intrusion events, it is found that the Loop Current intensity is mainly determined by baroclinic processes through grid-scale, eddy–eddy interaction and subgrid-scale, eddy–flow interaction. The intrusion position and period are mainly regulated by the SSEF to the west of gap, where the balance between relative vorticity and isopycnal thickness SSEFs determines eddy detachment. Generally, the relative vorticity SSEF therein tends to induce WBC intrusion. However, the isopycnal thickness SSEF tends to induce eddy shedding, and WBC retreat thus determines the intrusion cycle through counteracting relative vorticity SSEF.

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guohong Fang ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
Yue Fang ◽  
Wendong Fang

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 6983-6996
Author(s):  
Yangyang Lu ◽  
Zuozhu Wen ◽  
Dalin Shi ◽  
Wenfang Lin ◽  
Sophie Bonnet ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 795-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Quan ◽  
Huijie Xue ◽  
Huiling Qin ◽  
Xuezhi Zeng ◽  
Shiqiu Peng

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Zhou ◽  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Jiwei Tian ◽  
Xiaolong Zhao ◽  
Yuchao Zhu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2953-2963
Author(s):  
Muping Zhou ◽  
Guihua Wang ◽  
Wenhu Liu ◽  
Changlin Chen

AbstractThe existence of a deep western boundary current (DWBC) in the South China Sea (SCS) was verified by direct observations from three current moorings deployed from September 2015 to September 2018. The average current speeds observed in the DWBC were around 1 cm s−1 along the northern boundary and 3 cm s−1 along the western boundary. The DWBC demonstrates significant intraseasonal variability in the 30–120-day-period band, which may come from the variability in the Luzon overflow or the eddies in the deep SCS forced by a stable Luzon overflow. In addition, observations found that this DWBC along the northern boundary can reverse its direction meridionally in the spring. Model results suggest that if the Luzon overflow decreases one-third of its typical transport, this current reversal can occur. This behavior can be explained through “relaxation” theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document