Narcotic Antagonists: The Search for Long-Acting Preparations. NIDA Research Monograph 4; Young Men and Drugs—A Nationwide Survey. NIDA Research Monograph 5

1978 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-631
Author(s):  
JOHN N. CHAPPEL
1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Dykstra ◽  
D. E. McMillan ◽  
L. S. Harris

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 897-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. R. Woodland ◽  
Seymour Yolles ◽  
David A. Blake ◽  
Martin Helrich ◽  
Francis J. Meyer

1975 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 348-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seymour Yolles ◽  
Thomas D. Leafe ◽  
James H.R. Woodland ◽  
Francis J. Meyer

2003 ◽  
Vol 284 (5) ◽  
pp. E1009-E1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda J. Woodhouse ◽  
Suzanne Reisz-Porszasz ◽  
Marjan Javanbakht ◽  
Thomas W. Storer ◽  
Martin Lee ◽  
...  

Considerable heterogeneity exists in the anabolic response to androgen administration; however, the factors that contribute to variation in an individual's anabolic response to androgens remain unknown. We investigated whether testosterone dose and/or any combination of baseline variables, including concentrations of hormones, age, body composition, muscle function, and morphometry or polymorphisms in androgen receptor could explain the variability in anabolic response to testosterone. Fifty-four young men were treated with a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and one of five doses (25, 50, 125, 300, or 600 mg/wk) of testosterone enanthate (TE) for 20 wk. Anabolic response was defined as a change in whole body fat-free mass (FFM) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), appendicular FFM (by DEXA), and thigh muscle volume (by magnetic resonance imaging) during TE treatment. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the subset of baseline measures that best explained the variability in anabolic response to testosterone supplementation. The three-variable model of TE dose, age, and baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level explained 67% of the variance in change in whole body FFM. Change in appendicular FFM was best explained (64% of the variance) by the linear combination of TE dose, baseline PSA, and leg press strength, whereas TE dose, log of the ratio of luteinizing hormone to testosterone concentration, and age explained 66% of the variation in change in thigh muscle volume. The models were further validated by using Ridge analysis and cross-validation in data subsets. Only the model using testosterone dose, age, and PSA was a consistent predictor of change in FFM in subset analyses. The length of CAG tract was only a weak predictor of change in thigh muscle volume and lean body mass. Hence, the anabolic response of healthy, young men to exogenous testosterone administration can largely be predicted by the testosterone dose.


Author(s):  
S. Yolles ◽  
John Eldridge ◽  
Thomas Leafe ◽  
J. H. R. Woodland ◽  
David R. Blake ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 4 (49) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
J. H. R. WOODLAND ◽  
S. YOLLES ◽  
D. A. BLAKE ◽  
M. HELRICH ◽  
F. J. MEYER

Author(s):  
John A. O'Donnell ◽  
Harwin L. Voss ◽  
Richard R. Clayton ◽  
Gerald T. Slatin ◽  
Robin G. W. Room
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e114700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Meyers ◽  
Kristina Rodriguez ◽  
Robert W. Moeller ◽  
Ilana Gratch ◽  
Martin Markowitz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document