Responding to a Major Disaster: The Trauma Assessment and Support Clinic in Beirut

2021 ◽  
pp. appi.ps.2020008
Author(s):  
Bernadette Medawar ◽  
Olivia Shabb ◽  
Samer El Hayek ◽  
Joumana Ammar ◽  
Saydeh Hammouche ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
H. S. Resnick ◽  
C. L. Best ◽  
D. G. Kilpatrick ◽  
J. R. Freedy ◽  
S. A. Falsetti
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Caelan Soma ◽  
Jenny Sloan ◽  
Sara Garipey ◽  
Gabriela Mueller ◽  
Rebecca Gerlach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201
Author(s):  
Jeanne Cummings ◽  
Steven L. Baumann

In this paper, the authors suggest that shame is a barrier to many patients’ willingness to disclose their history of trauma to nurses and other members of the healthcare team and that the clinicians participate in this withholding of information because of their experience of vicarious shame. The authors propose that shame and vicarious shame reduce the accuracy of assessment, limit the nurse–patient relationship, and reduce the ability of the healthcare teams to accurately diagnose and treat patients. Shame as a barrier to trauma assessment is also considered in light of the Roy adaptation model and from a global perspective. Implications for education, research, and nursing practice are discussed.


1972 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT E. GOLD ◽  
HELEN C. REDMAN

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Suginaka ◽  
Ken Okamoto ◽  
Yohei Hirano ◽  
Yuichi Fukumoto ◽  
Miki Morikawa ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionThe catastrophic Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 created a crisis in a university-affiliated hospital by disrupting the water supply for 10 days. In response, this study was conducted to analyze water use and prioritize water consumption in each department of the hospital by applying a business impact analysis (BIA). Identifying the minimum amount of water necessary for continuing operations during a disaster was an additional goal.ProblemWater is essential for many hospital operations and disaster-ready policies must be in place for the safety and continued care of patients.MethodsA team of doctors, nurses, and office workers in the hospital devised a BIA questionnaire to examine all operations using water. The questionnaire included department name, operation name, suggested substitutes for water, and the estimated daily amount of water consumption. Operations were placed in one of three ranks (S, A, or B) depending on the impact on patients and the need for operational continuity. Recovery time objective (RTO), which is equivalent to the maximum tolerable period of disruption, was determined. Furthermore, the actual use of water and the efficiency of substitute methods, practiced during the water-disrupted periods, were verified in each operation.ResultsThere were 24 activities using water in eight departments, and the estimated water consumption in the hospital was 326 (SD = 17) m3per day: 64 (SD = 3) m3for S (20%), 167 (SD = 8) m3for A (51%), and 95 (SD = 5) m3for B operations (29%). During the disruption, the hospital had about 520 m3of available water. When the RTO was set to four days, the amount of water available would have been 130 m3per day. During the crisis, 81% of the substitute methods were used for the S and A operations.ConclusionThis is the first study to identify and prioritize hospital operations necessary for the efficient continuation of medical treatment during suspension of the water supply by applying a BIA. Understanding the priority of operations and the minimum daily water requirement for each operation is important for a hospital in the event of an unexpected adverse situation, such as a major disaster.SuginakaH,OkamotoK,HiranoY,FukumotoY,MorikawaM,OodeY,SumiY,InoueY,MatsudaS,TanakaH.Hospital disaster response using business impact analysis.Prehosp Disaster Med.2014;29(5):1-8.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document