Use of Community Support Services by Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Psychotic Disorders

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Shaw ◽  
Thomas L. Patterson ◽  
Shirley J. Semple ◽  
Maureen C. Halpain ◽  
William L. Koch ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 910-911
Author(s):  
Matthew Yau ◽  
Christine Sheppard ◽  
Jocelyn Charles ◽  
Andrea Austen ◽  
Sander Hitzig

Abstract Community support services are an integral component of aging in place. In social housing, older adult tenants struggle to access these services due to the siloed nature of housing and health services. This study aims to describe the relationship between community support services and social housing for older adults and examine ways to optimize delivery. Data on government-funded community support services delivered to 74 seniors’ social housing buildings in Toronto, Ontario was analyzed. Neighbourhood profile data for each building was also collected, and correlational analyses were used to examine the link between neighbourhood characteristics and service delivery. Fifty-six community agencies provided 5,976 units of services across 17 service categories, most commonly mental health supports, case management and congregate dining. On average, each building was supported by nine agencies that provided 80 units of service across 10 service categories. Buildings in neighbourhoods with a higher proportion of low-income older adults had more agencies providing on-site services (r = .275, p < .05), while those in neighbourhoods with more immigrants (r = -.417, p < .01), non-English speakers (r = -.325, p < .01), and visible minorities (r = -.381, p < .01) received fewer services. Findings point to a lack of coordination between service providers, with multiple agencies offering duplicative services within the same building. Vulnerable seniors from equity-seeking groups, including those who do not speak English and recent immigrants, may be excluded from many services, and future service delivery for seniors should strive to address disparities in availability and access.


CJEM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Leyenaar ◽  
Brent McLeod ◽  
Aaron Jones ◽  
Audrey-Anne Brousseau ◽  
Eric Mercier ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The aim for this study was to provide information about how community paramedicine home visit programs best “navigate” their role delivering preventative care to frequent 9-1-1 users by describing demographic and clinical characteristics of their patients and comparing them to existing community care populations. Methods Our study used secondary data from standardized assessment instruments used in the delivery of home care, community support services, and community paramedicine home visit programs in Ontario. Identical assessment items from each instrument enabled comparisons of demographic, clinical, and social characteristics of community-dwelling older adults using descriptive statistics and z-tests. Results Data were analyzed for 29,938 home care clients, 13,782 community support services clients, and 136 community paramedicine patients. Differences were observed in proportions of individuals living alone between community paramedicine patients versus home care clients and community support clients (47.8%, 33.8%, and 59.9% respectively). We found higher proportions of community paramedicine patients with multiple chronic disease (87%, compared to 63% and 42%) and mental health-related conditions (43.4%, compared to 26.2% and 18.8% for depression, as an example). Conclusion When using existing community care populations as a reference group, it appears that patients seen in community paramedicine home visit programs are a distinct sub-group of the community-dwelling older adult population with more complex comorbidities, possibly exacerbated by mental illness and social isolation from living alone. Community paramedicine programs may serve as a sentinel support opportunity for patients whose health conditions are not being addressed through timely access to other existing care providers. Protocol registration ISRCTN 58273216.


2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Patterson ◽  
Brent T. Mausbach ◽  
Christine McKibbin ◽  
Sherry Goldman ◽  
Jesus Bucardo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelly D. Oelke ◽  
Kaela Schill ◽  
Carolyn Szostak ◽  
Betty Brown ◽  
Susana Caxaj ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien Tay ◽  
Jie Jin Wang ◽  
Richard Lindley ◽  
Ee-Munn Chia ◽  
Peter Landau ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-404
Author(s):  
Fay Wright

ABSTRACTThe paper reports on a study carried out in 1990 for the Department of Health looking at the development of local authority multi-purpose residential homes for elderly people in England and Wales. A national survey showed that one in five public sector residential homes for elderly people would soon be multi-purpose. This proportion could be expected to increase in the 1990S. Many of these homes had become the centre for virtually all the community support services for elderly people in the neighbourhood. Despite some obvious management advantages in making use of residential home facilities for older people in the community, there have to be serious reservations about a multi-purpose model. Case studies in six multi-purpose homes suggest that residents themselves may gain little or nothing from this arrangement. Few interact with elderly people from the neighbourhood in the day centre. So much activity on the premises meant that invasions of residents' privacy and space were common.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document