Supracricoid Hemilaryngopharyngectomy

1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Laccourreye ◽  
J. Lacau St Guily ◽  
A. Fabre ◽  
D. Brasnu ◽  
M. Menard

The supracricoid hemilaryngopharyngectomy consists of resection of the supracricoid hemilarynx and ipsilateral pyriform sinus. Two hundred forty patients underwent this procedure from 1964 through 1983. Two hundred twenty-two patients had no airway impairment, and 204 recovered normal deglutition. The local recurrence rate was 5.2%. Indications for the procedure are carcinoma of the supracricoid upper part of the pyriform sinus and carcinoma of the lateral laryngeal margin with normal vocal cord mobility.

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. S66-S67
Author(s):  
Layal El-Asir ◽  
Faizan Jabbar ◽  
George Boundouki ◽  
Clive Griffith ◽  
James Harvey

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (13) ◽  
pp. 1944-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A.M. Bramer ◽  
A.A. Abudu ◽  
R.J. Grimer ◽  
S.R. Carter ◽  
R.M. Tillman

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 361-365
Author(s):  
Masaaki Ito

AbstractThe evolution over the past 20 years of anal preservation in rectal cancer surgery has been truly remarkable. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) reported by Schiessel in 1994 in Australia has been shown to enable anal preservation even for cancers quite close to the anus. In Japan, ISR via the detachment of the anal canal between the internal and external sphincters and excision of the internal sphincter first began to be practiced in the latter half of 1990. A multicenter Phase II trial of ISR in Japan suggested that 70% of the cases had relatively good function with less than 10 points of Wexner score but around 10% had severe incontinence that would not be improved for long term. The primary end point of the clinical study, 3-year local recurrence rate, was 13.2% across the overall cohort (T1, 0%; T2, 6.9%; and T3, 21.6%). When ISR is performed on T1/T2 rectal cancers, sufficient circumferential resection margin can be obtained even without preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and local recurrence rate was acceptably low. Based on these evidences, ISR is a currently important, standard treatment option among anal-preserving surgeries for T1/T2 low-lying rectal cancers. In Japan, a feasibility study (LapRC trial) of laparoscopic ISR on Stage 0 and Stage 1 low rectal cancer showed excellent outcomes. A prospective Phase II clinical trial targeting low rectal cancers within 5 cm from the anal verge (ultimate trial) is being performed and awaiting the results in near future.


Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (03) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Kuwai ◽  
Takuya Yamada ◽  
Tatsuya Toyokawa ◽  
Hiroaki Iwase ◽  
Tomohiro Kudo ◽  
...  

Background Cold polypectomy has been increasingly used to remove diminutive colorectal polyps. We evaluated the local recurrence rate of diminutive polyps at the 1-year follow-up after cold forceps polypectomy (CFP). Methods In a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study, patients with diminutive colorectal polyps ( ≤ 5 mm) were treated by CFP using jumbo forceps followed by magnified narrow-band imaging (NBI). Patients were assessed for local recurrence at 1-year follow-up. Risk factors associated with local recurrence were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results Overall, 955 lesions were resected in 471 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up. The endoscopic complete resection rate was 99.4 %. Immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 0.8 % and 0.2 % of cases, respectively, with no perforations observed. Local recurrence occurred in 2.1 % of cases at the 1-year follow-up. Univariable analyses indicated that polyps > 3 mm (P < 0.01) and immediate bleeding (P = 0.04) were significantly associated with local recurrence. A trend was observed for patients ≥ 65 years (P = 0.06) and fractional resection (P = 0.09). Multivariable analyses confirmed that lesions > 3 mm were significantly associated with local recurrence (odds ratio 3.4, P = 0.02). Conclusions CFP with jumbo forceps followed by NBI-magnified observation had a low local recurrence rate and is an acceptable therapeutic option for diminutive colorectal polyps. Although we recommend limiting the use of CFP with jumbo forceps to polyps ≤ 3 mm in size, future comparative studies are needed to make recommendations on cold polypectomy using either forceps or snares as the preferred approach for diminutive polyp resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document