New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program: A Progress Report

1985 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Pearson
Keyword(s):  
Program Design ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Summative Evaluation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Selective Screening ◽  
Public Defenders ◽  
Intensive Supervision ◽  
Multiple Contacts

This is a progress report on the first year of operation of New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program (ISP). The program design includes, among other components, very selective screening of applicants and multiple contacts with each offender every week. Results of a survey of judges, prosecutors, and public defenders on ISP are outlined. A summative evaluation would be premature at this time because only a handful of the 226 offenders admitted thus far into ISP have completed a full year in the program. However, preliminary indications of program accomplishments, including employment and rates of recidivism, are very promising.

The first year of teaming - A progress report

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
BARRY WALDMAN ◽  
PHILIP HARSHA
Keyword(s):  
Progress Report ◽  
First Year

scholarly journals Board 3: Engineering Technology Scholars-IMProving Retention and Student Success (ETS-IMPRESS): First Year Progress Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser Alaraje ◽  
Lorelle Meadows ◽  
Laura Fiss ◽  
Susan Amato-Henderson ◽  
Guy Hembroff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Student Success ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
First Year ◽  
Engineering Technology

scholarly journals A First-year Progress Report on "Collaborative Research Using Low-cost Desktop Learning Modules to Educate Diverse Undergraduate Communities in Engineering"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn Dahlke ◽  
Kitana Kaiphanliam ◽  
Bernard Van Wie ◽  
David Thiessen ◽  
Prashanta Dutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
First Year ◽  
Learning Modules

scholarly journals The UK great bustard Otis tarda reintroduction trial: a 5-year progress report

Oryx ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Burnside ◽  
Ian Carter ◽  
Alasdair Dawes ◽  
David Waters ◽  
Leigh Lock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Release Site ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
Adult Survival ◽  
First Year ◽  
Founder Population ◽  
Trial Period ◽  
Great Bustard ◽  
Otis Tarda ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The 19Th Century

AbstractThe great bustard Otis tarda became extinct in the UK during the 19th century due to a combination of factors, including hunting, egg collection and changes in agriculture. In 2003 a 10-year licence was granted to begin a trial to reintroduce the species back to the UK. Here we report on the first 5 years of the trial and assess the progress made towards establishing a founder population. From April 2004 to September 2009 a total of 102 great bustard chicks were imported from Russia and 86 released on Salisbury Plain. Monitoring showed that post-release survival was 18% in the first year following release, and that mortality of released bustards was mainly attributable to predation and collisions. Estimated adult survival was 74%, although the sample size was small. All known surviving great bustards are faithful to the surroundings of the release site, returning throughout the year. A lek has been established where males have been observed displaying to females. The first nesting attempt was in 2007, and in 2009 two females aged 3 and 4 years successfully nested, fledging one chick each. Models incorporating the new demographic estimates suggest that at the end of the 10-year trial period the project can expect to have 8–26 adults as a founder population.

scholarly journals Indonesian Stratigraphic Nomenclature revision: The first progress report

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Herman Darman ◽  
Dwandari Ralanarko ◽  
Sugeng Sapto Surjono
Keyword(s):  
Short Communication ◽  
Progress Report ◽  
First Year ◽  
Team Meeting ◽  
The Third ◽  
Work Programme ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Stratigraphic Nomenclature

A team was formed by the Indonesian Association of Geologist (IAGI) in early 2021 to revisit the Indonesian Stratigraphic Nomenclature which was issued in 1996. After 25 years many experts find that the document needs to be updated. The team is a mix of geologists with both academic and industry background. Several representatives from the Geological Agency who are involved in the Stratigraphic Lexicon document were also invited in the discussion. The team meeting was set on a regular basis to evaluate the existing nomenclature and look on areas for improvement. In each meeting the team will discuss a certain section of the nomenclature document. A three years work programme was set and reported on this article. In the first year the team will investigate areas for improvement, followed by revising necessary content in the second year. Implementation and promoting the nomenclature are planned for the third year.This short communication aims to engage a wider community on the process in revisiting the Indonesian Stratigraphic Nomenclature. Several examples of discussion topics in the meetings were included in this article. Readers will see potential areas for improvement and the team are open for suggestions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document