Looking at Team Improvised Adaptation Through a Paradoxical Lens: The Role of Team Plasticity

2021 ◽  
pp. 002188632110374
Author(s):  
António C.M. Abrantes ◽  
Ana M. Passos ◽  
Miguel P. e Cunha ◽  
Sílvia A. da Silva

When time is of the essence and teams face unexpected contextual changes, they must adapt quickly, sometimes even in real time, that is, they may have to improvise. This paper adopts an inductive approach to explore how teams decide to engage in improvised adaptation, and what happens during those processes for improvisation to be successful. The study analyzes improvisation from the perspective of paradox theory and identifies six paradoxical tensions driven by these contexts: deployment, development, temporal, procedural, structural, and behavioral tensions. We propose a dynamic equilibrium model of team improvised adaptation that leads to team plasticity. By properly managing the paradoxical tensions emerging from the convergence of design and execution, teams become more plastic and able to cope with sudden change. These findings contribute to adaptation and improvisation literatures by delving into the adaptation process under the temporal and material confluence of design and execution.

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 403-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Knight ◽  
Sotirios Paroutis

How do paradoxical tensions become salient in organizations over time? Ambidexterity and paradox studies have, thus far, primarily focused on how tensions inside organizations are managed after they have been rendered salient for actors. Using a longitudinal, embedded case study of four strategic business units within a media organization, we theorize the role of the top management team leader’s practices in enabling tensions to become salient for their respective lower-level managers when there are initial differences in how tensions are interpreted across levels. Our findings extend a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing by adding interpretive context as an enabling condition that shapes the emergence of salience through the provision of a constellation of cues that guide sensemaking. Informed by a practice-based perspective on paradox, we also contribute a conceptual model of leadership as practice, and outline the implications for ambidexterity studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. 1414-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Tsunoyama ◽  
Kazuyo Suzuki ◽  
Miwako Masugi-Tokita ◽  
Hiroo Nakajima ◽  
Yuichiro Manabe ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 665a
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Komuro ◽  
Naoyuki Miyashita ◽  
Takaharu Mori ◽  
Eiro Muneyuki ◽  
Takashi Saitoh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole C. Robb ◽  
Aartjan J.W. te Velthuis ◽  
Ervin Fodor ◽  
Achillefs N. Kapanidis

ABSTRACTThe viral RNA (vRNA) genome of influenza viruses is replicated by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) via a complementary RNA (cRNA) intermediate. The vRNA promoter can adopt multiple conformations when bound by the RNAP. However, the dynamics, determinants, and biological role of these conformations are unknown; further, little is known about cRNA promoter conformations. To probe the RNA conformations adopted during initial replication, we monitored single, surface-immobilised vRNA and cRNA initiation complexes in real-time. Our results show that, while the 3’ terminus of the vRNA promoter exists in dynamic equilibrium between pre-initiation and initiation conformations, the cRNA promoter exhibited very limited dynamics. Two residues in the proximal 3’ region of the cRNA promoter (residues absent in the vRNA promoter) allowed the cRNA template strand to reach further into the active site, limiting promoter dynamics. Our results highlight promoter-dependent differences in influenza initiation mechanisms, and advance our understanding of virus replication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document