Distribution of Practice Combined with Observational Learning Has Time Dependent Effects on Motor Skill Acquisition

2020 ◽  
pp. 003151252098124
Author(s):  
Olave E. Krigolson ◽  
Thomas D. Ferguson ◽  
Francisco L. Colino ◽  
Gordon Binsted

Studies of the benefits of a distributed practice schedule on motor skill acquisition have typically found that distribution of practice results in better learning. However, less research has focused on how the benefits of distributed practice are impacted by timing during acquisition. To examine how timing of skill acquisition interacts with distribution of practice we had two groups of participants complete either an extensive massed or distributed training schedule to learn a speed stacking sequence across ten sessions. For participants in both groups, we provided observational learning to facilitate skill acquisition. Analysis of speed stacking time on a retention test revealed an overall benefit for the distributed relative to the massed practice group. Interestingly, our analysis of the benefits of distributed practice during training only showed performance benefits in the early session (session one) and later sessions (sessions eight, nine, and ten) of skill acquisition but not mid-way through it (sessions two through seven). Our results support previous findings highlighting the learning benefits of a distributed practice schedule but suggest that these benefits occur differentially throughout acquisition. Our work also replicates research demonstrating that observational learning is more beneficial when it is yoked to actual practice.

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 825-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Janelle ◽  
Jamy D. Champenoy ◽  
Stephen A. Coombes ◽  
Melanie B. Mousseau

1976 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Chasey

The stabilometer task was used to study the difference between massed practice and distributed practice on initial acquisition, retention, and relearning of a gross motor skill by mentally retarded boys. 72 subjects were randomly assigned to either one massed practice group or one of three distributed practice groups with varying intertrial rest intervals. All subjects were retested for retention and relearning after 8 wk. of no practice. The results indicated that distributed practice was superior to massed practice for initial skill acquisition. Retention was superior, favoring the group given distributed practice, but no significant differences were found between groups for relearning, indicating that the advantage of distributed practice may be temporary and that it is a performance rather than a learning factor.


Author(s):  
Juan Pedro Fuentes ◽  
Silvia Pulido ◽  
Noemí Morales ◽  
Ruperto Menayo

Purpose This study aims to determine the effect of the distribution of practice on learning the forehand shot in tennis. Method Twenty-four beginner tennis players participated in the study (13 males and 11 female; 8.63 ± 0.92 years old). The players were separated after groups -massed practice ( N = 12) and distributed practice ( N = 12). Each group practiced the forehand shot for 12 sessions, 4 series per session and 10 trials/series (6 weeks). The accuracy and efficacy were measured through one post-test and one retest, carried out 2 weeks after the last learning session. Results Significant improvements in accuracy between the pre-test and post-test ( p=.004) and between pre-test and re-test ( p=.006) were found in the massed practice group. Significant improvements in accuracy between the pre-test and post-test ( p=.002) and between pre-test and re-test ( p=.001) were found in the distributed practice group. No significant differences were found between groups but there was a favourable trend toward better learning in both, with improved accuracy and efficacy. Conclusion The motor learning through the distribution of practice among children has been noted, with a significant improvement in the skill acquisition of the forehand shot in the two groups. The results are useful because they clear up the doubts about how to plan the teaching of this stroke in tennis, confirming the suitability of carrying out learning programs based on massed and distributed practice.


1997 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
GW Knight ◽  
PJ Guenzel ◽  
P Feil

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle V. Thompson ◽  
Janet L. Utschig ◽  
Mikaela K. Vaughan ◽  
Marc V. Richard ◽  
Benjamin A. Clegg

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashvin Shah ◽  
Andrew G. Barto ◽  
Andrew H. Fagg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document