scholarly journals Short-course vasoconstrictors are adequate for esophageal variceal bleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 003685042110317
Author(s):  
Jen-Hao Yeh ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
Ru-Yi Huang ◽  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Wen-Lun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Endoscopic Variceal Ligation ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Significant Difference

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with vasoconstrictors has been recommended for acute esophageal variceal bleeding. However, the optimal duration of vasoconstrictors after EVL is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of short-course vasoconstrictors (≤3 days) versus standard combination (3–5 days). A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases with subsequent meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were 5-day rebleeding, mortality, and treatment failure rates. A risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval is used for outcome comparison. Nine randomized studies with 838 patients were included. The initial hemostasis (96.8% vs 97.4%, p = 0.919), 5-day rebleeding (11.2% vs 8.3%, RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.62–1.76), mortality (0 vs 1.3%, RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.10–2.39), and treatment failure (7.4% vs 5.9%, RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.48–2.49) were similar in both groups. Subgroup analysis suggested EVL alone had no significant difference of 5-day re-bleeding (15.9% vs 7.1%, RR = 2.25, 95% CI = 0.87–5.77), mortality (0 vs 0.7%, RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.08–6.03), treatment failure (9.6% vs 6.7%, RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.54–3.75) compared to standard combination. Clinical heterogeneity was found for the rebleeding rate for the subgroup during sensitivity analysis. EVL with short-course vasoconstrictors is highly efficacious for esophageal variceal bleeding. Further studies are required to determine the genuine need of subsequent vasoconstrictor after successful EVL.

scholarly journals Necessity of vasoconstrictors for esophageal variceal bleeding after endoscopic ligation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Hao Yeh ◽  
Gin Lo ◽  
Ru-Yi Huang ◽  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Wen-Lun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Endoscopic Variceal Ligation ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding

Abstract BackgroundSeveral recent trials have suggested that the need for vasoconstrictors for preventing esophageal variceal bleeding may be considerably reduced after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL). However, comprehensive systematic reviews on this topic are hardly available. MethodsA meticulous literature review and meta-analysis were conducted using the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were initial hemostasis, rebleeding, mortality, and treatment failure within 5 days, and secondary outcomes were 6-week mortality and adverse events. ResultsFive randomized trials with 423 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that the following outcomes were similar in groups that received only EVL and a standard combination regimen: initial hemostasis (97.6% vs. 98.0%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97–1.02), 5-day rebleeding (15.9% vs. 6.6%, RR = 2.25, 95% CI = 0.87–5.77), treatment failure (9.6% vs. 6.7%, RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.54––3.75), 5-day mortality rates (0 vs. 0.7%, RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.09–6.87), and 6-week mortality rates (2.9% vs. 3.0%, RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.25–3.13). By contrast, sensitivity analysis suggested obvious clinical heterogeneity in 5-day rebleeding although an outlier study was identified. ConclusionIn patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding after EVL, 5-day and 6-week mortality rates were similar regardless of vasoconstrictor use. However, considering the controversial 5-day rebleeding rate, short course of vasoconstrictor use based on current evidence may be reasonable.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Ligation Combined With Sclerotherapy for Patients With Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Su ◽  
Huilin Zhang ◽  
Maifang Ren ◽  
Yanan Xing ◽  
Yuefei Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Injection Sclerotherapy ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Endoscopic Variceal Ligation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Endoscopic Injection ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation + endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EVL+EIS) to control acute variceal bleeding (AVB).Methods: Online databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc, VIP, and Wanfang, were searched to identify the studies comparing the differences between EVB+EIS and EVB, EIS from the inception of the databases up to December 30, 2020. STATA 13.0 was used for the meta-analysis.Results: A total of eight studies involving 595 patients (317 patients in the EVL group and 278 patients in the EVL+EIS group) were included. The results of the meta-analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the efficacy of acute bleeding control (P = 0.981), overall rebleeding (P = 0.415), variceal eradication (P = 0.960), and overall mortality (P = 0.314), but a significant difference was noted in the overall complications (P = 0.01).Conclusion: EVL is superior to the combination of EVL and EIS in safety, while no statistically significant differences were detected in efficacy. Further studies should be designed with a large sample size, multiple centers, and randomized controlled trials to assess both clinical interventions.

scholarly journals Mo1531 – Early (Pre-Emptive) Tips Versus Conventional Treatment for Prophylaxis of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1333-S-1334
Author(s):  
Shadi Hamdeh ◽  
Osama Altayar ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
Jihan Fathallah ◽  
Mojtaba S. Olyaee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding

Balloon Tamponade and Esophageal Stenting for Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (02) ◽  
pp. 178-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Rodrigues ◽  
Andrés Cárdenas ◽  
Àngels Escorsell ◽  
Jaime Bosch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Balloon Tamponade ◽  
Acute Variceal Bleeding

AbstractFailure to control variceal bleeding with current recommendations occurs in 10 to 20% of cases. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzes the experience, results, and complications of “bridge” therapies for failure to control acute variceal bleeding: balloon tamponade and esophageal stents. The main outcomes assessed were failure to control bleeding and mortality in the short-term and medium-term follow-up, and adverse events. Balloon tamponade studies had a pooled rate of short-term failure to control bleeding of 35.5%, and adverse events in over 20% of cases; 9.7% resulting in death. Stenting failed to control bleeding in the short term and medium term in 12.7 and 21.5% of cases of severe or refractory variceal bleeding, respectively, despite stent migration in 23.8% of cases. Medium-term mortality rates were similar in both therapies. Although only one trial compared these treatments, the available evidence consistently supports that stents serve as a better and safer bridge therapy in refractory acute variceal bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document