scholarly journals Communalism Moderates the Association Between Racial Centrality and Emergency Department Use for Sickle Cell Disease Pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Bediako ◽  
Chey Harris

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder that predominantly affects people of African descent. However, there is limited information on how social and cultural contexts affect SCD-related health care use. We explored whether communalism moderated the relation between racial centrality and emergency department use for SCD pain in a sample of 62 adults who were seen at a comprehensive clinic. Bivariate analyses showed a significant correlation between racial centrality and emergency department use ( r = −.30, p = .02). Pain-adjusted regression analyses indicated a moderating effect of communalism ( b = .77, p < .01) such that an inverse association between racial centrality and emergency department use was observed only at mean and low levels of communalism. Additional studies are needed to replicate these findings with larger samples. There is also a need for further studies that elucidate the role of culturally centered coping strategies on health care use in this patient group.

2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merida M. Grant ◽  
Karen M. Gil ◽  
Marnita Y. Floyd ◽  
Mary Abrams

1992 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Gil ◽  
Mary R. Abrams ◽  
George Phillips ◽  
David A. Williams

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Abiola Oladapo ◽  
Elyse Swallow ◽  
Allison Briggs ◽  
Miriam L. Zichlin ◽  
Bjorn L Mellgard

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder affecting ~100,000 individuals in the US. SCD is considered a chronic, lifelong condition that requires comprehensive management. Vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) are the most common complications of SCD, resulting in intense pain and potential irreversible organ damage. The objective of this study was to characterize the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with SCD. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted using data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare-Supplemental Claims database (July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2018). Patients were included if they met the following criteria: ≥2 diagnoses of SCD on different claims between July 1, 2013 and January 1, 2017, ≥6 years of age on January 1, 2017, and continuous enrollment throughout the 1-year study period (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017). Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographics (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] and other selected comorbidities). In addition, the following outcomes were assessed: the proportion of patients who experienced ≥1 VOC, the frequency of VOCs by care setting, the duration of inpatient VOCs, the monthly VOC risk, and the time between subsequent VOCs. Results: A total of 8174 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 40.8 (±19.5) years and 63.5% of the patients were female. The mean (±SD) CCI was 0.6 (±1.3), with chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, and stroke identified as the most common comorbidities. Approximately 20% (n=1659) of patients experienced ≥1 VOC and the mean monthly VOC risk was 0.07 (±0.19). Among patients with ≥1 VOC, the mean (±SD) number of VOCs was 5.2 (±7.7) and the median (interquartile range) time from first to second VOC was 2.4 (0.5-8.2) months. Approximately 18% (n=1461) of patients experienced ≥1 VOC managed in an outpatient setting and 10% (n=844) of patients experienced ≥1 VOC managed in an inpatient setting. Approximately 8% (n=646) of patients experienced ≥1 inpatient and ≥1 outpatient VOC during the study period. Among patients with ≥1 outpatient VOC, the mean (±SD) number of outpatient VOCs was 4.6 (±6.9); among patients with ≥1 inpatient VOC, the mean (±SD) number of inpatient VOCs was 2.2 (±2.3) and the mean (±SD) inpatient VOC duration was 6.6 (±6.4) days. Conclusions: VOCs are common complications of SCD, affecting a subset of patients who often experience recurrent VOC episodes requiring professional health care. VOCs are associated with a significant disease burden on the patient and, potentially, the health care system. Disclosures Oladapo: Takeda:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Swallow:Analysis Group, Inc.:Current Employment.Briggs:Analysis Group, Inc.:Current Employment.Zichlin:BMS:Other: Employee of Analysis Group Inc., which received consulting fees.Mellgard:Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Gil ◽  
James W. Carson ◽  
Laura S. Porter ◽  
Cindy Scipio ◽  
Shawn M. Bediako ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4722-4722
Author(s):  
Zachary Liederman ◽  
Naa Kwarley Quartey ◽  
Richard Ward ◽  
Janet Papadakos

Abstract Background: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients are amongst the most frequent utilizers of the emergency department (ED) for acute vaso-occlusive pain episodes ("crisis"). Unfortunately, ED SCD care often fails to meet guideline recommendations. This results in preventable morbidity and mortality as well as substantial resource utilization. Current care interventions across multiple domains have not led to sustained improvements, likely due in part to negative attitudes and beliefs among health care providers (HCP). Novel mechanisms of physician education are required to improve outcomes. An emerging method of education in SCD is the use of patients as "just in time" teachers. We refer to this as Patient Directed Physician Education (PDPE) and define it as a broad range of activities in which patients relay actionable information to HCPs in the clinical setting. While there is a growing body of research supporting patients as teachers, no group has specifically examined point of care PDPE in a SCD population. Objective: This study seeks to understand the current use and feasibility of SCD PDPE in the ED. Methods: This is a multi-centered, prospective descriptive qualitative design with semi-structured, audio taped individual interviews. SCD patients and ED physicians across Ontario, Canada were recruited to participate in the study through purposeful sampling. Qualitative analysis was performed using phenomenological inquiry, which encompasses qualitative approaches to inductively and holistically understand a human phenomenon (i.e. teaching and learning in sickle cell disease) in a context specific setting. Results: In total, 11 patients and 8 physicians participated in the study. Patient ages ranged from 21-67 and physician years in practice ranged from 3-21. The patient group predominately consisted of female Black Canadians (81%) while the physician group was mainly Caucasian males (63%) but did include representation from other ethnicities. There was significant variability in both self-described disease severity (patients) and frequency of SCD exposure (physicians). Both groups assessed themselves as having good to excellent SCD general knowledge or clinical acumen respectively. Within the qualitative analysis both groups responded favourably to PDPE and expressed confidence in its feasibility and ability to improve ED care. Barriers to the implementation of PDPE were expressed across three major domains; 1) patient factors, 2) health care worker factors, and 3) health care system factors. The ability of patients to present reliable health information was highlighted as a key factor in the success of PDPE by both groups. However, physicians and patients had strikingly different perspectives towards the inherent challenges. Patients identified triage delays and difficulty speaking due to intractable pain as the major barriers to shared decision making. Conversely, physicians largely did not appreciate these elements of the vaso-occlusive pain episode experience and instead expressed concerns regarding patient credibility, particularly in the context of high dose opiates. Overt racism or the perception of patient as "drug seeker" were not identified as major themes from either group. There was consensus towards written patient care plans, corroborating electronic health records, and collaboration from SCD experts as mechanisms to bridge the SCD patient/ED physician divide and facilitate PDPE. In addition, despite not being directly involved in PDPE, nurses experienced in SCD management were consistently noted to be instrumental in supporting the patient-physician interaction. Conclusions: Patient directed physician education is a feasible and novel SCD care innovation with support from both patients and ED physicians. Successful implementation will require credible educational adjuncts (e.g. patient pocket cards, care plans) and support from ED nurses and SCD experts. Our findings will serve as part of a continuum of research to engage patients as partners in improving SCD knowledge and care outcomes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document