Thinking globally, acting locally? The women’s sector, international human rights mechanisms and politics in Northern Ireland

Politics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Thomson

Literature considering international human rights mechanisms stresses that they have the best chance of success when they are closest to ideas which already exist within national contexts. Research which addresses women’s human rights bodies, such as the Convention Against All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), argues that they function best when reinterpreted to fit the local context. Yet, situations where this domestic norm translation is occurring, but policy change is not achieved, have received little consideration. Why do some contexts, even where norm translation occurs, resist policy change? This article examines Northern Ireland, where these women’s rights bodies are used extensively in the women’s sector, but where change has not occurred. It argues that norm translation is not the only important factor, and that a greater consideration of local political structures is needed in order to more fully explain policy resistance.

ICL Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irène Couzigou

AbstractThis article assesses whether the United Nations Security Council must respect human rights under international law when acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. It argues that the Security Council has to respect human rights enshrined in those human rights treaties drawn up under the United Nations’ auspices and in non-peremptory customary international law, when this is not incompatible with the Security Council’s objective of maintaining or restoring international peace and security. The analysis also argues however that the Security Council must comply with peremptory international human rights, with no exception. The paper concludes that Chapter VII action by the Security Council is limited only to a small extent by international human rights standards.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Pierson

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on ‘women, peace and security’ was passed in 2000 to recognise and enhance women’s participation in peace-building. The Resolution has growing global significance in conflicted societies yet there is limited analysis of its implementation in specific social contexts. Utilising feminist theory on gender in conflicted societies and original empirical evidence from key grassroots community activists in Northern Ireland, I will consider the potential of the 1325 framework as a tool for conceptualising and achieving gender security and equality. This article contributes to an understanding of the importance of deep contextual interpretation for implementation of the women, peace and security agenda and argues for a feminist intersectional interpretation of the Resolution to enable its transformative potential for both peace-building and gender equality.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 455-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letta Tayler

Since 2013, at least 47 countries from Australia to Uzbekistan have enacted laws and regulations to stop their citizens from joining extremist armed groups such as the Islamic State. A majority of these “foreign terrorist fighter” measures were enacted to comply with United Nations Security Council Resolution 2178 of September 2014. In a grave omission, Resolution 2178 does not limit the actions that governments may designate as “terrorism” or “terrorist”, leaving them free to craft dangerously open-ended definitions. At risk are non-violent protesters, journalists, political opponents, civil society members, and ethnic or religious groups, particularly Muslims. The “foreign terrorist fighter” measures that could target them include warrantless searches, prolonged detention without charge, travel bans, loss of dual citizenship, convictions in sham trials, and harsh punishments including death. Collectively, these measures erode international human rights and rule of law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 414-482

414State responsibility — International organizations — Attribution — Kosovo — United Nations Security Council — Security Council Resolution 1244 — Kosovo — United Nations Special Representative for Kosovo — North Atlantic Treaty Organization — Kosovo Force — Troop-contributing nations — United Kingdom — Ethnic tensions — Killings — Failure of Kosovo Force to investigate crimes — Whether conduct of Kosovo Force attributable to United Nations or to United KingdomJurisdiction — Territorial — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 1 — Exceptions to jurisdiction — Effective control — State agent authority — Kosovo Force — United Kingdom — Protection from violence — Police investigations — Whether United Kingdom exercising effective control of Kosovo at relevant time — Whether United Kingdom exercising physical authority or controlHuman rights — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 — Right to life — Article 3 — Right to be free from subjection to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment — Article 8 — Article 13 — Human Rights Act 1998 — Positive obligation — Whether United Kingdom having operational protective duty — Whether United Kingdom having investigative duty — Jurisdiction — Whether limitation period under Human Rights Act 1998 could be extended — Whether Human Rights Act 1998 can be applied retrospectively — Customary international lawState immunity — Security Council Resolution 1244 — Kosovo — Kosovo Force — United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo Regulation 2000/47 — Joint Declaration of Special Representative of Secretary General and Commander of Kosovo Force, 17 August 2000 — The law of England


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document