The diagnostic value of multi-detector CT angiography for catheter-related central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552095509
Author(s):  
Yuliang Zhao ◽  
Letian Yang ◽  
Yating Wang ◽  
Huawei Zhang ◽  
Tianlei Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Subclavian Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Stenosis

The objective is to compare Multi-detector CT angiography (MDCTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diagnosing hemodialysis catheter related-central venous stenosis (CVS). During a period of 6 years, hemodialysis patients with suspected catheter related-CVS who received both MDCTA and DSA were retrospectively enrolled. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) and other diagnostic parameters for MDCTA compared to DSA. A total of 1533 vascular segments in 219 patients were analyzed. Among the 280 lesions identified by DSA, 156 were correctly identified by MDCTA. There were 124 false negative and 41 false positive diagnoses. MDCTA had a high specificity (96.73%) but a low sensitivity (55.71%), with a moderate inter-test agreement (κ = 0.5930). In stratified analyses of vascular segments, the specificities of MDCTA were 89.93% (superior vena cava), 98.95% (left brachiocephalic vein), 95.33% (right brachiocephalic vein), 99.53% (left subclavian vein), 97.61% (right subclavian vein), 97.13% (left internal jugular vein), and 95.86% (right internal jugular vein), while the sensitivities were 90.00%, 65.52%, 66.67%, 87.50%, 40.00%, 20.00% and 8.11%, respectively. Good to excellent inter-test agreement was observed for the superior vena cava (κ = 0.7870), left brachiocephalic vein (κ = 0.7300), right brachiocephalic vein (κ = 0.6610), and left subclavian vein (κ = 0.8700) compared with poor to low agreement for the right subclavian vein (κ = 0.3950), left internal jugular vein (κ = 0.1890), and right internal jugular vein (κ = 0.0500). MDCTA had a high specificity in diagnosing hemodialysis catheter related-CVS. Its sensitivity varied by central venous segments, with better performance in superior vena cava and brachiocephalic veins.

scholarly journals Late Perforation of Superior Vena Cava and Effusion Caused by Central Venous Catheter

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Criado ◽  
A. Mena ◽  
R. Figueredo ◽  
E. Reig ◽  
F. Avello
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Left Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Central Venous

A patient developed right-side pleural effusion secondary to perforation of the superior vena cava by a catheter which had been inserted seven days previously through the left internal jugular vein.

scholarly journals Failure to place a tunneled hemodialysis catheter due to malformation of right internal jugular vein draining to subclavian vein

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 2481-2485
Author(s):  
Li-na Zhu ◽  
Li-jun Mou ◽  
Ying-Hu ◽  
Gui-na Wei ◽  
Jun-feng Sun
Keyword(s):  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Subclavian Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Stenosis ◽  
Inferior Segment ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
Computed Tomography Venography

The right internal jugular vein (IJV) is an important access site for hemodialysis catheterization. Venous cannulation failure is usually caused by central venous stenosis and is rarely related to vessel malformation. We herein present a case of failure to place a tunneled hemodialysis catheter into the right IJV. The patient had an arteriovenous fistula in the right arm with inadequate flow and a history of multiple central venous catheterizations. The guidewire was repeatedly misplaced into the right subclavian vein (SV) regardless of the technique used. Computed tomography venography revealed that the inferior segment of the right IJV drained into the ipsilateral SV. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of catheterization failure due to abnormal drainage of the right IJV into the ipsilateral SV.

Placement of Tunnelled Hemodialysis Catheters across Stenotic and Occluded Central Veins

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Falk ◽  
A. Alomari ◽  
J.E. Silberzweig
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with occluded or stenotic central veins. Materials and Methods Data were prospectively collected for 26 patients (11 male, 15 female, mean age 52 years) referred for placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters with central venous stenoses or occlusions. The central venous occlusions or stenoses were recanalized using traditional interventional catheter and guidewire techniques. Results Thirty central venous access procedures were performed of which 28 (93%) procedures resulted in successful tunneled catheter insertion. Twenty-one internal jugular venous (13 right, 8 left) and 7 subclavian venous (3 right, 4 left) catheters were placed. Eighteen stenotic and 10 occluded venous segments were crossed including the brachiocephalic vein (n = 22), subclavian vein (n = 2), and the superior vena cava (4). One patient required insertion of a metallic stent to facilitate passage of the hemodialysis catheter across an occluded brachiocephalic vein. No procedure-related complications occurred. No episodes of upper extremity swelling or superior vena cava syndrome occurred following catheter insertion. Conclusion Insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheter across occluded or stenotic central veins is technically feasible and safe. The use of occluded or stenotic central veins for catheter access preserves patent central veins for future shunt access.

Routine Chest Radiography Following Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: Use and Clinical Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouafak J. Homsi ◽  
Ibrahim M. Hashim ◽  
Caroline M. Hmedeh ◽  
Boutros Karam ◽  
Jamal J. Hoballah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Independent Reviewer

Highlights Abstract Background: A postoperative chest x-ray (CXR) remains part of some hospital protocols following tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement despite the use of operative imaging-guided techniques. The aim is to assess the usefulness of this practice and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource use. Methods: A review of medical records and postoperative CXR was done for 78 adult patients who had tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed in the operating room under fluoroscopy guidance. Catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture (51.3%) or exchanged from an existing catheter over a guide wire (48.7%). The postoperative CXRs were also examined by an independent reviewer to assess the catheter tip position and the need for repositioning to mimic a real-life postoperative setting. Procedural, nursing, and billing records were also reviewed. Results: No patients had a pneumothorax or major complications. On postoperative CXRs, 29 (37.2%) patients had the catheter tips in the right atrium, 23 (29.5%) in the cavoatrial junction, 25 (23.1%) in the superior vena cava, and 1 (1.3%) in the brachiocephalic vein. The independent reviewer found the catheter tips in acceptable anatomical positions in 75 of 78 patients. Only 3 (3.9%) patients had catheter malfunctions during dialysis and exchanged their catheters (2 had high catheters in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein, 1 had a kinked catheter). Postoperative CXRs also caused delays in patient discharge from postanesthesia care units and significant increases in medical expenses (around $199 per patient). Conclusion: Routine CXR after tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheter insertion is unnecessary and does not add to the procedure's safety or to the patient's outcome.

Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Pediatric Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Caruselli ◽  
Gianmarco Piattellini ◽  
Gianfranco Camilletti ◽  
Roberto Giretti ◽  
Raffaella Pagni
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Central Venous Catheterization ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena ◽  
Venous Catheterization

A persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a congenital anomaly of the systemic venous system. This anomaly is often discovered as an incidental result during central venous catheterization passing through the left subclavian or the left internal jugular vein. We report two cases of PLSVC in pediatric patients.

scholarly journals Aplasia of the superior vena cava and persistent superior left vena cava in a 3-year-old child: Case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Lazarev ◽  
Tatiana V. Linkova ◽  
Pavel M. Negoda ◽  
Anastasiya Yu. Shutkova ◽  
Sergey V. Gorelikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Vascular System ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Right

BACKGROUND: Structural features of the patients vascular system can cause unintended complications when providing vascular access and can disorient the specialist in assessing the location of the installed catheter. This study aimed to demonstrate anatomical features of the vascular system of the superior vena cava and diagnostic steps when providing vascular access in a child. CASE REPORT: Patient K (3 years old) was on planned maintenance of long-term venous access. Preliminary ultrasound examination of the superior vena cava did not reveal any abnormalities. Function of the right internal jugular vein under ultrasound control was performed without technical difficulties; a J-formed guidewire was inserted into the vessel lumen. X-ray control revealed its projection in the left heart, which was regarded as a technical complication, so the conductor was removed. A further attempt to insert a catheter through the right subclavian vein led to the same result. For a more accurate diagnosis, the child underwent computed angiography of the superior vena cava system. Congenital anomalies of the vascular system included aplasia of the superior vena cava and persistent left superior vena cava. Considering the information obtained, the Broviac catheter was implanted under ultrasound control through the left internal jugular vein without technical difficulties with the installation of the distal end of the catheter into the left brachiocephalic vein under X-ray control. CONCLUSION: A thorough multifaceted study of the vascular anatomy helps solve the anatomical issues by ensuring vascular access and preventing the risks of complications.

Cutdowns for Totally Implantable Access Ports to Central Veins

Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Kulaylat ◽  
Constantine P. Karakousis
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
External Jugular Vein ◽  
Cephalic Vein ◽  
Seldinger Technique ◽  
Basilic Vein

For insertion of totally implantable access ports, with the catheter end in the superior vena cava, the percutaneous (Seldinger) technique is commonly used. Of cutdowns, the cephalic vein cutdown is the most popular one (success rate about 80%), followed by the external jugular vein cutdown. Our preliminary experience suggests that internal jugular vein and basilic vein cutdowns have the anatomic features to prove both of them superior to the cephalic vein cutdown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document