cephalic vein
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

365
(FIVE YEARS 94)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5759
Author(s):  
Jarosław Janc ◽  
Marek Szamborski ◽  
Artur Milnerowicz ◽  
Lidia Łysenko ◽  
Patrycja Leśnik

The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port implantation may be a modified pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified PECS II for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland. A group of 114 patients underwent the modified PECS II block and additional cutaneous infiltration anesthesia at the incision line. Pain intensity was assessed on the NRS scale measured intraoperatively at four points. The QoR-15 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. The operator’s condition assessment score was used to assess surgical conditions and operator comfort. The analysis showed that the median pain intensity during vascular port implantation was 0. A statistically significant difference in pain intensity was demonstrated between the specialist’s group and the resident’s group at the second and third measurement points (p < 0.008; p < 0.012). The mean value on the QoR-15 scale was 132. There was a significant difference between the pain scores of the groups. The mean score in the pain position in the specialist’s group was 18 points and in the resident’s group, it was 19 points (p < 0.029). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the modified PECS II block is an effective and safe method of anesthesia for Port-A-Cath implantation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Taleski ◽  
Svetlana Stankovik ◽  
Dejan Risteski ◽  
Filip Janusevski ◽  
Bekim Pocesta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Minimally invasive and safe central venous access is imperative for lead insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The purpose of this trial was to explore and compare the usability of the cephalic vein (CV) between both sexes. Methods and results This single-center prospective study included 102 consecutive patients in a period of six months. Pre-procedural contrast-enhanced venographic images of the upper arm were performed in all included patients. Our attention was focused on comparing several morpho-anatomical CV characteristics such as venous diameter, presence of valves and angle of entrance of the CV into the subclavian vein (SV). Study results concerning the CV morpho-anatomical differences were more favorable regarding the female patient group, with significant differences in CV diameter (p-0.030). There was also a difference in favor of the female group regarding the favorable CV angle of entrance into the SV, found in the 61.7% versus 54.4% in the male patient group. The comparison of usability of the CV and CVC technique was explored by comparing the number of leads inserted through the CV in both sexes. Two leads were implanted in 11.7% in the female group versus 5.8% in the male group, and 0 leads through the CV in 38.2% of the female patients versus 50% of male group. Conclusion Female patients have more favorable cephalic vein morpho-anatomical futures and better usability for lead placement than male patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110573
Author(s):  
Mary Hammes ◽  
Sanjay Desai ◽  
John F Lucas ◽  
Nivedita Mitta ◽  
Abhishek Pulla ◽  
...  

Background: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation and maturation for hemodialysis is globally a topic of importance given the poor results and high costs associated with renal care. Successful AVF (surgical or endovascular) creation requires appropriate superficial veins and quality arteries. Many procedures fail due to initial small veins with limited blood flow capacity and distensibility. Intermittent pneumatic compression has previously shown success in trials to increase superficial veins in patients with end stage renal disease post AVF. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of an intermittent pneumatic device, the Fist Assist®, to dilate cephalic arm veins in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) prior to AVF placement. Methods: Three centers enrolled subjects from June 2019 through July 2021. Baseline Doppler measurements of the cephalic vein in standard locations the forearm and upper arm with and without a blood pressure cuff were recorded. Patients were instructed and used Fist Assist® on their non-dominant arm for up to 4 h daily for 90 days. At approximately 3 months, Doppler measurements were repeated. The primary endpoint was cephalic vein enlargement with secondary endpoints based on percentage of veins approaching 2.5 mm in the forearm and 3.5 mm in the upper arm. Results: Thirty-seven subjects with CKD (mean eGFR 13.8 mL/min) were enrolled and completed the trial. Paired-difference t-tests (one tail) for aggregate data showed significant venous dilation of the cephalic vein in both the forearm and upper arm after use with the Fist Assist® ( p < 0.05). Mean differences in the forearm veins were approximately 0.6 and 1.1 mm in the upper arm cephalic vein after Fist Assist® application. There were no major complications reported by any subject during the trial. Conclusions: Fist Assist® use in patients with CKD is effective to enhance vein dilation. Forearm and upper arm cephalic veins increased on average 0.6 and 1.1 mm respectively after Fist Assist® application. This is the first trial to evaluate the effect of intermittent, focal pneumatic compression on pre-surgery vein diameter in patients with advanced CKD before AVF creation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fernandes de Souza Garcia ◽  
Gesiane Ribeiro ◽  
Julia de Assis Arantes ◽  
Gustavo Morandini Reginato ◽  
Nathalia Villaca Xavier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background For horses requiring prolonged daily cephalic intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP), the use of a totally implantable catheter (TIC) could be indicated to reduce complications associated with frequent venipuncture or external catheterization. This study aims to evaluate the implantation technique of the TIC in the cephalic vein of horses for IVRLP, describe the complications associated with the device’s placement and use, and assess its viability up to 60 days after implantation. Totally implantable catheters, cut to 15 cm (n = 5) and 46 cm (n = 5) in length, were implanted into one cephalic vein in ten adult horses (n = 10). Twenty-four hours following placement, IVRLP with contrast was performed via the TIC and evaluated with radiography. Physical examinations, lameness evaluation, hematologic assessment, and the catheter patency tests were performed at scheduled intervals for the duration of catheterization (7–60 days). Results Catheters were implanted without difficulty and allowed for IVRLP 24 h post implantation. Complications resulted in removal of the catheters, with four maintained for 7 days, three in place for 15 days, and three catheters maintained for 60 days. Complications included lameness, limb swelling, catheter kinking, and venous thrombosis. Conclusions The implantation technique of the TIC in the cephalic vein of horses is feasible and requires minimal technical effort. Although TIC allows venous access without the need for repeated venipuncture, its long-term use presents complications. For horses requiring prolonged daily cephalic IVRLP, the use of a TIC could be indicated. However, the high incidence of venous thrombosis may limit clinical application.


Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Masood ◽  
Muhammad Jamil Malik ◽  
Muhammad Irfan Khan

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Vigneswaran ◽  
R Clancy ◽  
S Choo ◽  
S Love-Jones ◽  
P Jackson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Free flap surgery has inherent risks, and the venous drainage of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is particularly vulnerable to congestion. In these cases, an algorithm for flap salvage should be followed and one of the final steps in this process is a cephalic vein transposition. Case Report We describe two patients undergoing mastectomy and immediate bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction, where cephalic vein transposition was required. As part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, patients are anaesthetised with a continuous propofol infusion (Total Intravenous Anaesthesia; TIVA). When the cephalic vein was identified, the propofol infusion was visible within the vein, which would have interrupted TIVA if harvested. To maintain continuous TIVA infusion, the cannula was resited prior to harvest of the cephalic vein. The cephalic vein was anastomosed to the superficial inferior epigastric vein and resolution of the venous congestion was noted. Conclusions These cases although rare highlight the importance of robust preoperative planning and communication between the team and preparation for all eventualities to ensure patient safety and successful outcomes. These cases highlight the potential effects vein harvesting or transposition may have on the safe and effective delivery of anaesthetic agents and other medication. We hope these cases prompt a discussion in the preoperative stage for alternate strategies for monitoring and intravenous access in response to diversions from the standard operating procedure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110396
Author(s):  
Hyein Kim ◽  
Peter R Nelson ◽  
Nasir Mushtaq ◽  
Alexandros Mallios ◽  
Kelly Kempe ◽  
...  

Background: Establishing a forearm arteriovenous fistula (AVF) offers preferred cannulation sites and preserves proximal access opportunities. When a radiocephalic AVF at the wrist is not feasible and the upper arm cephalic and median cubital veins are inadequate, an AV graft or more complex access procedure is often required. Creating a retrograde flow forearm AVF (RF-AVF) is a valuable alternative where the mid-forearm median antebrachial or cephalic vein is adequate, offering forearm cannulation zones with AVF outflow through deep and superficial collaterals. We report our technique and results. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our vascular access data base of consecutive patients during an 11-year study period where a RF-AVF established the only available cannulation target in the forearm. In addition to physical examination, all patients had ultrasound vessel mapping. Results: A forearm access was established with a RF-AVF as the only opportunity for cannulation in 48 patients. Ages were 14–86 years (median = 62 years). Forty-four percent female, 63% diabetic, 13% obese, and 29% had previous access operations. Inflow was proximal radial artery in 47 individuals and one proximal ulnar. Nine AVFs (19%) failed at 2–66 months (median 14 months). One RF-AVF was ligated due to arm edema. Follow-up was 2–111 months (median = 23.5 months). Primary and cumulative patency rates were 62% and 91% at 12 months, and 46% and 85% at 24 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up with functioning RF-AVFs (mean 41 months). Twenty-three patients (48%) died during F/U of causes unrelated to access procedures (mean 25 months). Conclusions: Establishing a reverse flow forearm AVF offers a successful autogenous access option in the forearm for selected patients with an inadequate distal radial artery and/or cephalic vein at the wrist, avoiding more complex or staged procedures and preserving upper arm sites for future use. A proximal radial artery inflow procedure is recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Ibrahima Niang ◽  
Pape Matar Kandji ◽  
Waly Niang Mboup ◽  
Hamza Souhail ◽  
Mamadou Ly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erina Leask

PICO question In adult cats undergoing a venepuncture procedure, does the application of a topical lidocaine based anaesthetic to the skin at the venepuncture site reduce the severity of signs associated with pain when compared to no topical anaesthetic?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Four papers were critically reviewed. Three were prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trials, and one was a prospective, double-blind, controlled experimental trial Strength of evidence Moderate Outcomes reported The application of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anaesthetics (EMLA™) cream to clipped skin over the procedure site, a minimum of 30 minutes prior to the venepuncture procedure, significantly reduced the severity of pain-associated behaviours during jugular phlebotomy in healthy, conscious feline patients when compared to a placebo1,2. In felines sedated with dexmedetomidine and either methadone or nalbuphine, the administration of EMLA™ cream to clipped skin for 20 minutes significantly decreased the severity of pain responses during intravenous (IV) cephalic vein catheterisation when compared to no treatment3. In clinically unwell feline patients, the use of EMLA™ cream on clipped skin at the site of jugular catheterisation 60 minutes prior demonstrated reduced pain responses compared to a placebo, but further investigation with a larger sample size is required to verify statistical significance4 Conclusion The available evidence moderately supports the hypothesis that EMLA™ cream is an effective and noninvasive treatment for providing enhanced pain-relief during jugular and cephalic vein phlebotomy for the purposes of blood collection and catheterisation, respectively. The areas for treatment should be clipped free of hair, and the cream applied for a minimum of 30 minutes in non-sedated cats and 20 minutes in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and either methadone or nalbuphine. Moreover, when applied to normal, intact skin and covered by an occlusive bandage to avoid ingestion, it is well supported by supplementary evidence that EMLA™ cream has a wide safety margin for topical use in cats4,5   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document