The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1024-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Cabanas-Valdés ◽  
Caritat Bagur-Calafat ◽  
Montserrat Girabent-Farrés ◽  
Fernanda Mª Caballero-Gómez ◽  
Montserrat Hernández-Valiño ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rosa Cabanas-Valdés ◽  
Lídia Boix-Sala ◽  
Montserrat Grau-Pellicer ◽  
Juan Antonio Guzmán-Bernal ◽  
Fernanda Maria Caballero-Gómez ◽  
...  

Background: Trunk impairment produces disorders of motor control, balance and gait. Core stability exercises (CSE) are a good strategy to improve local strength of trunk, balance and gait. Methods and analysis: This is a single-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial. Two parallel groups are compared, and both perform the same type of therapy. A control group (CG) (n = 110) performs conventional physiotherapy (CP) (1 h per session) focused on improving balance. An experimental group (EG) (n = 110) performs CSE (30 min) in addition to CP (30 min) (1 h/session in total). EG is divided in two subgroups, in which only half of patients (n = 55) perform CSE plus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Primary outcome measures are dynamic sitting, assessed by a Spanish version of Trunk Impairment Scale and stepping, assessed by Brunel Balance Assessment. Secondary outcomes are postural control, assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients; standing balance and risk of fall assessed by Berg Balance Scale; gait speed by BTS G-Walk (accelerometer); rate of falls, lower-limb spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale; activities of daily living by Barthel Index; and quality of life by EQ-5D-5L. These are evaluated at baseline (T0), at three weeks (T1), at five weeks (end of the intervention) (T2), at 17 weeks (T3) and at 29 weeks (T4). Study duration per patient is 29 weeks (a five-week intervention, followed by a 24-week post-intervention).


PM&R ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. S99-S99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeev Meiner ◽  
Iris Fisher ◽  
Michal Katz-Leurer ◽  
Martin Neeb ◽  
Anna Sajin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Cabanas-Valdés ◽  
Lidia Boix-Sala ◽  
Montserrat Grau-Pellicer ◽  
Juan Antonio Guzmán-Bernal ◽  
Fernanda Maria Caballero-Gómez ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundTrunk impairment produces disorders of motor control, balance, and gait that are correlated with increased risk of falls and reduced mobility in stroke survivors. This creates disability and dependency to perform their activities of daily living. Alterations in body alignment occur, requiring treatment strategies focused on improving the postural control. bearing. Core stability exercises (CSE) are a good strategy to improve local strength of trunk, dynamic sitting, standing balance, and gait. There is some evidence about its effectiveness but it is still necessary to run a large multicenter trial to ratify that existing evidence.MethodsThis is a single-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial. Two parallel groups are compared and both perform the same type of therapy. A control group (CG) (n=110) performs conventional physiotherapy (CP) (1 hour per session) focused on improving balance. An experimental group (EG) (n=110) performs CSE (30 minutes) in addition to CP (30 minutes) (1 hour/session in total). EG is divided in two subgroups, in which only half of patients (n=55) perform CSE plus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Primary outcome measures are dynamic sitting, assessed by Spanish-version of Trunk Impairment Scale and stepping, assessed by Brunel Balance Assessment. Secondary outcomes are postural control, assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients; standing balance and risk of fall assessed by Berg Balance Scale; gait speed by BTS G-Walk (accelerometer); rate of falls, lower-limb spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale; activities of daily living by Barthel Index; and quality of life by EQ-5D-5L. These are evaluated at baseline (T0), at 3 weeks (T1), at 5 weeks -at the end of the intervention (T2), at 17 weeks (T3) and at 29 weeks (T4). Study duration per patient is 29 weeks (a 5-week intervention, followed by a 24-week post-intervention). DiscussionThe study will provide useful information on the short and long term effects of a physiotherapy rehabilitation program based on core stability exercises performed in subacute phase.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03975985. Data registration June 5th, 2019. Retrospectively registered. Date of registration in primary registry: June 5, 2019. Protocol version 1


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. e13-e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Orihuela-Espina ◽  
Giovana Femat Roldán ◽  
Israel Sánchez Villavicencio ◽  
Lorena Palafox ◽  
Ronald Leder ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Orihuela-Espina ◽  
Giovana Femat Roldán ◽  
Israel Sánchez-Villavicencio ◽  
Lorena Palafox ◽  
Ronald Leder ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Songhua Huang ◽  
Peile Liu ◽  
Yinglun Chen ◽  
Beiyao Gao ◽  
Yingying Li ◽  
...  

Purpose. To compare the effectiveness of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) versus neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on motor recovery of the upper limb in subacute stroke patients. Materials and Methods. Fifty patients within six months poststroke were randomly assigned to the CCFES group ( n = 25 ) and the NMES group ( n = 25 ). Both groups underwent routine rehabilitation plus 20-minute stimulation on wrist extensors per day, five days a week, for 3 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE), action research arm test (ARAT), Barthel Index (BI), and surface electromyography (sEMG) were assessed at baseline and end of intervention. Results. After a 3-week intervention, FMA-UE and BI increased in both groups ( p < 0.05 ). ARAT increased significantly only in the CCFES group ( p < 0.05 ). The changes of FMA-UE, ARAT, and BI in the CCFES group were not greater than those in the NMES group. The improvement in sEMG response of extensor carpi radialis by CCFES was greater than that by NMES ( p = 0.026 ). The cocontraction ratio (CCR) of flexor carpi radialis did not decrease in both groups. Conclusions. CCFES improved upper limb motor function, but did not show better treatment effect than NMES. CCFES significantly enhanced the sEMG response of paretic extensor carpi radialis compared with NMES, but did not decrease the cocontraction of antagonist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document