Acute and subacute prostate MRI findings after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512097693
Author(s):  
Pietari Mäkelä ◽  
Mikael Anttinen ◽  
Visa Suomi ◽  
Aida Steiner ◽  
Jani Saunavaara ◽  
...  

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) is an emerging method for treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). TULSA-related subacute MRI findings have not been previously characterized. Purpose To evaluate acute and subacute MRI findings after TULSA treatment in a treat-and-resect setting. Material and Methods Six men with newly diagnosed MRI-visible and biopsy-concordant clinically significant PCa were enrolled and completed the study. Eight lesions classified as PI-RADS 3–5 were focally ablated using TULSA. One- and three-week follow-up MRI scans were performed between TULSA and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Results TULSA-related hemorrhage was detected as a subtle T1 hyperintensity and more apparent T2 hypointensity in the MRI. Both prostate volume and non-perfused volume (NPV) markedly increased after TULSA at one week and three weeks after treatment, respectively. Lesion apparent diffusion coefficient values increased one week after treatment and decreased nearing the baseline values at the three-week MRI follow-up. Conclusion The optimal timing of MRI follow-up seems to be at the earliest at three weeks after treatment, when the post-procedural edema has decreased and the NPV has matured. Diffusion-weighted imaging has little or no added diagnostic value in the subacute setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Klotz ◽  
Christian P. Pavlovich ◽  
Joseph Chin ◽  
Gencay Hatiboglu ◽  
Michael Koch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gencay Hatiboglu ◽  
Valentin Popeneciu ◽  
David Bonekamp ◽  
Mathieu Burtnyk ◽  
Robert Staruch ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo assess differences in 24-month oncologic and functional outcomes in men with low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) using intentionally conservative versus intensified treatment parameters.Patients and MethodsPatients from a single center involved in two multicenter trials were included in this analysis. This included 14 of 30 patients with Gleason 3 + 3 from a Phase I study using intentionally conservative treatment parameters, and 15 of 115 patients with Gleason ≤ 3 + 4 from a pivotal study using intensified parameters. Follow-up data compared across these cohorts included 12-month biopsy and MRI for all patients, and 24-month PSA, micturition and quality of life (IIEF, IPSS, IPSS-QOL). The prognostic value of baseline parameters and PSA kinetics on 12-month histological recurrence was evaluated by logistic regression.Results12-month biopsy revealed clinically significant residual disease in 4 (29%) and 2 (14%) patients from the Phase I and pivotal studies, respectively. PSA nadir was 0.7 ng/ml for Phase I and 0.5 ng/ml for pivotal study patients. Patient age at diagnosis, use of MRI fusion/systematic prostate biopsy, number of obtained cores at initial biopsy, PSA course, and PSA nadir were identified as prognostic factors for treatment success. All but one patient from each cohort maintained erection firmness sufficient for penetration. No cases of pad use were reported at 24 months. There were no Grade 4 or higher adverse events, and no late toxicity related to the procedure.ConclusionTwo-year follow-up demonstrated the efficacy of TULSA for the treatment of localized prostate cancer, and the durability of PSA and functional outcomes. Intensifying treatment parameters in the pivotal trial had no impact on safety or functional outcomes through 24 months, while reducing the recurrence rate for clinically significant disease. Careful patient selection by MRI fusion/systematic prostate biopsy and adequate follow-up through routine 12-month biopsy are recommended.


2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Eggener* ◽  
David Penson ◽  
Christian Pavlovich ◽  
Joseph Chin ◽  
Steven S. Raman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document