Endocrine and Clinical Effects of an Lhrh Analogue in Pretreated Advanced Breast Cancer

1988 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Lissoni ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Sergio Crispino ◽  
Giulio Cattaneo ◽  
Gabriele Tancini

Buserelin represents one of the main LHRH analogues. It appears to be effective in untreated metastatic breast cancer, whereas its activity in pretreated advanced patients remains to be established. To evaluate endocrine and clinical effects of buserelin in pretreated advanced mammary carcinoma, 14 postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, which had been previously treated with hormones and/or chemotherapy, entered the study. Buserelin was subcutaneously injected at a daily dose of 1.5 mg for 7 days, then intranasally at a daily dose of 1.2 mg until progression. Before and after the 7 days of subcutaneous administration of the LHRH analogue, FSH, LH, estradiol, testosterone basal serum levels, and PRL response to TRH were examined. After the 7 days of buserelin subcutaneous injection, a significant decrease in FSH, LH and estradiol values was observed, whereas testosterone was not affected. PRL response to TRH did not change after buserelin subcutaneous treatment in 8 patients, it decreased in one and was completely abolished in the last 5 cases. All patients whose PRL response to TRH did not decrease had a progression within the first month of therapy, whereas only 1 of 6 patients whose PRL response to TRH was reduced or abolished following buserelin administration showed a progression. Among the other 5 cases, 2 minor responses and 3 stable diseases were achieved. These preliminary results suggest that buserelin has only a limited effectiveness in metastatic breast cancer patients who have been previously treated with hormones and/or chemotherapy, and that its activity in the control of tumor growth is associated with a reduction in PRL secretion.

2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Poletti ◽  
Anna Cecilia Bettini ◽  
Elena Rota Caremoli ◽  
Roberto Labianca ◽  
Carlo Tondini

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13017-13017
Author(s):  
T. Saeki ◽  
A. Okita ◽  
K. Aogi ◽  
T. Kakishita ◽  
R. Okita ◽  
...  

13017 Background: The mechanism of paclitaxel (PXL) resistance has been investigated. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on cell membrane could be an important target for improving efficacy of PXL. Toremifene (TOR) may moderate P-gp-related drug resistance in vitro. To determine safety and efficacy of PXL and TOR, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study for a combination chemo-endocrine treatment of PXL plus TOR for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer, who were previously treated with a standard chemotherapy without PXL, were eligible. Patients received PXL 80 mg/m2(i.v.) weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in a cycle. Concurrently, toremifene 120mg/body (p.o.) was given dairy from day 1–28 in a cycle. For pharmacokinetic study, single agent of PXL was initially administrated on day 1, 8, and 15. From day 18, TOR 120mg/body was given dairy. On day 22, PXL administration in second cycle was skipped. On day 32, blood samples were collected from the patients received PXL 80 mg/m2 + TOR 120 mg/day/body. Samples were analyzed by HPLC (Unisil Q 5CN). Response was evaluated by WHO criteria and adverse events were evaluated by NCI•CTC Ver.2. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Out of 19, 15 patients had measurable disease, and 1 partial response, 8 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease were observed. The addition of TOR caused in no specific adverse events more than grade 3 and toxic profile in combination was similar that in PXL monotherapy. Pharmacokinetic profile of PXL was similar with/without TOR. In addition, Cmax of TOR was 1.85±0.71 mg/mL. Tmax was 2.9±1.8 hr were observed. AUC0–8 of TOR was not affected in the presence of PXL. AUC0- 8 of TOR-1, metabolite of TOR, also demonstrated the similar pharmacokinetic profile. Pharmacokinetic parameters of PXL did not reveal intra-patient variability in previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic profile in a combination of PXL and TOR was similar that in PXL monotherapy. The addition of TOR to PXL for previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients might be safety. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document