scholarly journals Ethics and Issues of Secondary Prevention Efforts in Child Sexual Abuse

Author(s):  
Kieran F. McCartan ◽  
Hannah L. Merdian ◽  
Derek E. Perkins ◽  
Danielle Kettleborough

This article discusses the ethical, practical, and moral issues surrounding secondary prevention efforts of child sexual abuse from a professional and practice-based perspective. Transcripts of a semistructured consultation event with n = 15 international experts on the secondary prevention of child sexual abuse were analysed using thematic qualitative analysis. The research identified four main critical areas linked to secondary prevention efforts, including, the psychology of self-reporting and disclosure; the interaction with and within existing legal, social, and professional frameworks; the scale and type of an appropriate response; and potential hurdles (i.e., within media, public, politics). The article outlines these areas, highlighting participant perspectives on risk-enhancing and mitigating factors for each domain.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 264-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
AINSLIE HEASMAN ◽  
THOMAS FOREMAN

Abstract:Child sexual abuse is a global problem with significant emotional, psychological, and financial implications to victims, perpetrators, and society. Most child sexual abuse prevention programs target young children or those who have already engaged in abusive behavior, in order to prevent further offending. There are numerous secondary prevention programs targeting individuals at-risk of various health conditions in an effort to reduce the likelihood they will go on to experience a particular illness or disease. Considerable research exists regarding the risk factors for engaging in child sexual abuse and more specifically the factors contributing to reoffense. We argue that engaging in secondary prevention programs for people with pedophilia, in order to prevent child sexual abuse, is an ethically responsible and necessary practice. Secondary prevention programs with this focus are reviewed, along with the implications of mandatory reporting in doing this work.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Knack ◽  
Belinda Winder ◽  
Lisa Murphy ◽  
J. Paul Fedoroff

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 202 ◽  
Author(s):  
VyjayanthiKanugodu Srinivasa Subramaniyan ◽  
Praveen Reddy ◽  
Girish Chandra ◽  
Chandrika Rao ◽  
TS. Sathyanarayana Rao

Author(s):  
Roxanne Guyon ◽  
Mylène Fernet ◽  
Éliane Dussault ◽  
Amélie Gauthier-Duchesne ◽  
Marie-Marthe Cousineau ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Megan Cleary

In recent years, the law in the area of recovered memories in child sexual abuse cases has developed rapidly. See J.K. Murray, “Repression, Memory & Suggestibility: A Call for Limitations on the Admissibility of Repressed Memory Testimony in Abuse Trials,” University of Colorado Law Review, 66 (1995): 477-522, at 479. Three cases have defined the scope of liability to third parties. The cases, decided within six months of each other, all involved lawsuits by third parties against therapists, based on treatment in which the patients recovered memories of sexual abuse. The New Hampshire Supreme Court, in Hungerford v. Jones, 722 A.2d 478 (N.H. 1998), allowed such a claim to survive, while the supreme courts in Iowa, in J.A.H. v. Wadle & Associates, 589 N.W.2d 256 (Iowa 1999), and California, in Eear v. Sills, 82 Cal. Rptr. 281 (1991), rejected lawsuits brought by nonpatients for professional liability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document