scholarly journals International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP)

Cephalalgia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-221 ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Paulo Cesar Rodrigues Conti ◽  
Juliana Stuginski Barbosa ◽  
Leonardo R Bonjardim ◽  
Daniela Aparecida de Godoi Gonçalves

Editorial


Author(s):  
Maria Pigg ◽  
Donald R. Nixdorf ◽  
Alan S. Law ◽  
Tara Renton ◽  
Yair Sharav ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (35) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
N. V. Latysheva ◽  
E. G. Filatova ◽  
Al. B. Danilov ◽  
R. R. Parsamyan ◽  
E. A. Salina

The diagnosis and treatment of orofacial pain is in many cases a complex task due to difficulties in history taking, multi‑faceted pathology, psychiatric comorbidities and psychosocial factors involved in such pain. Neurologists tend to overdiagnose trigeminal neuralgia. However, other types of neuropathiс orofacial pain are also common. Moreover, neurologists are often unfamiliar with the temporomandibular disorder and tend to neglect this extremely prevalent cause of orofacial pain. Correct understanding of the causes of orofacial pain is vital not only for treatment selection, but also to minimize the risk of adverse events associated with unnecessary madications. Moreover, untreated orofacial pain often becomes chronic and treatment resistant. Many patients in this case would require physical therapy, pharmacological treatments, cognitive behavioral therapy and other support options. The aim of this paper is to review the new International classification of orofacial pain as well as the prevalence, pathophysiology and treatment of the temporomandibular disorder, trigeminal neuralgia, persistent idiopathic facial pain, burning mouth syndrome and other forms of orofacial pain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 251581632096278
Author(s):  
Noboru Imai ◽  
Asami Moriya ◽  
Eiji Kitamura

The International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) classifies orofacial pain resembling primary headache as orofacial migraine and tension-type, trigeminal autonomic, and neurovascular orofacial pain. We used the ICOP classification style to make a diagnosis on a 76-year-old woman with orofacial pain, which developed only during sleep three times per week, caused awakening, and lasted 3–4 h without cranial autonomic symptoms or restlessness. Except for the pain area, her symptoms fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for hypnic headache. We diagnosed her with orofacial pain resembling hypnic headache. We should review the cases of such patients and classify them according to the ICOP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 83/116 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-607
Author(s):  
Pavel Řehulka ◽  
Julie Bartáková ◽  
Markéta Hudečková ◽  
Tomáš Filipovský ◽  
Rudolf Kotas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel Chavarría-Bolanos ◽  
Amaury Pozos-Guillén ◽  
Mauricio Montero-Aguilar

In 2020, two important changes were adapted by the international health community: a new definition of pain and a new classification for orofacial pain conditions. With these changes new tasks and challenges also emerged, and clinicians from several disciplines begun to adopt and reconsidered classic paradigms, and the policies derived from them. This new perspective article, examine the new definition of pain proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain, and the new International Classification of Orofacial Pain; analyzing the positive impact and further perspectives of these.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Souichirou TADOKORO ◽  
Noboru NOMA ◽  
Daiki TAKANEZAWA ◽  
Kana OZASA ◽  
Akiko OKADA ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-938
Author(s):  
Anna Cronin ◽  
Sharynne McLeod ◽  
Sarah Verdon

Purpose Children with a cleft palate (± cleft lip; CP±L) can have difficulties communicating and participating in daily life, yet speech-language pathologists typically focus on speech production during routine assessments. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY; World Health Organization, 2007 ) provides a framework for holistic assessment. This tutorial describes holistic assessment of children with CP±L illustrated by data collected from a nonclinical sample of seven 2- to 3-year-old children, 13 parents, and 12 significant others (e.g., educators and grandparents). Method Data were collected during visits to participants' homes and early childhood education and care centers. Assessment tools applicable to domains of the ICF-CY were used to collect and analyze data. Child participants' Body Functions including speech, language, and cognitive development were assessed using screening and standardized assessments. Participants' Body Structures were assessed via oral motor examination, case history questionnaires, and observation. Participants' Activities and Participation as well as Environmental and Personal Factors were examined through case history questionnaires, interviews with significant others, parent report measures, and observations. Results Valuable insights can be gained from undertaking holistic speech-language pathology assessments with children with CP±L. Using multiple tools allowed for triangulation of data and privileging different viewpoints, to better understand the children and their contexts. Several children demonstrated speech error patterns outside of what are considered cleft speech characteristics, which underscores the importance of a broader assessment. Conclusion Speech-language pathologists can consider incorporating evaluation of all components and contextual factors of the ICF-CY when assessing and working with young children with CP±L to inform intervention and management practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document