Surgical Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Pereira ◽  
Ronald S. Kvitne ◽  
Michael Liang ◽  
Frank B. Giacobetti ◽  
Edward Ebramzadeh

Background Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon has most commonly been repaired by anatomic reattachment of the tendon to the radial tuberosity by a single- or two-incision approach. Researchers have studied suture anchor attachment through a single incision, but the tendon-suture interface and bone quality have not previously been analyzed. Hypothesis Suture anchor repair results in stiffness and tensile strength equal to that of bone-tunnel repair for biceps tendon rupture. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Twelve matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were used. Suture anchor and bone-tunnel tendon repairs were performed in a randomized fashion. Each specimen was loaded to tensile failure. Load-displacement graphs were generated to calculate repair stiffness, yield strength, and ultimate strength. Computed tomography bone density measurements and additional statistical analyses were then performed after grouping the specimens by mode of failure. Results The bone-tunnel repair was found to be significantly stiffer in all cases and to have significantly greater tensile strength than the suture anchor repair in the younger, nonosteoporotic elbows. Conclusions Suture anchor repairs were not as stiff or strong as bone-tunnel repairs. Clinical Relevance Biceps tendon surgery using the traditional two-incision technique yields a stronger and stiffer repair in the typical patient with this injury.

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Dupaix ◽  
Megan H.M. Kuba ◽  
Robert E. Atkinson ◽  
Daniel I. Singer ◽  
Megan M. Chock ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199181
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kapicioglu ◽  
Emre Bilgin ◽  
Necip Guven ◽  
Anil Pulatkan ◽  
Kerem Bilsel

Background: The classic injury mechanism of a distal biceps brachii tendon rupture (DBBTR) is eccentric loading to the flexed elbow when the forearm is supinated. Purpose: To determine alternative mechanisms of a DBBTR in powerlifting sports, particularly in deadlift competitions, with the use of YouTube videos. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A search on YouTube was performed using the search terms “distal biceps tendon rupture” and “distal biceps tendon injury” combined with “competition,” “deadlift,” and “powerlifting.” The videos underwent an evaluation for accuracy by 3 surgeons according to predetermined criteria. Type of sports activity, participant sex, side of the injury, and arm positions at the time of the injury were recorded. Results: Among the videos reviewed, 35 injuries were found appropriate for an evaluation. All participants were male. The majority of the injuries (n = 25) were observed during the deadlift. Only in 1 deadlift injury were both forearms in supination. In the remaining deadlift injuries (n = 24), all elbows were in extension, with 1 forearm in supination and the other in pronation. Among the deadlift injuries in the mixed-grip position, all ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity: 25% (n = 6) of ruptures occurred on the right side, and 75% (n = 18) of ruptures occurred on the left side; this was a significant difference ( P = .014). Conclusion: We described an alternative mechanism for a DBBTR, namely, eccentric loading to an extended elbow when the forearm is supinated during the deadlift. As all the ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity, holding the bar with both forearms in pronation may prevent or decrease the risk of ruptures during the deadlift.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document