Higher Rate of Return to Preinjury Activity Levels After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in High-Activity Patients: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110441
Author(s):  
Richard Rahardja ◽  
Hamish Love ◽  
Mark G. Clatworthy ◽  
Andrew Paul Monk ◽  
Simon W. Young
Keyword(s):  
High Activity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Tendon Autograft ◽  
Return To Activity

Background: In primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft is associated with lower ipsilateral failure rates. BTB autografts are associated with a higher rate of contralateral ACL injuries, which some clinicians view as a marker of success of the BTB autograft. However, there is a lack of evidence on whether BTB autografts improve the rate of return to activity and sport. Purpose: To compare the rate of return to preinjury activity levels in high-activity patients after ACL reconstruction with BTB autograft or hamstring tendon autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In a high-activity cohort of patients recorded between 2014 and 2018 in the New Zealand ACL Registry, prospectively collected data on preinjury and postoperative Marx activity scores were analyzed. The proportion of patients who returned to their preinjury activity levels at 1- and 2-year follow-up was compared between graft types. Results: Overall, 11.3% (208/1844) of patients returned to their preinjury activity levels at 1-year follow-up, and 15.5% (184/1190) returned at 2-year follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, 17.2% of patients with a BTB autograft returned to their preinjury activity levels compared with 9.3% of patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.16-2.17]; P = .004). At 2-year follow-up, 23.3% of patients with a BTB autograft had returned to their preinjury activity levels compared with 13.3% of patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.14-2.34]; P = .008). Male sex and younger age were associated with a higher rate of return to activity at both follow-up time points. Conclusion: The use of BTB autografts increased the odds of returning to preinjury activity levels at early follow-up. A higher rate of return to activity is a possible explanation for the higher rate of contralateral ACL injuries with the use of BTB autografts.

scholarly journals Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes, Survivorship, and Return to Sports after Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction for Sternoclavicular Joint Instability

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0033
Author(s):  
Lucca Lacheta ◽  
Brandon Goldenberg ◽  
Marilee Horan ◽  
Sam Rosenberg ◽  
Jonas Pogorzelski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Joint Instability ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Joint Reconstruction ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Objectives: Instability of the sternoclavicular (SC) joint is a rare but potentially devastating pathology, particularly when it occurs in young or active patients, where it can lead to persistent pain and impairment of shoulder function. SC reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft is a commonly used treatment option, but mid-term results are still lacking. To assess clinical outcomes, survivorship, and return to sports rate after SC joint reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft in patients suffering from SC joint instability. We hypothesized that SC joint reconstruction would result in good clinical outcomes, a high survivorship, and a high rate of return to sports. Methods: All patients who underwent SC joint reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft for SC joint instability, with a minimum 5-year follow up, were included. Patient reported outcomes were assessed prospectively by the use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, General heath physical component of the SF-12 (PCS) and patient satisfaction. Survivorship of reconstruction was defined as no further SC joint dislocation events or revision surgery. Return to sports and pain were assessed using a customized questionnaire. Results: 22 SC joint reconstructions with a mean age of 31.3 (range 15.8 - 57.0 years) at the time of surgery were included. At final evaluation, 18 SC joint reconstructions with a mean follow up of 6.0 years (range 5.0 – 7.3 years) were eligible for minimum 5-year follow-up. All clinical outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively, ASES (50.0 to 91.0; p = .005), SANE (45.9 to 86.0; p = .007), QuickDASH (44.2 to 12.1; p = .003), and PCS (39.4 to 50.9; p = .001). Median postoperative satisfaction was 9 (range 7 - 10). The construct survivorship was 90% at 5-year follow-up. Two patients failed at 82 and 336 days postoperatively and were revised with revision SC joint reconstruction and capsulorrhaphy. Another patient had a superficial wound infection, which was debrided once, and resulted in a good clinical outcome. Of the patients who answered optional sports activity questionnaires, 17 (77%) shoulders participated in recreational or professional sports before injury. At final follow-up, 16/17 (94%) shoulders returned to their pre-injury level of sport or better. The VAS score for pain today (p = 0.004) and pain at its worst (p = 0.004) improved significantly pre- to postoperatively. Conclusions: SC joint reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft for SC joint instability resulted in significantly improved clinical outcomes with high patient satisfaction and 90% survivorship at mid-term follow up. Furthermore, a reliable rate of return to previous level of sports was observed in this young and high-demanding patient population. Concerns in terms of advanced post-instability arthritis were not confirmed since a significant decrease in pain was found after minimum 5-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Evaluating the results of an all-inside arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Tuan Nguyen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Abstract Introduction: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are important to ensure the stability of the knee joint. Both PCL and ACL can be injured, but PCL injuries are much less common than ACL injuries. In order to summarize the experience and improve the quality of treatment, we conducted the research with the aim is to evaluate the results of arthroscopic all-inside posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft. Materials and methods: From June 2018 to December 2019, all patients who had posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture treated with all-inside arthroscopy PCL reconstructions using semitendinous and gracilis autograft at the Joint Surgery Department of 108 Military Central Hospital were enrolled. The results were evaluated according to the Lysholm - Gilquist and IKDC - 2000 score. Results: 28 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 34,1 years (range: 20 – 55 years old), the mean follow-up time was 15,8 months, good results accounted for 35,7%, fair: 57,1%, average: 7,2%. Conclusions: In patients with PCL rupture, who were treated with arthroscopy PCL reconstruction by all - inside technique, the results were good prospects. However, it needs to assess more patients and to follow-up for long term.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament With Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System and Hamstring Tendon Autograft :A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Luo ◽  
Zhigang Wang ◽  
Zhijiang Li ◽  
Min Wei
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Abstract Background Both Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System(LARS) and hamstring tendon autograft can serve as grafts for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction but few studies compared their differences.This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic reconstruction of PCL with LARS and hamstring tendon autograft. Methods 36 patients who had received PCL reconstruction under arthroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. 15 patients received reconstruction using LARS (LARS group) and 21 using hamstring tendon autograft (HT group). The pre- and post-operative subjective scores and knee stability were evaluated. Results 36 patients were followed up for a period of 2 to 10.5 years (4.11±2.0 years on average). The last follow-up showed that functional scores and knee stability were all significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05). Six months after operation, Lysholm scores and IKDC subjective scores were higher in LARS group than in HT group (P<0.05). Nonetheless, the last follow-up showed no statistically significant differences in the functional scores and the posterior drawer test between the two groups (P>0.05). In LARS group and HT group, 12 and 9 patients, respectively had KT1000 values less than 3 mm, with the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05). In HT group, the diameter of the four-strand hamstring tendon was positively correlated with height (P<0.05),which was 7.37±0.52mm in males and 6.50±0.77 mm in females, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Both LARS and hamstring tendon could achieve good clinical efficacy for PCL reconstruction ，but patients in LARS group had faster functional recovery and better knee stability. LARS is especially suitable for those who hope to resume activities as early as possible.

scholarly journals Early Outcomes of Adolescent ACL Reconstruction With Hybrid Hamstring Tendon Autograft-Allograft Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft Alone

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097998
Author(s):  
Benton E. Heyworth ◽  
Evan T. Zheng ◽  
Patrick Vavken ◽  
Elizabeth S. Liotta ◽  
Dennis E. Kramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: Small-diameter semitendinosus-gracilis tendon autografts may be encountered intraoperatively during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); these have been shown to be at increased risk of graft rupture. One option that surgeons have pursued to reduce the theoretical failure rate of these smaller-diameter grafts is augmenting them with allograft material, thereby forming a larger-diameter hybrid autograft-allograft construct. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in adolescent athletes of primary ACLR using a hybrid autologous hamstring tendon and soft tissue allograft construct versus ACLR using small-diameter hamstring tendon autograft. The hypothesis was that the hybrid hamstring autograft-allograft construct would provide superior short-term results. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 47 patients aged between 12 and 20 years who underwent hybrid graft ACLR (mean diameter, 9.1 mm) at a single institution. Electronic medical records including clinic notes, radiographic images, operative notes, and pathology reports were reviewed for study analysis. A control group of 64 patients who underwent small-diameter hamstring reconstruction (mean diameter, 7.1 mm) without allograft supplementation was compiled. Corresponding clinical, radiographic, and surgical characteristics were collected for the control group to allow for comparative analysis. Results: Mean follow-up was 2.7 years for the hybrid cohort and 2.3 years for the control group. Despite a significantly larger mean graft diameter in the hybrid group as compared with the control group ( P < .001), no significant difference in retear rate was seen between cohorts (hybrid, 9%; control, 13%; P = .554). Patients with hybrid anterior cruciate ligament constructs also underwent a comparable number of reoperations overall ( P = .838). Functionally, all patients with adequate follow-up returned to sports, with no significant difference in time to return to sports between the groups ( P = .213). Radiographically, hybrid graft constructs did not undergo a significantly larger degree of tunnel lysis ( P = .126). Conclusion: A cohort of adolescents with hybrid anterior cruciate ligament grafts was shown to have retear rates and overall clinical results comparable with those of a control group that received small-diameter hamstring tendon autografts alone.

scholarly journals Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature: Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596711987245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Pennock ◽  
Kristina P. Johnson ◽  
Robby D. Turk ◽  
Tracey P. Bastrom ◽  
Henry G. Chambers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Skeletally Immature ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Tendon Grafts ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: It is unclear what the optimal graft choice is for performing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a skeletally immature patient. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes and complications of skeletally immature patients undergoing transphyseal ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft versus a quadriceps tendon autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between 2012 and 2016, 90 skeletally immature patients from a single institution underwent primary transphyseal ACL reconstruction with either a quadriceps tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft based on surgeon preference (n = 3). Patient demographic, injury, radiographic, and surgical variables were documented. Outcome measures included the Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Tegner activity score, pain, satisfaction, and complications such as graft tears and physeal abnormalities. Results: A total of 83 patients (56 hamstring tendon, 27 quadriceps tendon) were available for a minimum follow-up of 2 years or sustained graft failure. The mean age of the patients was 14.8 ± 1.4 years at the time of ACL reconstruction. No differences in chronological age, bone age, sex, patient size, or mechanism of injury were noted between groups. There were no differences in surgical variables, except that the quadriceps tendon grafts were larger than the hamstring tendon grafts (9.6 ± 0.6 mm vs 7.8 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; P < .001). Patient outcomes at a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 0.9 years revealed no differences based on graft type, with mean Lysholm, SANE, pain, satisfaction, and Tegner scores of 96, 93, 0.6, 9.6, and 6.6, respectively, for the quadriceps tendon group and 94, 89, 0.9, 9.2, and 7.1, respectively, for the hamstring tendon group. While there were no physeal complications in either group, patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft were more likely to tear their graft (21% vs 4%, respectively; P = .037). Conclusion: Skeletally immature patients undergoing ACL reconstruction can be successfully managed with either a quadriceps tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft with good short-term outcomes, high rates of return to sport, and low rates of physeal abnormalities. The primary differences between grafts were that the quadriceps tendon grafts were larger and were associated with a lower retear rate. ACL reconstruction performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft may reduce early graft failure in skeletally immature patients.

scholarly journals 20-Year Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: The Catastrophic Effect of Age and Posterior Tibial Slope

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy J. Salmon ◽  
Emma Heath ◽  
Hawar Akrawi ◽  
Justin P. Roe ◽  
James Linklater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Degenerative Change ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Hamstring Tendon Autograft ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: No well-controlled studies have compared the long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft between adolescents and adults. Increased posterior tibial slopes (PTSs) have been reported in the ACL-injured versus controls, but the effect of PTS on the outcome after reconstruction is relatively unexplored. Purpose: To compare the prospective longitudinal outcome of “isolated” ACL ruptures treated with anatomic endoscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft over 20 years in adolescent and adult cohorts and to examine factors for repeat ACL injury. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A single-surgeon series of 200 consecutive patients undergoing isolated primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft were prospectively studied. Subjects were assessed preoperatively and at 2, 7, 15, and 20 years postoperatively. Outcomes included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Evaluation, IKDC subjective scores, KT-1000 instrumented laxity testing, and radiological evaluation of degenerative change and medial tibial slope. Twenty-year outcomes were compared between those who underwent surgery at the age of 18 years or younger (adolescent group, n = 39) and those who underwent surgery when older than 18 years (adult group, n = 161). Results: At 20 years, 179 of 200 subjects were reviewed (89.5%). ACL graft rupture occurred in 37 subjects and contralateral ACL injury in 22 subjects. Of those with intact ACL grafts at 20 years, outcomes were not statistically different between adolescents and adults for the variables of IKDC subjective score ( P = .29), return to preinjury activity level ( P = .84), current activity level ( P = .69), or degree of radiological degenerative change at 20 years ( P = .51). The adolescent group had a higher proportion of grade 1 ligamentous laxity testing compared with the adult group ( P = .003). Overall, ACL graft survival at 20 years was 86% for adults and 61% for adolescents (hazard ration, 3.3; P = .001). The hazard for ACL graft rupture was increased by 4.8 in adolescent males and 2.5 in adolescent females compared with adults. At 20 years, the ACL survival for adolescents with a PTS of ≥12° was 22%. The hazard for ACL graft rupture was increased by 11 in adolescents with a PTS of ≥12° ( P = .001) compared with adults with a PTS <12°. Conclusion: Repeat ACL injury after isolated ACL reconstruction is common, occurring in 1 in 3 over 20 years. In the absence of further injury, isolated ACL reconstruction using this technique was associated with good long-term outcomes with respect to patient-reported outcomes and return to sports, regardless of age. However, mild ligament laxity and ACL graft rupture after ACL reconstruction are significantly more common in adolescents, especially adolescent males, compared with adults. PTS of 12° or more is the strongest predictor of repeat ACL injury, and its negative effect is most pronounced in adolescents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document