Designing Social Media Fundraising Messages: An Experimental Approach to Understanding How Message Concreteness and Framing Influence Donation Intentions

2021 ◽  
pp. 089976402110228
Author(s):  
Anli Xiao ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Denise S. Bortree ◽  
Richard D. Waters

This experiment examined the effects of fundraising message characteristics on donation intentions through a simulated social media campaign. A 2 (abstract vs. concrete message) × 2 (gain vs. loss framing) between-subjects experiment ( n = 213) revealed that a message with detailed fundraising outcomes elicited a greater intention to donate through heightened perceived message credibility, perceived transparency, cognitive elaboration, and empathy. Gain and loss framing, however, did not result in significant differences in donation intentions. Theoretically, this study uncovered the psychological mechanisms through which message concreteness increases donation intentions. Practically, results of this study provided implications for drafting effective fundraising messages that can be disseminated on social media.

2021 ◽  
pp. 101382
Author(s):  
David B. Buller ◽  
Sherry Pagoto ◽  
Katie Baker ◽  
Barbara J. Walkosz ◽  
Joel Hillhouse ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Dusko Prelevic

The phenomenon of post-truth, in which truth (or facts or the best scientific evidence) is brushed aside in public debates, has recently caught the eye of many philosophers, who typically see it as a threat to deliberative democracy. In this paper, it is argued that Gustave Le Bon?s remarks on crowd psychology, which had been very popular in past (and brushed aside later on), might be relevant for a better understanding of psychological mechanisms that lead to post-truth. According to Le Bon, crowds are often irrational, whereas those who try to convince them to do something should use specific techniques of persuasion, such as affirmation, repetition, contagion and prestige, of which the last one can be undermined either by fiasco (the fastest way), or by critique (a bit slower, but nonetheless effective way). It is the age of posttruth that goes towards the neutralization of any critique (Le Bon himself considered such neutralization devastating for democratic societies), which has been, according to some authors, affected to a great extent by technological innovations in media, such as social media that some authors consider anti-social due to their negative impact on society. I argue that Le Bon?s insights might be useful to members of scientific and philosophical community in their attempts to eliminate the spreading of quasi-scientific views in public discourse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (CSCW2) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Shuo Niu ◽  
Cat Mai ◽  
Katherine G. McKim ◽  
Scott McCrickard
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (S2) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Dowshen ◽  
Susan Lee ◽  
B. Matty Lehman ◽  
Marné Castillo ◽  
Cynthia Mollen

BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 344 (may18 2) ◽  
pp. e3538-e3538
Author(s):  
O. Dyer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document