William Warwick James OBE FRCS MCh FDS FLS (1874 to 1965)

2021 ◽  
pp. 096777202110642
Author(s):  
Stanley Gelbier

William Warwick James was one of the most inspiring and outstanding dental surgeons of his time, a key researcher in dentistry and zoology and a pioneer in maxillofacial surgery. Most maxillofacial departments hold sets of his dental elevators. He wrote a major wartime work with Benjamin Fickling on the treatment of jaw and facial injuries.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Dhanjal ◽  
M Ghouri ◽  
S Crank

Abstract Introduction A significant aspect of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery workload relates to trauma, particularly soft-tissue injuries. Contingent on the aetiology of injury, facial wounds require debridement and rapid closure to reduce risk of infection and degree of scarring. The aim was to identify possible risks and frequency of postoperative complications, including problems identified by patients following treatment of facial injuries by the Maxillofacial on-call team. Method Data was retrospectively collected from patients who sustained soft-tissue facial injuries treated by the Maxillofacial team and provided with follow-up appointments from January to August 2020. Computerised clinical notes were accessed to determine patient demographics, mechanism and site of injury, location and time of repair, operator grade and postoperative complications (if any). Results 153 patients required debridement and suturing of a facial injury under local or general anaesthetic. Among these, the male to female ratio was 65:35. 47% of facial injuries resulted from mechanical fall. Lips were found to be the most common site (31%) of injury. Postoperative complication rate was 8% within the 8-month period, with reports of infection, wound dehiscence and haematoma requiring further treatment. 58% of complications resulted from treatment carried out between 5pm-5am with a sole operator (DCT/SHO). 83% of complications followed treatment carried out within the Emergency Department rather than Maxillofacial clinical setting. Conclusion Following facial injury repair, just less than 8% of patients experienced complications, which required corrective treatment. Although facial injuries require immediate care, careful planning and performing treatment in a specialised setup may improve perioperative care, thus clinical outcomes.


1982 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-55
Author(s):  
G. G. Mingazov

An analysis of referrals to our clinic of maxillofacial surgery showed that in the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic there was previously a belated diagnosis and hospitalization, multi-stage movement of patients with facial injuries. 34.1% of patients received specialized care in the clinic on days 4-10, and only 15.5% of patients received on the first day. For 64.7% of patients, first aid was provided by surgeons, doctors on duty in rural, regional, city hospitals, doctors and paramedics of emergency medical care who did not have special experience in the clinic and treatment of facial injuries.


Skull Base ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dalamagidis ◽  
V. Boulti ◽  
A. Mylonas
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Tyndorf ◽  
Bogusława Manowska ◽  
Piotr Arkuszewski ◽  
Ewelina Gaszyńska

Author(s):  
Ibrahim Almutairi ◽  
Abdullah AlQarni ◽  
Mohammad Alharbi ◽  
Ahmed Almutairi ◽  
Mohammed Aldohan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document