Robust Peer Review: Caputo’s Response to Dunleavy
2021 ◽
pp. 104438942110122
In this essay, I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the alternative peer-review processes and the rationale and evidence used by Dunleavy (2021). To move the discussion forward, I end this response with a call to devise a study that would test some of the empirical claims associated with the modified traditional peer-review process I originally proposed (Caputo, 2019) and the one advanced by Dunleavy (2021).
Keyword(s):
2008 ◽
Vol 63
(3)
◽
pp. 160-168
◽
2021 ◽
Vol 2021
(267-268)
◽
pp. 163-167