What Did You Order? Developing Models to Measure the Impact of Usability on Emergency Physician Accuracy Using Computerized Provider Order Entry

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 713-717
Author(s):  
Swaminathan Kandaswamy ◽  
Aaron Z Hettinger ◽  
Raj M. Ratwani
Keyword(s):  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Usability Study ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Test Environment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
Clinical Environments ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improve Patient

Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) is a critical component of electronic health records (EHR). Although widely adopted, the usability of these systems is not well understood. A cross-sectional usability study was conducted at four healthcare systems using two commercially available EHRs. This research aims to predict the accuracy of an order placed in the EHR by emergency medicine physicians. Physician-EHR interactions were recorded during six simulated task scenarios in a test environment. The data from 222 interactions were used to predict the accuracy of the order placed. Multiple models were developed, and their performance was compared. The Random Forest model had the best performance with F1 score 0.82 and AUC of 0.89. These results demonstrate the utility of using keystroke, time and user demographics as variables in predicting accurate order placement. Applying such models to passively monitor EHR usage in real world clinical environments may help improve patient safety and care.

scholarly journals The impact of computerized provider order entry on emergency department flow

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gray ◽  
Christopher M.B. Fernandes ◽  
Kristine Van Aarsen ◽  
Melanie Columbus
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
Left Without Being Seen ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been established as a method to improve patient safety by avoiding medication errors; however, its effect on emergency department (ED) flow remains undefined. We examined the impact of CPOE implementation on three measures of ED throughput: wait time (WT), length of stay (LOS), and the proportion of patients that left without being seen (LWBS).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED patients of 18 years and older presenting to London Health Sciences Centre during July and August 2013 and 2014, before and after implementation of a CPOE system. The three primary variables were compared between time periods. Subgroup analyses were also conducted within each Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level (1–5) individually, as well as for admitted patients only.ResultsA significant increase in WT of 5 minutes (p=0.036) and LOS of 10 minutes (p=0.001), and an increase in LWBS from 7.2% to 8.1% (p=0.002) was seen after CPOE implementation. Admitted patients’ LOS increased by 63 minutes (p<0.001), the WT of CTAS 3 and 5 patients increased by 6 minutes (p=0.001) and 39 minutes (p=0.005), and LWBS proportion increased significantly for CTAS 3–5 patients, from 24.3% to 42.0% (p<0.001) for CTAS 5 patients specifically.ConclusionsCPOE implementation detrimentally impacted all patient flow throughput measures that we examined. The most striking clinically relevant result was the increase in LOS of 63 minutes for admitted patients. This raises the question as to whether the potential detrimental effects to patient safety of CPOE implementation outweigh its benefits.

Computerized provider order entry system: Solution to improve patient safety

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Mahtab Kasaei ◽  
Fahimeh Sadeghi ◽  
Sakineh Saghaeiannejad ◽  
Vahideh Shirzad ◽  
Nahid Tavakoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
System Solution ◽  
Improve Patient

scholarly journals CPOE in Non-Surgical Versus Surgical Specialties: A Qualitative Comparison of Clinical Contexts in the Medication Process

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Niazkhani ◽  
Habibollah Pirnejad ◽  
Antoinette de Bont ◽  
Jos Aarts
Keyword(s):  
Information Needs ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Clinical Context ◽  
Qualitative Comparison ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
Medication Process ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Perceived Impact ◽  
The Impact

Background: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems are implemented in various clinical contexts of a hospital. To identify the role of the clinical context in CPOE use, we compared the impact of a CPOE system on the medication process in both non-surgical and surgical specialties. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of surgical and non-surgical specialties in a 1237-bed, academic hospital in the Netherlands. We interviewed the clinical end users of a computerized medication order entry system in both specialty types and analyzed the interview transcripts to elicit qualitative differences between the clinical contexts, clinicians’ attitudes, and specialty-specific requirements. Results: Our study showed that the differences in clinical contexts between non-surgical and surgical specialties resulted in a disparity between clinicians’ requirements when using CPOE. Non-surgical specialties had a greater medication workload, greater and more diverse information needs to be supported in a timely manner by the system, and thus more intensive interaction with the CPOE system. In turn these factors collectively influenced the perceived impact of the CPOE system on the clinicians’ practice. The non-surgical clinicians expressed less positive attitudes compared to the surgical clinicians, who perceived their interaction with the system to be less intensive and less problematic. Conclusion: Our study shows that clinicians’ different attitudes towards the system and the perceived impact of the system were largely grounded in the clinical context of the units. The study suggests that not merely the CPOE system, the technology itself, influences the perceptions of its users and workflow-related outcomes. The interplay between technology and clinical context of the implementation environment also matters. System design and redesigning efforts should take account of different units’ specific requirements in their particular clinical contexts.

scholarly journals Factors that Determine Comprehensive Categorical Classification of EHR Implementation Levels

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117863292110247
Author(s):  
Soumya Upadhyay ◽  
William Opoku-Agyeman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Categorical Classification ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Panel Design

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have the potential to alleviate patient safety mistakes. Of the various levels of EHR, advanced or higher-level functionalities of EHR are designed to improve patient safety. Certain organizational and environmental factors may pose as barriers toward implementing all of the functionalities, leaving certain hospitals intermediate between basic and comprehensive levels of implementation. This study identifies a comprehensive categorical classification that includes hospitals that have functionalities between basic and comprehensive levels of EHR and determines the organizational and environmental factors that may influence hospitals to implement one or more combinations of these categories. A longitudinal panel design was used. Ordinal logistic regression with random effects model was fitted with robust cluster standard errors. Our sample consisted of non-federal general acute care hospitals utilizing a panel design from 2010 to 2016 with 17 586 hospital-year observations (or an average of 2600 hospitals per year). Larger size hospitals, ones with higher total margin, metropolitan and urban hospitals, system affiliated hospitals, and those in higher managed care penetration areas have higher odds of belonging in one of the higher categories of EHR implementation. Hospitals that can access a greater amount of human resources and financial assets from their environments, may implement higher levels of EHR. Initial and maintenance costs of EHR, interoperability issues, and inability to distribute high costs of training across facilities may stymie implementation of higher EHR functionalities. Policymaking to encourage competition among vendors may possibly lower the implementation price for hospitals with limited resources.

scholarly journals The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multispecialty group practice

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Beth Devine ◽  
Ryan N Hansen ◽  
Jennifer L Wilson-Norton ◽  
N M Lawless ◽  
Albert W Fisk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Group Practice ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
Multispecialty Group ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Impact of commercial computerized provider order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) on medication errors, length of stay, and mortality in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirela Prgomet ◽  
Ling Li ◽  
Zahra Niazkhani ◽  
Andrew Georgiou ◽  
Johanna I Westbrook
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Computerized Provider Order Entry ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of commercial computerized provider order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) on medication errors, length of stay (LOS), and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: We searched for English-language literature published between January 2000 and January 2016 using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. Titles and abstracts of 586 unique citations were screened. Studies were included if they: (1) reported results for an ICU population; (2) evaluated the impact of CPOE or the addition of CDSSs to an existing CPOE system; (3) reported quantitative data on medication errors, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, ICU mortality, and/or hospital mortality; and (4) used a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental study design. Results: Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. The transition from paper-based ordering to commercial CPOE systems in ICUs was associated with an 85% reduction in medication prescribing error rates and a 12% reduction in ICU mortality rates. Overall meta-analyses of LOS and hospital mortality did not demonstrate a significant change. Discussion and Conclusion: Critical care settings, both adult and pediatric, involve unique complexities, making them vulnerable to medication errors and adverse patient outcomes. The currently limited evidence base requires research that has sufficient statistical power to identify the true effect of CPOE implementation. There is also a critical need to understand the nature of errors arising post-CPOE and how the addition of CDSSs can be used to provide greater benefit to delivering safe and effective patient care.

scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF BARCODE MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ON PATIENT SAFETY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seham Sahal Aloufi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Medication Error ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Bar Code ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improve Patient

Patient safety is considered as an essential feature of healthcare system. Many trials have been conducted in order to find ways to improve patient safety, and many reports indicate that medication errors pose a threat to patient safety. Thus, some studies have investigated the impact of bar code medication administration (BCMA) system on medication error reduction during the medication administration procedure. This systematic review (SR) reports the impact of BCMA system on reducing medication errors to improve patient safety; it also compares traditional medication administration with the BCMA system. The review concentrates on the effectiveness of BCMA technology on medication administration errors, and on the accuracy of medication administration. This review also focused on different designs of quantitative studies, as they are more effective at investigating the impact of the intervention than qualitative studies. The findings from this systematic review show various results depending on the nature of the hospital setting. Most of the studies agree that the BCMA system enhances compliance with the 'five rights’' requirement (right drug, right patient, right dose, right time and right route) of medication administration. In addition, BCMA technology identified medication error types that could not be identified with the traditional approach which is applying the 'five rights' of medication administration. The findings of this systematic review also confirm the impact of BCMA system in reducing medication error, preventing adverse events and increasing the accuracy of the medication administration rate. However, BCMA technology did not consistently reduce the overall errors of medication administration. Keyword: Patient Safety, Impact, BCMA, eMAR

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document