Psychopathy Profiles and Personality Assessment Inventory Scores in a Sex Offender Risk Assessment Field Setting

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112110153
Author(s):  
Katherine E. McCallum ◽  
Marcus T. Boccaccini ◽  
Jorge G. Varela ◽  
Darrel B. Turner

A growing body of research suggests there are identifiable psychopathy subtypes among offenders scored on Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 2003). We used latent profile analysis to examine the generalizability of these subtype findings to PCL-R scores ( N = 615) assigned in a sex offender risk assessment field setting and to examine how offender subtypes differ on measures of comorbid psychopathology, risk, and treatment amenability from the Personality Assessment Inventory. Consistent with prior research, we identified four subtypes when using PCL-R scores from all offenders: Prototypic psychopathy ( n = 239, 38.9%), callous-conning ( n = 154, 25.0%), sociopathic ( n = 96, 15.6%), and general offenders ( n = 126, 20.5%). Prototypic and sociopathic subtypes exhibited the highest levels of comorbid psychopathology and risk for potential violence. We identified classes consistent with primary ( n = 66, 36.7%) and secondary ( n = 114, 63.3%) psychopathy among offenders with PCL-R total scores ≥ 25, and found higher levels of comorbid psychopathology and potential for violence among those in the secondary psychopathy class. Findings provide support the generalizability of existing PCL-R subtype findings to field scores and show how those with similar PCL-R total scores may differ on scores from commonly used multiscale inventories.

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Larcombe

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Willem van den Berg ◽  
Wineke Smid ◽  
Klaartje Schepers ◽  
Edwin Wever ◽  
Daan van Beek ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Helmus ◽  
R. Karl Hanson ◽  
Kelly M. Babchishin ◽  
David Thornton

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Witt ◽  
Joseph DelRusso ◽  
Jessica Oppenheim ◽  
Glenn Ferguson

After discussing the historical, legal, and criminal justice context, the article reviews risk assessment principles for sex offenders. Issues of actuarial vs. clinical prediction, base-rate considerations, and duration of prediction are reviewed. The article next addresses specific factors found to predict sex offender recidivism, factors such as indicators of deviant sexual interest and an antisocial, psychopathic lifestyle. Finally, the article provides a current application in the form of New Jersey's Registrant Risk Assessment Scale to illustrate the risk assessment principles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document