Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block for implantable port catheters: Does it show a significant difference in pain control?

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982098735
Author(s):  
Emre Can Çelebioğlu ◽  
Mehmet Sadık Bilgiç

Background: Nerve blocks have been used for decades at head and neck region interventions and recently introduced as an alternative option for subcutaneous port implantation. This study aimed to compare two different local anesthesia techniques used during subcutaneous port implantation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 107 patients who were categorized into two groups according to the local anesthesia techniques used during port implantations. Group 1 underwent local infiltration anesthesia and Group 2 received an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block. In both groups, prilocaine 2% was used for skin anesthesia and no other systemic anesthetic drugs or additional local anesthetics were administered during port implantation. Local anesthetic doses were 400 mg in Group 1 and 200 mg in Group 2. The time required for adequate cutaneous anesthesia, procedure time, complication rate and visual analog scale (VAS) score were recorded for each patient. Results: Groups 1 and 2 contained 58 and 49 patients respectively. Both groups showed similar demographic distributions of patients ( p > 0.05). Mean procedure times and the time required for adequate cutaneous anesthesia were longer in Group 2 ( p < 0.05). Group 2 also showed 12 immediate complications, although they were temporary and recovered without any intervention under surveillance. Mean VAS scores during port implantation were similar in both groups [Group 1: 1.17(±0.60), Group 2: 1.1(±0.62)] ( p > 0.05). Conclusions: The VAS scores did not differ significantly between groups. Although a supraclavicular nerve block may require lower local anesthetic doses for similar cutaneous anesthesia, it is associated with higher immediate complication rates due to unintended blockade of the peripheral nerves. Thus, if the nerve block is preferred over local infiltration anesthesia during port implantation, to prevent life-threatening complications, caution needed especially for the patients with contralateral vocal cord or diaphragm paralysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlknur Yıldırım ◽  
Ayşe Çiğdem Tütüncü ◽  
Süleyman Bademler ◽  
İlker Özgür ◽  
Mukaddes Demiray ◽  
...  

Aim: To examine whether the real-time ultrasound-guided venipuncture for implantable venous port placement is safer than the traditional venipuncture. Methods: The study analyzed the results of 2153 venous ports placed consecutively from January 2009 to January 2016. A total of 922 patients in group 1 and 1231 patients in group 2 were admitted with venous port placed using the traditional landmark subclavian approach and real-time ultrasound-guided axillary approach, respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients, early (pneumothorax, pinch-off syndrome, arterial puncture, hematoma, and malposition arrhythmia) and late (deep vein thrombosis, obstruction, infection, erosion-dehiscence, and rotation of the port chamber) complications and the association of these complications with the implantation method were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients between the two groups. The overall and early complications in group 2 were significantly lower than those in group 1. Pinch-off syndrome only developed in group 1. Seven patients and two patients had pneumothorax in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Puncture number was significantly associated with the development of the overall complications. Conclusion: The ultrasound-guided axillary approach may be preferred as a method to reduce the risk of both early and late complications. Large, randomized, controlled prospective trials will be helpful in determining a safer implantable venous port implantation technique.


2020 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Aamir Huda ◽  
Bimal Kumar Hajra ◽  
Payel Mitra ◽  
Preeti Banerjee ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Background: postoperative pain is a type of acute pain in the immediate postoperative period which has both pathophysiological and therapeutic point of view. Different drugs through different routes are being used for relief of postoperative pain. we have analysed the efficacy of two different routes via femoral nerve block and local infiltration of ropivacaine for post-arthoscopic pain relief. Materials and methods: we have conducted the study from November 2017 to March 2018.60 patients undergoing arthoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery wer randomly assigned into two groups;in a double blinded manner( group 1 and group 2). Group 1 received 0.2% of 20ml ropivacaine for blocking the femoral nerve of the affected limb whereas group 2 received the same drug through local infiltration of wound edges and subcutaneous plane. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale(VAS) and rescue analgesia with 75mg injection diclofenac was given on demand when VAS score is >4 and number of times injection diclofenac was given in the 24 hours postoperative period. Analysis: demographic variables were quite comparable between the groups. The mean number of times of rescue analgesia was high in group 2 (2.9333+/-0.9444) than group 1 whose mean number of rescue analgesia was 1.4667+/- 0.7761 and difference of mean was statistically significant ( p<0.0001). Conclusion: compared with local infiltration of ropivacaine femoral nerve block with ropivacaine provides better analgesia after ACL reconstruction with lesser diclofenac consumption and lower VAS score.


Author(s):  
Lury Bueno Wako Kitahara ◽  
Vanessa Paula da Silva ◽  
Gabriel Peres ◽  
Hélio Amante Miot ◽  
Juliano Vilaverde Schmitt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document