End-of-life decision making for persons with dementia: Proxies' perception of support

Dementia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunjin Noh ◽  
Jung Kwak
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Need Support ◽  
Sources Of Support ◽  
Perception Of Support ◽  
Spiritual Conflicts ◽  
End Of Life Decision

Healthcare proxies need support in making end-of-life decisions for persons with dementia (PWD). This study explored perceptions of support in decision making among proxies of PWD through semi-structured interviews with 20 proxies. Thematic analysis identified three sources of support: family, doctors, and religiosity/spirituality. Family's engagement in care discussions and support for proxies' decisions were viewed helpful while disagreement or criticism, combined with lack of knowledge about PWD's condition and needs, were not. Doctors were viewed supportive when proxies felt doctors respected their opinions and PWD's wishes. Doctor-PWD rapport influenced proxies' views of medical advice from doctors. Although religiosity/spirituality provided guidance and hope, it also presented conflicts when PWD's wishes differed from proxies' beliefs. Therefore, families of PWD should be provided with assistance in reconciling or mediating family conflicts and further education about the illness trajectory as well as risks/benefits of life-sustaining treatments. Assistance should also be provided to address religious/spiritual conflicts.

The enactment stage of end-of-life decision-making for children

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Jane Elizabeth Sullivan ◽  
Lynn Heather Gillam ◽  
Paul Terence Monagle
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Medical Intervention ◽  
Process Time ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Bereaved Parents ◽  
Process Factors ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

AbstractObjectivesTypically pediatric end-of-life decision-making studies have examined the decision-making process, factors, and doctors’ and parents’ roles. Less attention has focussed on what happens after an end-of-life decision is made; that is, decision enactment and its outcome. This study explored the views and experiences of bereaved parents in end-of-life decision-making for their child. Findings reported relate to parents’ experiences of acting on their decision. It is argued that this is one significant stage of the decision-making process.MethodsA qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with bereaved parents, who had discussed end-of-life decisions for their child who had a life-limiting condition and who had died. Data were thematically analysed.ResultsTwenty-five bereaved parents participated. Findings indicate that, despite differences in context, including the child’s condition and age, end-of-life decision-making did not end when an end-of-life decision was made. Enacting the decision was the next stage in a process. Time intervals between stages and enactment pathways varied, but the enactment was always distinguishable as a separate stage. Decision enactment involved making further decisions - parents needed to discern the appropriate time to implement their decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining medical treatment. Unexpected events, including other people’s actions, impacted on parents enacting their decision in the way they had planned. Several parents had to re-implement decisions when their child recovered from serious health issues without medical intervention.Significance of resultsA novel, critical finding was that parents experienced end-of-life decision-making as a sequence of interconnected stages, the final stage being enactment. The enactment stage involved further decision-making. End-of-life decision-making is better understood as a process rather than a discrete once-off event. The enactment stage has particular emotional and practical implications for parents. Greater understanding of this stage can improve clinician’s support for parents as they care for their child.

‘It all depends!’: A qualitative study of preferences for place of care and place of death in terminally ill patients and their family caregivers

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 802-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Gerber ◽  
Barbara Hayes ◽  
Christina Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Terminally Ill Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decision

Background: It is often suggested that terminally ill patients favour end-of-life care at home. Yet, it is unclear how these preferences are formed, if the process is similar for patients and family caregivers, and if there are discrepancies between preferences for place of care and place of death. Understanding these nuances is essential to support people in their decision-making and ultimately provide better care at the end-of-life. Aim: To gain an in-depth understanding of how terminally ill patients and their family caregivers make decisions about preferred place of care and place of death. Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and family caregivers, which were analysed thematically using qualitative description. Setting/participants: A total of 17 participants (8 patients and 9 caregivers) recruited from an acute palliative care hospital ward, a sub-acute hospice unit, and a palliative homecare organisation in Melbourne, Australia. Results: The process of forming location preferences was shaped by uncertainty relating to the illness, the caregiver and the services. Patients and caregivers dealt with this uncertainty on a level of thoughts, emotions, and actions. At the end of this process, patients and caregivers expressed their choices as contextual, personal, relational, conditional and flexible preferences. Conclusions: These findings suggest that in many cases end-of-life decision-making does not conclude with a clear and stable choice. Understanding the reasons for the malleability of preferences and the process of how they are formed has implications for both clinicians and researchers.

scholarly journals ‘It all depends!’ – Preferences for place of care and place of death in terminally ill patients and their carers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Gerber ◽  
BARBARA HAYES ◽  
CHRISTINA BRYANT
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Terminally Ill Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

<div><b>Background</b>: It is often suggested that terminally ill patients favour end-of-life care at home. Yet, it is unclear how these preferences are formed, if the process is similar for patients and carers, and if there are discrepancies between preferences for place of care and place of death. Understanding these nuances is essential to support people in their decision-making and ultimately provide better care at the end of life.</div><div><b>Aim</b>: To gain an in-depth understanding of how terminally ill patients and their family caregivers make decisions about preferred place of care and place of death.</div><div>Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and carers, which were analysed thematically using qualitative description.</div><div><b>Setting/ participants</b>: A total of 17 participants (eight patients and nine carers) recruited from an acute palliative care hospital ward, a sub-acute hospice unit, and a palliative</div><div>homecare organisation in Melbourne, Australia.</div><div><b>Results</b>: The process of forming preferences for place of care and place of death was shaped by uncertainty relating to the illness, the carer and the services. Participants dealt with this uncertainty on a level of thoughts, emotions, and actions. At the end of this process, participants expressed their choices as conditional, personal, relational, contextual and flexible preferences.</div><div><b>Conclusions</b>: End-of-life decision-making rarely ends with a clear and stable choice. Understanding the reasons for the malleability of preferences and the process of how they are</div><div>formed has implications for both clinicians and researchers.</div>

The meanings of “hope” to patients with cancer, nearing the end of their lives

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18567-18567
Author(s):  
I. N. Olver ◽  
J. A. Eliott
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Life Lessons ◽  
Data Saturation ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

18567 Background: In two studies of the speech of patients with cancer about end-of-life decision-making, the word hope was often spontaneously used. In 23 patients earlier in their disease there was a difference between hope used as a noun, often objective, outside the patient’s control, and presented as “no hope”, or as a verb which was directed by patients and facilitated imagining a positive future (Qual Health Res 2002, 12: 173–193). In a second study 28 patients judged within 3 months of dying, following unprompted use of hope during interview, were specifically prompted to talk about hope. Methods: Discourse analysis was used to analyze the speech from the semi-structured interviews of the patients. The sample size was determined by data saturation. Results: All in the second study were Caucasian, average age 61, 15 males, 18 had partners and 19 were Christian, 1 Druid, and 8 listing no religion. Ten patients made reference to hope as variable in amount. In general the more the better, but even 1%, while trivial scientifically, may be important personally. The problem with quantifiable hope is that it is perceived to dwindle with the medical prognosis with which “no hope” is most often identified. Twenty patients hoped for a longer life although 19 had specifically indicated that they were dying, suggesting that this hope was not death denying. Most wanted more time to achieve tasks and be with family. Hoping recognized uncertainty yet attested to the value patients placed on various activities. Eight talked of hoping for a cure, although this was not overwhelming in the present. Some mentioned the possibility of a miracle cure, reinforced by the construction that medicine gives hope. Hope sometimes shifted from life to either an acceptable dying in 8 patients or to focus on others. The legacy to others could be objects or life lessons. Hopes can be shared by partners and can change. Two patients spoke of hope sourced from God and as enduring beyond death. Conclusions: Patients found it challenging to talk of hope in the abstract. Hope can be positive and sustaining or disillusioning when not attained. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals ‘It all depends!’ – Preferences for place of care and place of death in terminally ill patients and their carers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Gerber ◽  
BARBARA HAYES ◽  
CHRISTINA BRYANT
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Terminally Ill Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

<div><b>Background</b>: It is often suggested that terminally ill patients favour end-of-life care at home. Yet, it is unclear how these preferences are formed, if the process is similar for patients and carers, and if there are discrepancies between preferences for place of care and place of death. Understanding these nuances is essential to support people in their decision-making and ultimately provide better care at the end of life.</div><div><b>Aim</b>: To gain an in-depth understanding of how terminally ill patients and their family caregivers make decisions about preferred place of care and place of death.</div><div>Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and carers, which were analysed thematically using qualitative description.</div><div><b>Setting/ participants</b>: A total of 17 participants (eight patients and nine carers) recruited from an acute palliative care hospital ward, a sub-acute hospice unit, and a palliative</div><div>homecare organisation in Melbourne, Australia.</div><div><b>Results</b>: The process of forming preferences for place of care and place of death was shaped by uncertainty relating to the illness, the carer and the services. Participants dealt with this uncertainty on a level of thoughts, emotions, and actions. At the end of this process, participants expressed their choices as conditional, personal, relational, contextual and flexible preferences.</div><div><b>Conclusions</b>: End-of-life decision-making rarely ends with a clear and stable choice. Understanding the reasons for the malleability of preferences and the process of how they are</div><div>formed has implications for both clinicians and researchers.</div>

End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Schuklenk ◽  
Johannes J. M. van Delden ◽  
Jocelyn Downie ◽  
Sheila McLean ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Royal Society ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

The implications of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 for advance care planning and decision making

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Chapman ◽  
Ben Lobo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Current Context ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
End Of Life Decision

This chapter provides an overview of the MCA’s impact on end-of-life care. It situates the MCA in the current context of policy and practice. It describes how the MCA can be used to improve care, enable people to express and protect choices, and empower and enable the professional and/or the proxy decision maker. It also presents an introduction and explanation of the role of the IMCA and how it might apply to advance care planning (ACP) and end of life decision making, and an explanation of the legal and ethical process involved in reaching best interest decisions, especially for potentially vulnerable people in care homes and other settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document