Corrigendum to Effects of a Story Grammar Intervention With Repeated Retells for English Learners With Language Impairments

This study investigated the effects of a narrative intervention that employed repeated story retells and a Story Grammar Marker on the oral narrative skills of Spanish-speaking English learners with language impairments. Four third- and fourth-grade students participated in the study. Using a single-case multiple probe across participants design, the authors measured three dependent variables: narrative organization skills, narrative productivity, and syntactic complexity. As a result of the intervention, stories became more cohesive and scores for narrative organization increased by approximately 7 points from baseline to intervention across participants. Smaller effects for narrative complexity and syntactic complexity measures were noted. Implications for future research and for practice are provided.

Download Full-text

Effects of Pictures Versus Orally Presented Stories on Story Retellings by Children With Language Impairment

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology ◽

10.1044/1058-0360.0501.86 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 86-96 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

Phyllis Schneider

Keyword(s):

Clinical Assessment ◽

Language Impairment ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Language Impairments ◽

Story Grammar ◽

Extraneous Information ◽

Within Subjects

Narratives can be a useful clinical assessment tool, but some thought must be given to the type of stimuli used to elicit them. For the current study, children with language impairments (ages 5;7–9;9) told stories from pictures, retold orally presented stories, and retold stories presented both orally and pictorially. Within-subjects comparisons showed that the best stories (in terms of complete episodes and number of information units) were produced when children listened to stories without pictures. The stories containing the least story grammar information and the greatest extraneous information, but with the fewest indicators of formulation load (mazes), were produced when children viewed the pictures without hearing an oral version. Implications for choice of narrative stimuli are discussed.

Download Full-text

Early-Childhood Education for the Developmentally Delayed: Diagnosis, Intervention, and Evaluation

Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools ◽

10.1044/0161-1461.1002.81 ◽

1979 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 81-92

Author(s):

Susan Freedman Gilbert

Keyword(s):

Early Childhood ◽

Early Childhood Education ◽

School Children ◽

Developmental Delays ◽

Delayed Diagnosis ◽

Language Impairments ◽

Developmentally Delayed ◽

Speech And Language ◽

Childhood Education

This paper describes the referral, diagnostic, interventive, and evaluative procedures used in a self-contained, behaviorally oriented, noncategorical program for pre-school children with speech and language impairments and other developmental delays.

Download Full-text

School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Adherence to Practice Guidelines for Assessment of English Learners

Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools ◽

10.1044/2020_lshss-20-00037 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-12

Author(s):

Virginia L. Dubasik ◽

Dubravka Svetina Valdivia

Keyword(s):

Professional Practice ◽

Practice Guidelines ◽

Case History ◽

English Learners ◽

Online Survey ◽

Dynamic Assessment ◽

Federal Legislation ◽

Assessment Practices ◽

Speech Language Pathologists ◽

School Based

Purpose The purpose of this study was to ascertain the extent to which school-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) assessment practices with individual English learners (ELs) align with federal legislation and professional practice guidelines. Specifically, we were interested in examining SLPs' use of multiple tools during individual EL assessments, as well as relationships between practices and number of types of training experiences. Method School-based SLPs in a Midwestern state were recruited in person or via e-mail to complete an online survey pertaining to assessment. Of the 562 respondents who completed the survey, 222 (39.5%) indicated past or present experience with ELs, and thus, their data were included in the analyses. The questionnaire solicited information about respondent's demographics, caseload composition, perceived knowledge and skills and training experiences pertaining to working with ELs (e.g., graduate school, self-teaching, professional conferences), and assessment practices used in schools. Results The majority of respondents reported using multiple tools rather than a single tool with each EL they assess. Case history and observation were tools used often or always by the largest number of participants. SLPs who used multiple tools reported using both direct (e.g., standardized tests, dynamic assessment) and indirect tools (e.g., case history, interviews). Analyses revealed low to moderate positive associations between tools, as well as the use of speech-language samples and number of types of training experiences. Conclusions School-based SLPs in the current study reported using EL assessment practices that comply with federal legislation and professional practice guidelines for EL assessment. These results enhance our understanding of school-based SLPs' assessment practices with ELs and may be indicative of a positive shift toward evidence-based practice.

Download Full-text