Branched Endovascular Aortic Plug in Patients With Infrarenal Aortic Graft Infection and Hostile Anatomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-333
Author(s):  
Hamid Gavali ◽  
Kevin Mani ◽  
Mia Furebring ◽  
John Mogensen ◽  
Anders Wanhainen

Purpose: To present a novel 4-branched endovascular aortic plug (BEVAP) for treatment of patients with infrarenal aortic graft infection. Case Reports: Two polymorbid male patients with aortic graft infections and an unsuturable diseased paravisceral aorta were treated under compassionate use with a custom-made stent-graft. The BEVAP is a factory-modified Zenith t-Branch thoracoabdominal endovascular graft with the distal tubular main graft portion removed, creating an aortic plug that excludes the abdominal aorta while maintaining perfusion to the visceral organs. The BEVAP device is deployed using a femoral approach, and the branches are accessed through an axillary approach. A standard axillobifemoral bypass is created to perfuse the lower body. One to 2 days later, the infected infrarenal graft is resected without the need of aortic clamping or closure of the aortic stump. The BEVAP device in these 2 cases resulted in thrombosis of the abdominal aorta and the infected graft prior to explantation. Conclusion: Using the BEVAP enables radical treatment of selected patients with hostile anatomy and infrarenal aortic graft infections who have an aneurysmal paravisceral aortic segment that prevents traditional radical surgical treatment with in situ reconstruction or extra-anatomical bypass.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (jul29 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2013010289-bcr2013010289 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Karpenko ◽  
P. V. Ignatenko ◽  
A. M. Beliaev

Angiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 370-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Batt ◽  
Patrick Feugier ◽  
Fabrice Camou ◽  
Amandine Coffy ◽  
Eric Senneville ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (C) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Srdjan Babic ◽  
Vuk Jovanovic ◽  
Milan Marinkovic ◽  
Slobodan Tanaskovic ◽  
Predrag Gajin ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Aortic graft infection is one of the most serious complications of vascular reconstruction with the incidence of 1%. The clinical presentation can vary, which delays the diagnosis. CASE REPORTS: Infections in our patients affected iliac, inguinal region, and retroperitoneum, which are not relatively common sites of graft infection. We present clinical presentation, imaging procedures, and surgical treatment of three patients with unknown cause of late graft infection after 6, 7, and 9 years. CONCLUSION: In our presentations, the etiological factors of the infection are not known, but they suggest that events in the gastrointestinal tract may be related to them. Aggressive surgery should be taken into consideration as a first choice in the similar cases.


2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 503 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Batt ◽  
E. Jean-Baptiste ◽  
S. O'Connor ◽  
P.-J. Bouillanne ◽  
P. Haudebourg ◽  
...  

Aim: Primary outcome measures was to analyze the clinical consequence of patients who treated for infrarenal aorta synthetic graft infection ( SGI) with extra-anatomical bypass (axillobifemoral (AXF)) or in situ reconstruction (ISR). Secondary outcome measure was to show bacteriological analysis of abdominal aorta graft infection. Method: Analysis of medical records of 24 patients treated for SGI at Jordanian Royal Medical Services between June 2010 and Aug 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. For all patients, we recorded clinical features , morbidity and mortality , as well as bacteriology results, and antibiotic treatment . Result: We identified 24(3%) patients with SGI .The median follow up duration was 22 months range (8-84months). The median age was 52 years and 18 were males. An in situ prosthetic graft replacement, using rifampin-soaked polyester graft was performed in 10 patients(42%) and AXF in 14 patients((58%). The early hospital mortality rate was 4 (17 %.) owing to bowel ischemia 1 patient, 2 patients with septicemia and one patient with aortic stump blowout . There were no late procedure-related deaths during follow up period Primary patency and limb salvage rates at 3 years were 80 %(2 patients ) for ISR and 90%( 2 patients) for AXF. The incidence of graft reinfection was 10% (1 patient) for ISR and 8 %(2 patients) for AXF. Graft reinfection occurred in 3 patients (12.5%) was not associated with procedure-related death .Microbiology specimens obtained from the graft and the tissues were positive in 21 patients(88%). Poly microbial Gram-positive organisms were the most dominant bacteria found in 10 patients (42%). The mean length of hospital stay was 17 days . Conclusion: According to our study ISR and AXF is a safe and effective in treatment of aortic graft infection. Graft reinfection occurred in 12.5% of the patients. The graft patency and limb salvages rates were considered satisfactory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document