scholarly journals Evaluating Passage and Order Effects of Oral Reading Fluency Passages in Second Grade: A Partial Replication

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin A. Chaparro ◽  
Mike Stoolmiller ◽  
Yonghan Park ◽  
Scott K. Baker ◽  
Deni Basaraba ◽  
...  

Progress monitoring has been adopted as an integral part of multi-tiered support systems. Oral reading fluency (ORF) is the most established assessment for progress-monitoring purposes. To generate valid trend lines or slopes, ORF passages must be of equivalent difficulty. Recently, however, evidence indicates that ORF passages are not equivalent, potentially hindering our ability to generate valid student trend lines for decision making. This study examines passage and order effects on the estimation of ORF scores using a set of second-grade passages. A single group with counterbalancing design was employed to randomly assign 156 second-grade students to three different orders of passages. Scores from the passages were examined using growth curve modeling and empirical Bayes estimates. Results indicate that passage effects were substantial, but order effects were small but significant. The impact of passage and order effects on research design, equating methods, and measure development is considered.

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Kane Salvador ◽  
Jason Schoeneberger ◽  
Lynne Tingle ◽  
Bob Algozzine

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Goldberg ◽  
Elana R. Weinberger ◽  
Nina Goodman ◽  
Shoshana Ross

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Amy-Jane Griffiths ◽  
Amanda M. VanDerHeyden ◽  
Mary Skokut ◽  
Elena Lilles

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy-Jane Griffiths ◽  
Amanda M. VanDerHeyden ◽  
Mary Skokut ◽  
Elena Lilles

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 565-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunsoo Cho ◽  
Philip Capin ◽  
Greg Roberts ◽  
Sharon Vaughn

Within multitiered instructional delivery models, progress monitoring is a key mechanism for determining whether a child demonstrates an adequate response to instruction. One measure commonly used to monitor the reading progress of students is oral reading fluency (ORF). This study examined the extent to which ORF slope predicts reading comprehension outcomes for fifth-grade struggling readers ( n = 102) participating in an intensive reading intervention. Quantile regression models showed that ORF slope significantly predicted performance on a sentence-level fluency and comprehension assessment, regardless of the students’ reading skills, controlling for initial ORF performance. However, ORF slope was differentially predictive of a passage-level comprehension assessment based on students’ reading skills when controlling for initial ORF status. Results showed that ORF explained unique variance for struggling readers whose posttest performance was at the upper quantiles at the end of the reading intervention, but slope was not a significant predictor of passage-level comprehension for students whose reading problems were the most difficult to remediate.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
Mary J. York ◽  
Barbara R. Foorman ◽  
Kristi L. Santi ◽  
David J. Francis

We examined student-, classroom-, and school-level effects in predicting second-grade Spanish-speaking children’s oral reading fluency in Spanish. Teachers in 67 randomly selected urban schools administered the Tejas LEE to 1,537 first- and second-grade students. Oral reading fluency was measured in the passages students read for comprehension. Covariates were mean fluency in Grade 1, variability in fluency in Grade 1, degree of grouping in the school, and the proportion of second-grade students in the classroom and/or the school taking the Tejas LEE. Treatment effects were administration format (paper, desktop, handheld) and type of teacher support (no mentoring, web mentoring, and on-site plus web mentoring). Second-grade teachers positively affected students’ reading fluency when (a) they administered the Tejas LEE on paper with the associated paper reports in classrooms of bilingual students, and (b) they either received web mentoring and had relatively homogeneous classrooms or received on-site or no mentoring and had ability-grouped classes. Implications for interpreting assessment results are discussed in the context of the type of support provided to teachers and the grouping of bilingual students by language and/or by ability.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelli D. Cummings ◽  
Yonghan Park ◽  
Holle A. Bauer Schaper

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document