Las inteligencias múltiples en la clase de educación física; una experiencia formativa con alumnos de educación primaria (Multiple intelligences in physical education class; a formative experience in primary school students)

Este trabajo buscó descubrir de qué manera la clase de educación física puede favorecer la manifestación de las inteligencias múltiples en la resolución de problemas en 27 alumnos de ocho a nueve años de un grupo de cuarto grado de una escuela primaria. Mediante el método cualitativo en la aplicación de una secuencia didáctica de siete sesiones se recogieron datos mediante una evaluación formativa utilizando entrevistas, observación y el cuaderno de educación física que los niños utilizaron a lo largo de la intervención donde expresaron parte de su experiencia y aprendizajes que adquirieron en la clase de educación física. Como resultado se observa que los alumnos expresan de manera específica los aprendizajes obtenidos en la secuencia didáctica en donde se manifiestan las inteligencias múltiples para la resolución de problemas permitiendo conseguir los objetivos de la secuencia didáctica. Se concluye la importancia de fortalecer una clase de educación física inclusiva mediante el enfoque de las inteligencias múltiples en donde los alumnos puedan expresar sus habilidades y capacidades para lograr los aprendizajes esperados de educación física, se enfatiza la necesidad de trabajar las competencias didácticas en los docentes para planificar escenarios aptos y estimulantes que permitan en el alumnado lograr un desarrollo integral. Abstract. This work sought to discover how physical education class can favor the manifestation of multiple intelligences in problem solving in eight- to nine-year-old elementary school students. Through the qualitative method in the application of a didactic sequence of seven sessions, data was collected through a formative evaluation using interviews, observation and the physical education notebook that the children used throughout the intervention where they expressed part of their experience and learning that acquired in physical education class. As a result, it is observed that the students express in a specific way the learning obtained in the didactic sequence where multiple intelligences are manifested for solving problems, allowing to achieve the objectives of the didactic sequence. The importance of strengthening an inclusive physical education class through the approach of multiple intelligences is concluded where students can express their abilities and capacities to achieve the expected learning of physical education, the need to work on didactic skills in teachers is emphasized to plan suitable and stimulating scenarios that allow students to achieve development.

Learning the Disciplines Through Linguistic Feedback: Contribution to the Development of a Discipline-Specific, Formative Evaluation of Students’ Assignments

Students write to learn. Besides, enculturation to the disciplinary discourse happens during writing. Feedback on the assignments from the students scaffolds students’ writing development and learning paths. However, knowledge about the relationship between language, including argumentation in the discipline, on one hand, and the content of the discipline, on the other, is needed. This article is based on a socio-cultural approach to writing in the disciplines, and theory on feedback, and focuses on the relationship between the meso-level of texts (sentences, clauses, word choice) and the content of the discipline. We discuss how insight into the meso-level of texts may be used to improve and to develop feedback and formative evaluation. Cases from an intervention project in a Danish upper secondary school are included, and indicate that teachers and students assign a lower priority to feedback on the meso-level. This article claims that providing feedback on the meso-level strengthens writing development and students’ learning processes. To illustrate how this may be accomplished two texts are analyzed: one from a history class and one from a biology class.

Evaluating and extending the Informed Consent Ontology for representing permissions from the clinical domain

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, revise, and extend the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO) for expressing clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. This study followed a formative evaluation design and used a bottom-up modeling approach. Data were collected from the literature on US federal regulations and a study of clinical consent forms. Eleven federal regulations and fifteen permission-sentences from clinical consent forms were iteratively modeled to identify entities and their relationships, followed by community reflection and negotiation based on a series of predetermined evaluation questions. ICO included fifty-two classes and twelve object properties necessary when modeling, demonstrating appropriateness of extending ICO for the clinical domain. Twenty-six additional classes were imported into ICO from other ontologies, and twelve new classes were recommended for development. This work addresses a critical gap in formally representing permissions clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. It makes missing content available to the OBO Foundry, enabling use alongside other widely-adopted biomedical ontologies. ICO serves as a machine-interpretable and interoperable tool for responsible reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data at scale.

Pengembangan E-Modul Matakuliah Masalah Nilai Awal Syarat Batas Berbasis Experiential Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa

Penalaran matematis merupakan salah satu kemampuan matematis yang perlu dan penting dimiliki oleh mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika. Penalaran matematis merupakan proses berpikir matematik dalam memperoleh kesimpulan matematis berdasarkan fakta-fakta, konsep dan metode yang relevan. Dilain pihak, fakta menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UNRI belum terlalu baik atau dapat dikatakan rendah terutama pada matakuliah Masalah Nilai Awal dan Syarat Batas (MNASB). Hal ini ditunjukkan oleh fakta rendahnya capaian hasil belajar mahasiswa pada matakuliah tersebut dalam tiga tahun terakhir. Kemudian, berhubung dengan wabah COVID-19 yang terjadi saat ini termasuk di Pekanbaru, Riau yang memaksa institusi-institusi pendidikan tatap muka untuk bertransformasi menjadi institusi pendidikan jarak jauh dengan sistim pembelajaran secara daring. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan tipe development studies dengan dua tahapan yaitu tahapan preliminary evaluation dan formative evaluation. Tujuan akhir penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan produk berupa E-Modul berbasis pendekatan experiential learning yang potensial untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa E-Modul yang dikembangkan sudah memenuhi apek validitas dan praktikalitas serta potensial untuk mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa. E-Modul yang dikembangkan ini diharapkan sebagai contoh dan pedoman oleh dosen, mahasiswa dan institusi pendidikan tinggi dalam menyelenggarakan pembelajaran matematika yang berorientasi kemampuan penalaran matematis sesuai dengan tuntutan kurikulum. Bentuk soal pada E-Modul matakuliah MNASB yang diterapkan dalam proses pembelajaran berupa soal-soal non rutin sehingga dapat mengasah kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa.

‘Trying to fly the plane while we were building it’. Applying a learning health systems approach to evaluate early-stage barriers and facilitators to implementing primary care transformation: a qualitative study

ObjectiveA learning health system (LHS) uses data to generate evidence and answer questions required to continually improve system performance and patient care. Given the complexities of practice transformation, an area where LHS is particularly important is the study of primary care transformation (PCT) as PCT generates several practice-level questions that require study where the findings can be readily implemented. In May 2019, a large integrated health delivery system in Minnesota began implementation of a population management PCT in two of its 40 primary care clinics. In this model of care, patients are grouped into one of five service bundles based on their complexity of care; patient appointment lengths and services provided are then tailored to each service bundle. The objective of this study was to examine the use of a LHS in PCT by utilising the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to categorise implementation lessons from the initial two PCT clinics to inform further implementation of the PCT within the health system.DesignThis was a formative evaluation in which semistructured qualitative interviews were carried out. Observational field notes were also taken. Inductive coding of the data was performed and resultant codes were mapped to the CFIR.SettingTwo suburban primary care clinics in the Twin Cities, Minnesota.ParticipantsTwenty-two care team members from the first two clinics to adopt the PCT.ResultsSeventeen codes emerged to describe care team members’ perceived implementation influences. Codes occurred in each of the five CFIR domains (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals and process), with most codes occurring in the ‘inner setting’ domain.ConclusionsUsing an LHS approach to determine early-stage implementation influences is key to guiding further PCT implementation, understanding modifications that need to be made and additional research that needs to occur.

PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN PUZZLE PADA MATERI MEMBACA PERMULAAN SISWA KELAS 1 SD NEGERI 77 PRABUMULIH

This study aims to: Produce reading mateirals which is validm, practical and effective, the method used is the R&D development method with the tessmer development model which consists of 2 stages, namely: the preliminary stage and the prototyping stage using a formative evaluation flow. Therefore, it can be concluded: (1) The design of puzzle learning media for the initial reading material for grade 1 students at SDN 77 Prabumulih Sumsel can be used to test its validity seen from the assessment at the self-evaluation stage, (2) Produce puzzle learning media on the beginning reading material that valid in score of 92, material expert validation obtained an average score of 98, and linguist validation obtained an average score of 95, (3) Produces puzzle learning media is effective with an average pre-test score of 54 while the average post-test score of 89

Evaluación formativa en EVEA Moodle para mejorar la eficacia y la eficiencia de los estudiantes

This work reflects on the formative assessment in virtual teaching and learning environments (EVEA) Moodle, to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of students, allowing to assess through the student t test, if there is a significant difference between the measures of two independent samples. In order to verify if the result of the activities is more efficient through feedback in the formative evaluation processes, as well as to verify if the student's academic performance is increased through more efficient feedback. The research was quantitative and for the statistical analysis the student t test, using the questionnaire tool, having as a study the group of the Engineering in Information and Communication Technologies career of the eighth semester, in the field of Electronic Business I, from the Higher Technological Institute of Mulegé in Mexico. As a representative sample, 9 students participated and 6 modules were designed where different activities that the same participant would develop were placed. The results indicate that there is a significant difference before without a rubric and afterwards with a rubric in the training processes in the EVEA Moodle platform, where the student's academic performance is increased and improved over time, since the result of the application of Student's t test validates the hypothesis.

Contextual influences on implementation of online behavioral obesity treatment in primary care: formative evaluation guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research

Online behavioral obesity treatment is a promising first-line approach to weight management in primary care. However, little is known about contextual influences on implementation. Understand qualitative contextual factors that affect the implementation process, as experienced by key primary care stakeholders implementing the program. Online behavioral obesity treatment was implemented across a 60-clinic primary care practice network. Patients were enrolled by nurse care managers (NCMs; N = 14), each serving 2–5 practices. NCMs were randomized to one of two implementation conditions—“Basic” (standard implementation) or “Enhanced” (i.e., with added patient tracking features and more implementation strategies employed). NCMs completed qualitative interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via directed content analysis. Emergent categories were summarized by implementation condition and assigned a valence according to positive/negative influence. Individuals in the Enhanced condition viewed two aspects of the intervention as more positively influencing than Basic NCMs: Design Quality & Packaging (i.e., online program aesthetics), and Cost (i.e., no-cost program, clinician time savings). In both conditions, strongly facilitating factors included: Compatibility between intervention and clinical context; Intervention Source (from a trusted local university); and Evidence Strength & Quality supporting effectiveness. Findings highlight the importance of considering stakeholders’ perspectives on the most valued types of evidence when introducing a new intervention, ensuring the program aligns with organizational priorities, and considering how training resources and feedback on patient progress can improve implementation success for online behavioral obesity treatment in primary care.

Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Measurement Ability Instruments in Learning High School Biology

This study aims to produce instruments that can measure the level of students' higher order thinking skills that are valid and practical for students of class XI SMA. The developed instrument contains 40 multiple choice questions, and 10 essay questions consisting Taxonomy Levels C4, C5, and C6 with indicators of high-level thinking critical thinking, decision making, problem solving and creative thinking. This research used the Research and Development (R&D) type of Tessmer's modified formative evaluation with the stages of self-evaluation, prototyping (expert review, one-to-one, and small group). The result of tis research indicates that the instrument for measuring higher order thinking skills in class XI Biology SMA students developed is categorized as very valid and very practical with the validity value of expert rivew very valid (89.9%), one-to-one is very valid (87, 5%)). And the practical value of teachers is very practical (91.33%), and students are very practical (87.15%).