Mechanisms of Whole-Body Vibration Effects on Human Performance

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-472
Author(s):  
John C. Guignard ◽  
Alvah C. Bittner ◽  
Mary M. Harbeson

Oscillatory ship motion and vibration effects on crews in modern naval air and sea systems can be the limiting factor in mission performance. The mechanisms of these effects, however, have not yet been clearly delineated; nor have a practical taxonomy and standard methodology for distinguishing and evaluating the deleterious action of whole-body vibratory motion on human performance been established. Some effects of vibration on performance appear to be directly attributable to immediate mechanical disruption of input and /or output (i.e., interference at the points of contact—displays or controls—between operator and task). Far more meager is clear evidence for time-dependent disruptive or degrading effects of vibration on central cognitive processes: these of course may also be affected indirectly by changes in the physiological state (including motion sickness and fatigue) induced by the motion or vibration. The distinction between direct and indirect mechanisms of performance decrement in the motion environment has important implications for both protective measures and the focus of future research. This report considers published work on the performance effects of vibration in relation to the etiology of performance change and those implications. A critical review of the methodology of performance studies in motion and vibration environments is under way at the Naval Biodynamics Laboratory; and a series of experiments (some previously published) on whole-body vibration effects on performance is also in progress. While the duality of the mechanisms of action of oscillatory motion on performance remains an open question, the evidence so far adduced for other than direct mechanical effects is sparse, at least in the frequency range of major body resonance phenomena. Further experimentation, including long-duration studies, is needed to resolve this question. Implications both for future research directions and for current national and international standardization efforts in this area are discussed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 105051 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Goswami ◽  
S. Redpath ◽  
R.G. Langlois ◽  
J.R. Green ◽  
K.S. Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G.E. Conway ◽  
J.L. Szalma ◽  
B.M. Saxton ◽  
J.M. Ross ◽  
P.A. Hancock

1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Guignard ◽  
Alvah C. Bittner ◽  
Mary M. Harbeson

1972 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Shoenberger

Research concerning several types of human response to whole-body vibration is reviewed and evaluated. Major emphasis is on two categories of behavioral research, subjective judgments of vibration intensity and the effects of vibration on human performance. Discussion of the biodynamic response of the human body to vibration provides background information to aid the reader in understanding and interpreting vibration parameters and results of behavioral studies. Also included are considerations of the mechanisms through which vibration affects behavioral response, and some problems and shortcomings in human vibration research.


Ergonomics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Conway ◽  
J. L. Szalma ◽  
P. A. Hancock

Ergonomics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.S. Paddan ◽  
S.R. Holmes ◽  
N.J. Mansfield ◽  
H. Hutchinson ◽  
C.I. Arrowsmith ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 09005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihaela Picu ◽  
Laurentiu Picu

This paper analyses the influence of whole-body vibrations on human performance; for this it was investigated how a group of men (20-29 years of age) and a group of woman (21–31 years of age) answered to specific requirements after being subjected to vertical vibrations under controlled laboratory conditions for 10-25 min. The vibrations were generated by a vibrant system with known amplitudes and frequencies. Accelerations were measured with NetdB - complex system for measuring and analysing human vibration and they were found in the range 0.4 - 3.1m/s2. The subjects’ performances were determined for each vibration level using specific tests. It can be concluded that exposure to vibrations higher than those recommended by ISO 2631 significantly disrupts how subjects responded to tests requirements.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Conway ◽  
J. L. Szalma ◽  
B. M. Saxton ◽  
J. M. Ross ◽  
P. A. Hancock

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document