Task Re-Categorization for Reducing the Attentional Demands in the Cockpit

Author(s):  
Daniel P. McDonald ◽  
Richard D. Gilson
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Bourke

Despite its intuitive appeal, the commonly held assumption that there is some general limitation on dual-task performance has been shown to be seriously flawed (Allport 1980; Navon 1984). Central to this has been the inability to measure the attentional demands of tasks, without which there is no way to determine whether their joint demands exceed the hypothetical general limit. In the absence of such a measure, dual-task interference can always be explained by the alternative possibility that specific interference has occurred. A method is described in which the attentional demands of tasks can be measured and cross validated by the use of two scales. Two experiments are described in which a general attentional limit is found; the measurement of attentional demand is consistent across scales and can be made at a level of precision approximating that of an interval scale.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Rees ◽  
Allistair McRobert ◽  
Joe Causer ◽  
Mark Williams ◽  
Bryn Baxendale

Aphasiology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 559-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie A. Tompkins ◽  
Margaret Lehman Blake ◽  
Annette Baumgaertner ◽  
Wiltrud Fassbinder

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Bonato ◽  
Marco Zorzi ◽  
Carlo Umiltà

AbstractThe cognitive impairments shown by brain-damaged patients emphasize the role of task difficulty as a major determinant for performance. We discuss the proposal of Kurzban et al. in light of our findings on right-hemisphere–damaged patients, who show increasing awareness deficits for the contralesional hemispace when engaged with resource-consuming dual tasks. This phenomenon is readily explained by the assumption of unspecific depletable resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document