Sonographic Follow-Up of Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing in Situ Open Neurolysis or Endoscopic Release: The SPECTRE Study

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471985781
Author(s):  
Stefano Lucchina ◽  
Cesare Fusetti ◽  
Marco Guidi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Sonographic Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Endoscopic Release ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background:The measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) is a diagnostic tool to detect entrapments syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome in elbows undergoing endoscopic and “in situ” open cubital tunnel release for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) using ultrasound-related changes in the largest CSA of the ulnar nerve. The purpose is to determine the association between clinical outcome and CSA. Methods: From May 2011 to April 2016, 60 patients with CuTS were prospectively followed and not randomly divided in two groups: 30 patients undergoing an endoscopic release (ER) and 30 patients with “in situ” open neurolysis (OR). A sonographic examination was performed by the senior authors at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgical decompression. Results: CSA values were statistically significantly lower in the ER. Hand grip strength difference with Jamar test was not statistically significant a 12 months (39 kg vs 27 kg). Static-2 point discrimination test difference was only statistically significant lower in the endoscopic group at 3, 6 and 12 months but not clinically relevant (5 mm vs 6 mm). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons—Elbow questionnaire (ASES-e) function score, ASES-e Pain score, and ASES-e Satisfaction score were not statistically significant different between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months post operatively. Conclusions: The study confirms that in spite of lower values of CSA in the ER, there is not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques in terms of subjective outcomes. Ultrasound (US) measurements seem to have a limited value in clinical results of patients treated for entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve. Type of study/LOE: Prognostic Level III

scholarly journals Management of cubital tunnel syndrome by anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shawky Ammar ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed El Tabl ◽  
Dalia Salah Saif
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Electrophysiological Study ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Entrapment ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Dash Questionnaire

Abstract Background Various surgical options are used for the treatment of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. In this study, anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve was used for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Objectives To evaluate the surgical results of anterior trans-muscular transposition technique for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with particular emphasis on clinical outcome. Methods Forty patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were operated using anterior trans-muscular transposition technique. Patients were classified into post-operative clinical outcome grades according to the Wilson & Krout criteria, and they were followed up by visual analog scale (VAS), the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, electrophysiological study, and post-operative clinical evaluation. Results Forty patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve show a significant clinical improvement at 24 months post-surgery regarding visual analog scale (VAS), the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, electrophysiological study, and the Wilson & Krout grading as 87.5% of the patients recorded excellent and good outcome. Conclusion Anterior transmuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve is a safe and effective treatment for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.

scholarly journals Predicting Revision Following In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Patients With Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Gaspar ◽  
Patrick M. Kane ◽  
Dechporn Putthiwara ◽  
Sidney M. Jacoby ◽  
A. Lee Osterman
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Anconeus Epitrochlearis Muscle Associated With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Case Series

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-482
Author(s):  
Nicholas Kim ◽  
Ryan Stehr ◽  
Hani S. Matloub ◽  
James R. Sanger
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Conduction Studies ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Compressive Neuropathy ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an unusual but occasional contributor. We review our experience with this anomalous muscle in elbows with cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 13 patients noted to have an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle associated with cubital tunnel syndrome. Results: Ten patients had unilateral ulnar neuropathy supported by nerve conduction studies. Three had bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms with 1 of those having normal nerve conduction studies for both elbows. Eight elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. The other 8 elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. All but 1 patient had either clinical resolution or improvement of symptoms at follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year after surgery. The 1 patient who had persistent symptoms had received myotomy and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. Conclusions: An anomalous anconeus epitrochlearis occasionally results in compression of the ulnar nerve but is usually an incidental finding. Its contribution to compression neuropathy can be tested intraoperatively by passively ranging the elbow while observing the change in vector and tension of its muscle fibers over the ulnar nerve. Regardless of findings, we recommend myotomy of the muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve. Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve may be necessary if there is subluxation.

scholarly journals The pathology of the ulnar nerve in acromegaly

2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Tagliafico ◽  
Eugenia Resmini ◽  
Raffaella Nizzo ◽  
Lorenzo E Derchi ◽  
Francesco Minuto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensory Disturbances ◽  
History Of ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Written Informed Consent

ContextAcromegalic patients may complain of sensory disturbances in their hands. Cubital tunnel syndrome, the ulnar nerve neuropathy at the cubital tunnel (UCT), in acromegalic patients has never been reported.ObjectiveTo describe and assess the prevalence of UCT in acromegalic patients and the effects of 1 year of therapy on UCT.PatientsWe examined prospectively 37 acromegalic patients with no history of polyneuropathy, acute trauma at the elbow, no diabetes or hypothyroidism with clinical examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), and high-resolution ultrasound (US). A control group was made by 50 volunteers. The local ethics committee approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.InterventionClinical history, physical examination, NCS, and US were used to diagnose UCT at the beginning of the study and after 1 year.ResultsIn 8 of 37 patients, a diagnosis of UCT was made at the beginning of the study reflecting a prevalence of 21%. After 1 year, 5 of 8 (62.5%) patients reported clinical and NCS improvements and evident US reduction of nerve cross-sectional area (CSA; 16.7±2.9 mm2 vs 12.2±3.1 mm2; P<0.001). In 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients, the UCT was unchanged. Ulnar nerve CSA was significantly increased in acromegalic patients with UCT (16.7±2.9 mm2 vs 11.1±2.3 mm2; P<0.047).ConclusionUlnar neuropathy could occur in acromegalic patients and can improve in 62% of cases with disease control. Due to the different management and therapeutic approach, it would be important to make differential diagnosis between cubital and carpal tunnel syndrome in acromegaly.

Simple Decompression versus Anterior Submuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Gervasio ◽  
Giuseppe Gambardella ◽  
Claudio Zaccone ◽  
Damiano Branca
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Group B ◽  
Simple Decompression

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The authors report the results of a clinical series of selected patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome. The degree of ulnar nerve compression was evaluated by use of a grading system that includes measurements of motor and sensitive function. The submuscular transposition with flexor-pronator mass Z lengthening was compared with simple decompression through a prospective randomized study. METHODS: From February 1998 to June 2003, 70 patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome were included in this study: 35 patients were submitted to simple decompression (Group A), and 35 patients were treated by anterior deep submuscular transposition (Group B). The preoperative status was determined by use of Dellon's classification. The selected patients had Dellon's Grade 3 (severe syndrome). The mean follow-up period after surgery was 47 months for Group A and 46.94 months for Group B. RESULTS: Postoperative clinical and electrophysiological outcomes were assessed 6 months after surgery in all 70 patients. According to the Bishop scoring system, 19 patients (54.3%) of Group A were clinically graded as excellent, 9 (25.7%) were graded as good, and 7 (20%) were graded as fair; in Group B, 18 patients (51.43%) were graded as excellent, 11 (31.43%) as good, and 6 (17.14%) as fair. Neither severe complications nor recurrences were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the clinical or the electrophysiological outcome. The surgical treatment gains in Group A and B were 80% and 82.86%, respectively (good to excellent results).

scholarly journals Predictors of surgical outcomes after in situ ulnar nerve decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingde Kong ◽  
Jiangbo Bai ◽  
Kunlun Yu ◽  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Jichun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Open vs Retractor-Endoscopic In Situ Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Dützmann ◽  
K. Daniel Martin ◽  
Stephan Sobottka ◽  
Gerhard Marquardt ◽  
Gabriele Schackert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Endoscopic In Situ Decompression

Abstract BACKGROUND: Both open ulnar nerve decompression and retractor-endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression have been shown to yield good results. However, a comparative evaluation of the techniques is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of open and endoscopic surgery in cubital tunnel syndrome. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients undergoing open (n = 59) or endoscopic (n = 55) decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome were retrospectively compared. The long- and short-term outcomes were compared with respect to the time until return to full activity and the duration of postoperative pain. Additionally, matched pairs between the 2 groups were chosen for analysis (n = 34). RESULTS: Long-term results in the open vs endoscopic groups were as follows: excellent results, 54.2% vs 56.4%; good results, 23.8% vs 32.7%; fair results, 20.3% vs 9.1%; and poor results, 1.7% vs 1.8%, respectively. For the matched pairs, the results had similar significance levels (P = .84). The times until return to full activity in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 2 to 7 days, 18.6% vs 76.4%; 7 to 14 days, 55.9% vs 10.9%; and &gt; 14 days, 25.4% vs 12.7% (P &lt; .001 between nonmatched and matched pairs). The durations of postoperative pain in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 1 to 3 days, 45.8% vs 67.3%; 3 to 10 days, 42.5% vs 25.4%; and &gt; 10 days, 11.7% vs 7.3% (P =.04 for nonmatched and P = .05 for matched pairs). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in long-term outcomes after open and retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. The short-term results are significantly better in endoscopic surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document