Ultrasound Measurements of the Median Nerve at the Distal Wrist Crease Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Studies

Hand ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 155894472110663
Author(s):  
Nicholas F. Aloi ◽  
Landon M. Cluts ◽  
John R. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Compound Muscle Action Potential ◽  
Sensory Nerve ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Severity Rating ◽  
Sensory Nerve Action

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment neuropathy and is commonly evaluated using electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs). Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a potentially easier and more comfortable alternative to EDSs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve via US correlate with the severity rating of CTS based on EDSs. Methods: A retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent US and EDSs of the median nerve for CTS was performed. Sensory nerve action potential, distal motor latency, and compound muscle action potential were measured, and severity was graded on American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine guidelines. Cross-sectional area of the median nerve was measured via US at the wrist crease. Results: There was a significant association between increasing CSA and increasing EDS severity ( P < .0001). The mean CSA for normal, mild, moderate, and severe CTS was 7.48 ± 2.00, 10.36 ± 2.53, 12.01 ± 3.64, and 14.34 ± 4.77 mm2, respectively. The area under the curve demonstrated the ability of median nerve CSA to discriminate between normal and abnormal EDSs with an optimal cutoff CSA of ≥10 mm2, as well as, the ability to discriminate between mild CTS and moderate to severe CTS at a cutoff CSA of greater than or equal to 12 mm2. Conclusions: The results of this study show that US measurements of the median nerve at the distal wrist crease discriminate between normal and abnormal EDSs, and between mild CTS and moderate to severe CTS.

scholarly journals Normal neurophysiologic parameters of the median nerve among adult healthy Sudanese population

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Mohammed Salah Elmagzoub ◽  
Ahmed Hassan Ahmed ◽  
Hussam M A Hameed
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Conduction Velocity ◽  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Compound Muscle Action Potential ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Sensory Nerve ◽  
Peak Latency ◽  
Muscle Action Potential ◽  
Sensory Nerve Action

Background: Nerve conduction studies (NCSs) help in delineating the extent distribution of neural lesion, and the diagnosis of peripheral nerve disorders. Because normative nerve conduction parameters were not yet established in Sudan EMG laboratories, this study aims towards having our own reference values, as we are using the American and British parameters. This will allow avoiding the discrepancies that might be induced by many factors. Methods: NCSs were performed in 200 Median nerves of 100 adult healthy Sudanese subjects using standardized techniques. Results: The median SNAP (sensory nerve action potential) values were as follows: distal latency, 2.6±3 ms with a range of (2.3-2.9); peak latency, 3.5±0.5 ms (3.0-4.0); amplitude, 47.7±18.0μV (29.7-65.7); conduction velocity, 53.0±7.8 m/s (45.2-60.8). The following values were obtained for the Median nerve CMAP (compound muscle action potential) at wrist stimulation: distal latency, 3.5±0.5 ms with a range of (3.0-4.0); peak latency, 9.4± 1.0 ms (8.4-10.4); duration, 5.9±0.9 ms (5.0-6.8); amplitude, 12.3±2.5 mV (9.8-14.8); area, 43.0±10.4 mVms (32.6-53.4); conduction velocity, 63.6±6.2 m/s (57.4-69.8). The F wave was 28.4±1.8 ms (26.6-30.2). Conclusion: The overall mean sensory and motor nerve conduction parameters for the tested nerve compared favorably with the existing literature with some discrepancies that were justified.

scholarly journals Ultrasound Assessment of the Median Nerve Does Not Adequately Discriminate the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes

Diabetology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-231
Author(s):  
Carlos Antonio Guillen-Astete ◽  
Monica Luque-Alarcon ◽  
Nuria Garcia-Montes
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most prevalent peripheral nerve entrapment condition of the upper limb. Among metabolic risk factors, diabetes is considered the most relevant. Although wrist ultrasound assessment of the median nerve has demonstrated a good correlation with the gold standard for the diagnosis of this syndrome, neurophysiological study, its usefulness in patients with diabetes is questionable because the compressive phenomenon is not the predominant one. Method: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and median nerve ultrasound features of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome previously diagnosed or not diagnosed with diabetes. Additionally, a linear multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine to what extent the cross-sectional area of the median nerve was dependent on the condition of diabetes by fixing other variables such as sex, age, or time of evolution. Results: We included 303 records of patients (mean age 44.3 ± 11.7 years old, 57.89% female, mean of time of evolution 13.6 ± 8.3 months) from 2012 to 2020. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was 10.46 ± 1.44 mm2 in non-diabetic patients and 8.92 ± 0.9 mm2 in diabetic patients (p < 0.001). Additionally, diabetic patients had a shorter time of evolution (7.91 ± 8.28 months vs. 14.36 ± 0.526 months, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the resultant model (fixed R-square = 0.659, p = 0.003) included a constant of the following four variables: the evolution time (Beta coeff. = 0.108, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.091 to 0.126, standardized coeff. = 0.611), the condition of diabetes (Beta coeff. = −0.623, p < 0.001 95% CI −0.907 to −0.339, standardized coeff. = −0.152), the severity (Beta coeff. = 0.359, p = 0.001 95% CI 0.147 to 0.571, standardized coeff. = 0.169), and the masculine sex (Beta coeff. = 0.309, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.109 to 0.509, standardized coeff. = 0.103). Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of the median nerve in patients with diabetes is not a useful tool to confirm whether carpal tunnel syndrome should be diagnosed or not diagnosed.

scholarly journals Bifid Median Nerve in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Assessment with US Cross-sectional Area Measurement

Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. 808-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Klauser ◽  
Ethan J. Halpern ◽  
Ralph Faschingbauer ◽  
Florian Guerra ◽  
Carlo Martinoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Value of cross-sectional area of median nerve by MRI in carpal tunnel syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-659
Author(s):  
Jin Sung Park ◽  
Hee-Chan Won ◽  
Jin-Young Oh ◽  
Dong-Hee Kim ◽  
Sun-Chul Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Relationship between sonographically measured median nerve cross-sectional area and presence of peripheral neuropathy in diabetic subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrick Andrew Attah ◽  
Christianah Mopelola Asaleye ◽  
Adeleye Dorcas Omisore ◽  
Babatope Ayodeji Kolawole ◽  
Adeniyi Sunday Aderibigbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document